以用户为中心的设计和两种支持Crisantaspase重组化疗排序的电子健康记录工具的比较。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00306
Renee Potashner, Tracey Taylor, Ally Sarna, Marilyn Cooper, Siron Thayaparan, Lillian Sung, Karim Jessa, Adam P Yan
{"title":"以用户为中心的设计和两种支持Crisantaspase重组化疗排序的电子健康记录工具的比较。","authors":"Renee Potashner, Tracey Taylor, Ally Sarna, Marilyn Cooper, Siron Thayaparan, Lillian Sung, Karim Jessa, Adam P Yan","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemotherapy ordering errors can have serious safety implications in pediatric oncology. Computerized provider order entry systems may reduce chemotherapy ordering errors. Crisantaspase recombinant (crisantaspase) is a chemotherapy drug used in pediatric leukemia that poses significant safety risk when ordering because of complex dosing and monitoring. The aim of this study was to compare errors, satisfaction, and efficiency between two approaches to ordering in our electronic health record: namely, the standard treatment plan order group (OG) and a novel supportive care plan (SCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited oncology providers and nurses at an academic pediatric institution. Providers were asked to complete two simulated chemotherapy ordering sessions using the treatment plan OG and the SCP. Order entry errors were assessed in seven domains, and the total number of order entry errors was calculated. Satisfaction was assessed using a five-point Likert scale, and satisfaction was defined as answering \"Agree\" or \"Strongly Agree\" to all five satisfaction questions. Efficiency was compared by measuring the time to complete the task. Errors, satisfaction, and efficiency were compared between the two tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 14 providers and five nurses. The proportion of chemotherapy ordering errors was significantly lower with the SCP (5 of 98, 5.1%) compared with the treatment plan OG (11 of 98, 11.2%; <i>P</i> < .01). The SCP significantly improved provider efficiency, reducing the time taken to complete order entry from 16.3 minutes with the OG to 7.7 minutes with the SCP (mean difference, 8.6 minutes; <i>P</i> < .001). Provider satisfaction was significantly higher with the SCP (12 of 14, 85.7%) compared with the treatment plan OG (2 of 14, 14.2%; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a novel SCP instead of a tradition treatment plan OG improved provider efficiency and satisfaction while decreasing order entry errors. Thoughtful design and usability testing of chemotherapy order tools is needed to maximize their utility.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"User-Centered Design and Comparison of Two Electronic Health Record Tools to Support the Ordering of Crisantaspase Recombinant Chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Renee Potashner, Tracey Taylor, Ally Sarna, Marilyn Cooper, Siron Thayaparan, Lillian Sung, Karim Jessa, Adam P Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/CCI-24-00306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Chemotherapy ordering errors can have serious safety implications in pediatric oncology. Computerized provider order entry systems may reduce chemotherapy ordering errors. Crisantaspase recombinant (crisantaspase) is a chemotherapy drug used in pediatric leukemia that poses significant safety risk when ordering because of complex dosing and monitoring. The aim of this study was to compare errors, satisfaction, and efficiency between two approaches to ordering in our electronic health record: namely, the standard treatment plan order group (OG) and a novel supportive care plan (SCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited oncology providers and nurses at an academic pediatric institution. Providers were asked to complete two simulated chemotherapy ordering sessions using the treatment plan OG and the SCP. Order entry errors were assessed in seven domains, and the total number of order entry errors was calculated. Satisfaction was assessed using a five-point Likert scale, and satisfaction was defined as answering \\\"Agree\\\" or \\\"Strongly Agree\\\" to all five satisfaction questions. Efficiency was compared by measuring the time to complete the task. Errors, satisfaction, and efficiency were compared between the two tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 14 providers and five nurses. The proportion of chemotherapy ordering errors was significantly lower with the SCP (5 of 98, 5.1%) compared with the treatment plan OG (11 of 98, 11.2%; <i>P</i> < .01). The SCP significantly improved provider efficiency, reducing the time taken to complete order entry from 16.3 minutes with the OG to 7.7 minutes with the SCP (mean difference, 8.6 minutes; <i>P</i> < .001). Provider satisfaction was significantly higher with the SCP (12 of 14, 85.7%) compared with the treatment plan OG (2 of 14, 14.2%; <i>P</i> < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Use of a novel SCP instead of a tradition treatment plan OG improved provider efficiency and satisfaction while decreasing order entry errors. Thoughtful design and usability testing of chemotherapy order tools is needed to maximize their utility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2400306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在小儿肿瘤治疗中,化疗用药顺序错误会产生严重的安全隐患。计算机化的提供者订单输入系统可以减少化疗订单错误。Crisantaspase重组(Crisantaspase)是一种用于儿科白血病的化疗药物,由于复杂的剂量和监测,在订购时存在重大的安全风险。本研究的目的是比较电子健康记录中两种订购方法的错误、满意度和效率:即标准治疗计划订购组(OG)和新型支持性护理计划订购组(SCP)。方法:我们招募了一家学术儿科机构的肿瘤科医生和护士。提供者被要求使用OG和SCP治疗方案完成两次模拟化疗订购会议。评估了7个领域的订单输入错误,并计算了订单输入错误的总数。满意度采用李克特五点量表进行评估,满意度被定义为对所有五个满意度问题回答“同意”或“非常同意”。效率是通过测量完成任务的时间来比较的。比较两种工具的误差、满意度和效率。结果:我们招募了14名提供者和5名护士。与OG组相比,SCP组的化疗顺序错误比例(5 / 98,5.1%)显著低于OG组(11 / 98,11.2%;P < 0.01)。SCP显著提高了供应商效率,将完成订单输入所需的时间从OG的16.3分钟减少到SCP的7.7分钟(平均差异8.6分钟;P < 0.001)。提供者对SCP的满意度(12 / 14,85.7%)明显高于治疗方案OG (2 / 14, 14.2%;P < 0.001)。结论:使用新颖的SCP代替传统的治疗方案OG提高了医疗服务提供者的效率和满意度,同时减少了订单输入错误。化疗订单工具需要经过深思熟虑的设计和可用性测试,以最大限度地发挥其效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
User-Centered Design and Comparison of Two Electronic Health Record Tools to Support the Ordering of Crisantaspase Recombinant Chemotherapy.

