采用降斜度高位胫骨截骨翻修前交叉韧带重建术,临床效果满意,失败率低

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Lorenz Fritsch, Konstantin Dworschak, Maximilian Hinz, Philipp W. Winkler, Bastian Scheiderer, Sebastian Siebenlist, Romed Vieider, Lukas Willinger, Stefan Hinterwimmer, Julian Mehl
{"title":"采用降斜度高位胫骨截骨翻修前交叉韧带重建术,临床效果满意,失败率低","authors":"Lorenz Fritsch,&nbsp;Konstantin Dworschak,&nbsp;Maximilian Hinz,&nbsp;Philipp W. Winkler,&nbsp;Bastian Scheiderer,&nbsp;Sebastian Siebenlist,&nbsp;Romed Vieider,&nbsp;Lukas Willinger,&nbsp;Stefan Hinterwimmer,&nbsp;Julian Mehl","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.70260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess clinical and radiological outcomes after two-staged slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for recurrent ACL insufficiency with an increased posterior tibial Slope (PTS) &gt; 12°.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients operated in two centres between 01/2015 and 01/2022 were included after a minimum follow-up of 24 months after revision ACLR. The postoperative pain and the following scores were obtained: IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, TAS. The Slope was measured using the Dejour technique postoperatively using lateral X-rays being compared to a preoperative X-ray. Also, a clinical examination including range of motion, anterior + posterior translation and pivot-shift were performed. The Rolimeter was used for anterior tibial translation (ATT).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-four patients (18 m, 6 f; age: 27 ± 8 y) were examined after a mean follow-up of 34 ± 10 months. PTS was reduced from 15.2° ± 2.4° to 5.7° ± 3.8°. Scores at final follow-up: IKDC 75.5 ± 1.5, Lysholm 79.9 ± 12.7, KOOS 77.5 ± 11.5, TAS was 5 (interquartile range 4–7). Postoperative Pain was significantly reduced (VAS: 4.0 ± 2.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.3; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Compared to the contralateral side, ATT was higher in the operated knee (2.5 ± 2.9 mm; <i>p</i> = &lt;0.01). Four patients underwent revision surgery (2x non-traumatic instability; 2x traumatic ACL rupture). Additionally, 75% of patients returned to sports, while 64.3% of patients could return to their prior level.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Combined slope-reducing HTO and ACLR lead to good clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and a low failure rate. Patients were able to return to activity, but often at a lower sports level. Anterior tibial translation remains slightly increased compared to the healthy side.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Therapeutic study Level IV, case series.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"12 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70260","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Slope reducing high tibial osteotomy and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to satisfying clinical results and a low failure rate\",\"authors\":\"Lorenz Fritsch,&nbsp;Konstantin Dworschak,&nbsp;Maximilian Hinz,&nbsp;Philipp W. Winkler,&nbsp;Bastian Scheiderer,&nbsp;Sebastian Siebenlist,&nbsp;Romed Vieider,&nbsp;Lukas Willinger,&nbsp;Stefan Hinterwimmer,&nbsp;Julian Mehl\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.70260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to assess clinical and radiological outcomes after two-staged slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for recurrent ACL insufficiency with an increased posterior tibial Slope (PTS) &gt; 12°.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients operated in two centres between 01/2015 and 01/2022 were included after a minimum follow-up of 24 months after revision ACLR. The postoperative pain and the following scores were obtained: IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, TAS. The Slope was measured using the Dejour technique postoperatively using lateral X-rays being compared to a preoperative X-ray. Also, a clinical examination including range of motion, anterior + posterior translation and pivot-shift were performed. The Rolimeter was used for anterior tibial translation (ATT).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-four patients (18 m, 6 f; age: 27 ± 8 y) were examined after a mean follow-up of 34 ± 10 months. PTS was reduced from 15.2° ± 2.4° to 5.7° ± 3.8°. Scores at final follow-up: IKDC 75.5 ± 1.5, Lysholm 79.9 ± 12.7, KOOS 77.5 ± 11.5, TAS was 5 (interquartile range 4–7). Postoperative Pain was significantly reduced (VAS: 4.0 ± 2.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.3; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Compared to the contralateral side, ATT was higher in the operated knee (2.5 ± 2.9 mm; <i>p</i> = &lt;0.01). Four patients underwent revision surgery (2x non-traumatic instability; 2x traumatic ACL rupture). Additionally, 75% of patients returned to sports, while 64.3% of patients could return to their prior level.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Combined slope-reducing HTO and ACLR lead to good clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and a low failure rate. Patients were able to return to activity, but often at a lower sports level. Anterior tibial translation remains slightly increased compared to the healthy side.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Therapeutic study Level IV, case series.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jeo2.70260\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70260\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.70260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估两阶段降低胫骨高位截骨(HTO)和翻修前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)治疗复发性前交叉韧带功能不全并胫骨后倾角(PTS)增加[gt; 12°]的临床和影像学结果。方法选取2015年1月至2022年1月在两个中心手术的患者,在ACLR翻修后至少随访24个月。术后疼痛及以下评分:IKDC、kos、Lysholm、TAS。术后使用Dejour技术测量斜度,使用侧位x线片与术前x线片进行比较。此外,临床检查包括活动范围,前后平移和枢轴移位。Rolimeter用于胫骨前平移(ATT)。结果24例(18 m, 6 f;年龄:27±8岁,平均随访34±10个月。分降低15.2°±2.4°到5.7°±3.8°。最终随访评分:IKDC 75.5±1.5,Lysholm 79.9±12.7,kos 77.5±11.5,TAS 5(四分位数范围4-7)。术后疼痛明显减轻(VAS: 4.0±2.8 vs. 1.4±1.3;p < 0.001)。与对侧相比,手术膝关节ATT增高(2.5±2.9 mm);p = <0.01)。4例患者行翻修手术(2例非外伤性不稳定;2例外伤性ACL破裂)。此外,75%的患者恢复了运动,而64.3%的患者可以恢复到以前的水平。结论减坡HTO联合ACLR临床效果好,患者满意度高,失败率低。患者能够恢复活动,但通常是较低的运动水平。与健康侧相比,胫骨前平移仍略有增加。证据水平治疗性研究IV级,病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Slope reducing high tibial osteotomy and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction leads to satisfying clinical results and a low failure rate

