Roberto G Aru, Florent Porez, Thomas LE Houérou, Mickael Palmier, Antoine Gaudin, Dominique Fabre, Stéphan Haulon
{"title":"慢性胸腹主动脉瘤夹层后的血管内分支修复:术前计划、术中执行和陷阱的机构经验。","authors":"Roberto G Aru, Florent Porez, Thomas LE Houérou, Mickael Palmier, Antoine Gaudin, Dominique Fabre, Stéphan Haulon","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13325-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) in post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD TAAAs), as well as define preoperative planning and intraoperative execution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent BEVAR in PD TAAAs from 2019 to 2024 were identified using a prospectively maintained electronic database at a single, tertiary-care hospital. Patient demographics, comorbidities, indication for the procedure, anatomic and procedural details, and outcomes were retrospectively recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients (74% male, median age 62 years) underwent BEVAR for PD TAAA. There was a high incidence of hypertension (79%) and stage III-V chronic kidney disease (41%). Prior aortic surgery was prevalent in the majority (62%) of patients, with an open (53%) and/or endovascular (35%) approach. BEVAR was commonly performed for asymptomatic PD-TAAA without rupture (71%). Target vessels (TV) arising from the false lumen (FL) and dissected TVs occurred in 32% and 11%, respectively. The majority underwent staged repair by an open (15%) and/or endovascular (47%) approach, most commonly zone 2 (24%) or 3 (15%) thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The off-the-shelf t-Branch (Cook Medical) was used in 24 (70%) patients. The proximal and distal landing zones were in prior/staged TEVAR (71%) and in native infrarenal aorta (65%), respectively. The bridging stent-graft was most commonly balloon-expandable (70%), including hybrid stenting with self-expandable stent-grafts. Adjunctive FL management and prophylactic embolization of type II endoleaks were performed in 56% and 79%, respectively. Technical success was 94%. Postoperative complications were most commonly self-limited acute kidney injury (9%); there was no episodes of spinal cord ischemia. There was a 30-day mortality of 6%. Thirty-day reinterventions were 3% (N.=4, 130 target vessels) for TV-related instability and 6% (N.=2, 34 patients) for FL perfusion. Based on a median follow-up of 18 months, primary and primary-assisted patency of the TV were 94% and 99%, respectively. Midterm reinterventions were 6% for TV-related instability and 35% for FL perfusion. There were no surgical conversions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BEVAR can be performed with high technical success in PD TAAAs. However, secondary interventions for TV instability and continued FL perfusion are frequent; thus, close follow-up is mandatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":101333,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":"178-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Branched endovascular aortic repair of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: an institutional experience on preoperative planning, intraoperative execution, and pitfalls.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto G Aru, Florent Porez, Thomas LE Houérou, Mickael Palmier, Antoine Gaudin, Dominique Fabre, Stéphan Haulon\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13325-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) in post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD TAAAs), as well as define preoperative planning and intraoperative execution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent BEVAR in PD TAAAs from 2019 to 2024 were identified using a prospectively maintained electronic database at a single, tertiary-care hospital. Patient demographics, comorbidities, indication for the procedure, anatomic and procedural details, and outcomes were retrospectively recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-four patients (74% male, median age 62 years) underwent BEVAR for PD TAAA. There was a high incidence of hypertension (79%) and stage III-V chronic kidney disease (41%). Prior aortic surgery was prevalent in the majority (62%) of patients, with an open (53%) and/or endovascular (35%) approach. BEVAR was commonly performed for asymptomatic PD-TAAA without rupture (71%). Target vessels (TV) arising from the false lumen (FL) and dissected TVs occurred in 32% and 11%, respectively. The majority underwent staged repair by an open (15%) and/or endovascular (47%) approach, most commonly zone 2 (24%) or 3 (15%) thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The off-the-shelf t-Branch (Cook Medical) was used in 24 (70%) patients. The proximal and distal landing zones were in prior/staged TEVAR (71%) and in native infrarenal aorta (65%), respectively. The bridging stent-graft was most commonly balloon-expandable (70%), including hybrid stenting with self-expandable stent-grafts. Adjunctive FL management and prophylactic embolization of type II endoleaks were performed in 56% and 79%, respectively. Technical success was 94%. Postoperative complications were most commonly self-limited acute kidney injury (9%); there was no episodes of spinal cord ischemia. There was a 30-day mortality of 6%. Thirty-day reinterventions were 3% (N.=4, 130 target vessels) for TV-related instability and 6% (N.=2, 34 patients) for FL perfusion. Based on a median follow-up of 18 months, primary and primary-assisted patency of the TV were 94% and 99%, respectively. Midterm reinterventions were 6% for TV-related instability and 35% for FL perfusion. There were no surgical conversions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BEVAR can be performed with high technical success in PD TAAAs. However, secondary interventions for TV instability and continued FL perfusion are frequent; thus, close follow-up is mandatory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"178-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13325-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.25.13325-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Branched endovascular aortic repair of chronic post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms: an institutional experience on preoperative planning, intraoperative execution, and pitfalls.
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) in post-dissection thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (PD TAAAs), as well as define preoperative planning and intraoperative execution.
Methods: Patients who underwent BEVAR in PD TAAAs from 2019 to 2024 were identified using a prospectively maintained electronic database at a single, tertiary-care hospital. Patient demographics, comorbidities, indication for the procedure, anatomic and procedural details, and outcomes were retrospectively recorded.
Results: Thirty-four patients (74% male, median age 62 years) underwent BEVAR for PD TAAA. There was a high incidence of hypertension (79%) and stage III-V chronic kidney disease (41%). Prior aortic surgery was prevalent in the majority (62%) of patients, with an open (53%) and/or endovascular (35%) approach. BEVAR was commonly performed for asymptomatic PD-TAAA without rupture (71%). Target vessels (TV) arising from the false lumen (FL) and dissected TVs occurred in 32% and 11%, respectively. The majority underwent staged repair by an open (15%) and/or endovascular (47%) approach, most commonly zone 2 (24%) or 3 (15%) thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The off-the-shelf t-Branch (Cook Medical) was used in 24 (70%) patients. The proximal and distal landing zones were in prior/staged TEVAR (71%) and in native infrarenal aorta (65%), respectively. The bridging stent-graft was most commonly balloon-expandable (70%), including hybrid stenting with self-expandable stent-grafts. Adjunctive FL management and prophylactic embolization of type II endoleaks were performed in 56% and 79%, respectively. Technical success was 94%. Postoperative complications were most commonly self-limited acute kidney injury (9%); there was no episodes of spinal cord ischemia. There was a 30-day mortality of 6%. Thirty-day reinterventions were 3% (N.=4, 130 target vessels) for TV-related instability and 6% (N.=2, 34 patients) for FL perfusion. Based on a median follow-up of 18 months, primary and primary-assisted patency of the TV were 94% and 99%, respectively. Midterm reinterventions were 6% for TV-related instability and 35% for FL perfusion. There were no surgical conversions.
Conclusions: BEVAR can be performed with high technical success in PD TAAAs. However, secondary interventions for TV instability and continued FL perfusion are frequent; thus, close follow-up is mandatory.