Purpose: Chemotherapy ordering errors can have serious safety implications in pediatric oncology. Computerized provider order entry systems may reduce chemotherapy ordering errors. Crisantaspase recombinant (crisantaspase) is a chemotherapy drug used in pediatric leukemia that poses significant safety risk when ordering because of complex dosing and monitoring. The aim of this study was to compare errors, satisfaction, and efficiency between two approaches to ordering in our electronic health record: namely, the standard treatment plan order group (OG) and a novel supportive care plan (SCP).

Methods: We recruited oncology providers and nurses at an academic pediatric institution. Providers were asked to complete two simulated chemotherapy ordering sessions using the treatment plan OG and the SCP. Order entry errors were assessed in seven domains, and the total number of order entry errors was calculated. Satisfaction was assessed using a five-point Likert scale, and satisfaction was defined as answering "Agree" or "Strongly Agree" to all five satisfaction questions. Efficiency was compared by measuring the time to complete the task. Errors, satisfaction, and efficiency were compared between the two tools.

Results: We enrolled 14 providers and five nurses. The proportion of chemotherapy ordering errors was significantly lower with the SCP (5 of 98, 5.1%) compared with the treatment plan OG (11 of 98, 11.2%; P < .01). The SCP significantly improved provider efficiency, reducing the time taken to complete order entry from 16.3 minutes with the OG to 7.7 minutes with the SCP (mean difference, 8.6 minutes; P < .001). Provider satisfaction was significantly higher with the SCP (12 of 14, 85.7%) compared with the treatment plan OG (2 of 14, 14.2%; P < .001).

Conclusion: Use of a novel SCP instead of a tradition treatment plan OG improved provider efficiency and satisfaction while decreasing order entry errors. Thoughtful design and usability testing of chemotherapy order tools is needed to maximize their utility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信