Purpose

This study aimed to assess clinical and radiological outcomes after two-staged slope-reducing high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) for recurrent ACL insufficiency with an increased posterior tibial Slope (PTS) > 12°.

Methods

Patients operated in two centres between 01/2015 and 01/2022 were included after a minimum follow-up of 24 months after revision ACLR. The postoperative pain and the following scores were obtained: IKDC, KOOS, Lysholm, TAS. The Slope was measured using the Dejour technique postoperatively using lateral X-rays being compared to a preoperative X-ray. Also, a clinical examination including range of motion, anterior + posterior translation and pivot-shift were performed. The Rolimeter was used for anterior tibial translation (ATT).

Results

Twenty-four patients (18 m, 6 f; age: 27 ± 8 y) were examined after a mean follow-up of 34 ± 10 months. PTS was reduced from 15.2° ± 2.4° to 5.7° ± 3.8°. Scores at final follow-up: IKDC 75.5 ± 1.5, Lysholm 79.9 ± 12.7, KOOS 77.5 ± 11.5, TAS was 5 (interquartile range 4–7). Postoperative Pain was significantly reduced (VAS: 4.0 ± 2.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.3; p < 0.001). Compared to the contralateral side, ATT was higher in the operated knee (2.5 ± 2.9 mm; p = <0.01). Four patients underwent revision surgery (2x non-traumatic instability; 2x traumatic ACL rupture). Additionally, 75% of patients returned to sports, while 64.3% of patients could return to their prior level.

Conclusion

Combined slope-reducing HTO and ACLR lead to good clinical outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and a low failure rate. Patients were able to return to activity, but often at a lower sports level. Anterior tibial translation remains slightly increased compared to the healthy side.

Level of Evidence

Therapeutic study Level IV, case series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信