Roy E. Elicer, Gabriela I. E. Brancatelli, Sergio M. Zalba
{"title":"持续控制与根除入侵松树的决策分析:以阿根廷潘帕斯南部为例","authors":"Roy E. Elicer, Gabriela I. E. Brancatelli, Sergio M. Zalba","doi":"10.1111/aec.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Biological invasions are one of the main drivers of change in terrestrial ecosystems and also a major expenditure in the budget of conservation units. Management of invasive species involves sets of options, including the alternatives of sustained control aimed at containing the spread of the invader or reducing its density or occupation area vs. the complete eradication of the species from a given site. Grasslands are particularly affected by the expansion of alien trees and shrubs that provoke not just a change in species composition but also a shift in the structure and functioning of the whole ecosystem. In this paper we compare the alternatives of sustained control (containment) vs. eradication and vs. no intervention for a stand of invasive alien pines growing in a grassland nature reserve in the southern Argentinean Pampas. We built a decision analysis schema considering both the effects of the pines on native plant communities and the costs of mechanical control. We compared total vegetation cover, plant species richness, and composition in plots located in areas with different densities of pine trees and in controls free of the invasion. The costs of controlling pines were calculated from actual management interventions in sites with different tree densities. Areas with high density of pines were associated to an impoverishment in vegetation richness and diversity with respect to those at medium and low tree density. Pines were associated with changes in the floristic composition of the piedmont grasslands, including an increase in the abundance of exotic grasses. Cost analysis revealed that sustained control equates to the investment of eradication in thirty years. If we add to the analysis the capacity of <i>P. halepensis</i> to carry out long-distance dispersal events that can result in new invasion nuclei, eradication appears as the most efficient management alternative both in environmental and budgetary terms.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8663,"journal":{"name":"Austral Ecology","volume":"50 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision Analysis for Sustained Control vs. Eradication of Invasive Pines: A Case Study in the Southern Pampas of Argentina\",\"authors\":\"Roy E. Elicer, Gabriela I. E. Brancatelli, Sergio M. Zalba\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aec.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Biological invasions are one of the main drivers of change in terrestrial ecosystems and also a major expenditure in the budget of conservation units. Management of invasive species involves sets of options, including the alternatives of sustained control aimed at containing the spread of the invader or reducing its density or occupation area vs. the complete eradication of the species from a given site. Grasslands are particularly affected by the expansion of alien trees and shrubs that provoke not just a change in species composition but also a shift in the structure and functioning of the whole ecosystem. In this paper we compare the alternatives of sustained control (containment) vs. eradication and vs. no intervention for a stand of invasive alien pines growing in a grassland nature reserve in the southern Argentinean Pampas. We built a decision analysis schema considering both the effects of the pines on native plant communities and the costs of mechanical control. We compared total vegetation cover, plant species richness, and composition in plots located in areas with different densities of pine trees and in controls free of the invasion. The costs of controlling pines were calculated from actual management interventions in sites with different tree densities. Areas with high density of pines were associated to an impoverishment in vegetation richness and diversity with respect to those at medium and low tree density. Pines were associated with changes in the floristic composition of the piedmont grasslands, including an increase in the abundance of exotic grasses. Cost analysis revealed that sustained control equates to the investment of eradication in thirty years. If we add to the analysis the capacity of <i>P. halepensis</i> to carry out long-distance dispersal events that can result in new invasion nuclei, eradication appears as the most efficient management alternative both in environmental and budgetary terms.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"volume\":\"50 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aec.70038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decision Analysis for Sustained Control vs. Eradication of Invasive Pines: A Case Study in the Southern Pampas of Argentina
Biological invasions are one of the main drivers of change in terrestrial ecosystems and also a major expenditure in the budget of conservation units. Management of invasive species involves sets of options, including the alternatives of sustained control aimed at containing the spread of the invader or reducing its density or occupation area vs. the complete eradication of the species from a given site. Grasslands are particularly affected by the expansion of alien trees and shrubs that provoke not just a change in species composition but also a shift in the structure and functioning of the whole ecosystem. In this paper we compare the alternatives of sustained control (containment) vs. eradication and vs. no intervention for a stand of invasive alien pines growing in a grassland nature reserve in the southern Argentinean Pampas. We built a decision analysis schema considering both the effects of the pines on native plant communities and the costs of mechanical control. We compared total vegetation cover, plant species richness, and composition in plots located in areas with different densities of pine trees and in controls free of the invasion. The costs of controlling pines were calculated from actual management interventions in sites with different tree densities. Areas with high density of pines were associated to an impoverishment in vegetation richness and diversity with respect to those at medium and low tree density. Pines were associated with changes in the floristic composition of the piedmont grasslands, including an increase in the abundance of exotic grasses. Cost analysis revealed that sustained control equates to the investment of eradication in thirty years. If we add to the analysis the capacity of P. halepensis to carry out long-distance dispersal events that can result in new invasion nuclei, eradication appears as the most efficient management alternative both in environmental and budgetary terms.
期刊介绍:
Austral Ecology is the premier journal for basic and applied ecology in the Southern Hemisphere. As the official Journal of The Ecological Society of Australia (ESA), Austral Ecology addresses the commonality between ecosystems in Australia and many parts of southern Africa, South America, New Zealand and Oceania. For example many species in the unique biotas of these regions share common Gondwana ancestors. ESA''s aim is to publish innovative research to encourage the sharing of information and experiences that enrich the understanding of the ecology of the Southern Hemisphere.
Austral Ecology involves an editorial board with representatives from Australia, South Africa, New Zealand, Brazil and Argentina. These representatives provide expert opinions, access to qualified reviewers and act as a focus for attracting a wide range of contributions from countries across the region.
Austral Ecology publishes original papers describing experimental, observational or theoretical studies on terrestrial, marine or freshwater systems, which are considered without taxonomic bias. Special thematic issues are published regularly, including symposia on the ecology of estuaries and soft sediment habitats, freshwater systems and coral reef fish.