单侧透明薄鼻漏:多久一次是脑脊液漏?

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
William Mason, Hussein Mackie, Alan Kulawczyk, Jun Jin, John R Craig
{"title":"单侧透明薄鼻漏:多久一次是脑脊液漏?","authors":"William Mason, Hussein Mackie, Alan Kulawczyk, Jun Jin, John R Craig","doi":"10.1177/00034894251338895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine frequencies of conditions causing unilateral clear thin rhinorrhea (UCTR), and assess whether certain clinical features are associated with CSF rhinorrhea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review identifying all patients presenting with UCTR to one rhinologist over a 6-year period. The conditions causing UCTR were recorded, and the following demographic or clinical variables were collected when available: body-mass index (BMI, kg/m2), gender, age, race, and self-reported drainage volume (whether the UCTR dripped out the nose and could be collected, or it felt like a wet nostril with intermittent running down lip that was unlikely to be collectable).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,041 patients, 146 were identified with at least UCTR (4.8%). Mean age was 56.2 ± 17.6 years, and 65.8% were female. Amongst UCTR, nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) was the most common cause (45%), followed by CSF rhinorrhea (30%). On multivariate analysis, the following were significantly positively associated with CSF rhinorrhea: BMI≥30 (OR=4.95), ages 45-54 years (OR=3.67) and 55-64 years (OR=4.15), and self-reported UCTR dripping with collectability (OR=5.96)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAR was the most common cause of UCTR, representing nearly 50% of cases. However, CSF rhinorrhea still represented 30% of cases, reinforcing that UCTR should be worked up for CSF rhinorrhea, ideally with B2-Tf testing. BMI ≥30, ages 45-64 years, and patient-reported higher volume UCTR were positively associated with CSF rhinorrhea. If B2-Tf testing is negative or unobtainable, or clinical suspicion for CSF leak is low, clinicians can consider starting medical therapy for rhinitis or rhinosinusitis before pursuing further invasive CSF confirmatory testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894251338895"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral Clear Thin Rhinorrhea: How Often Is It a Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak?\",\"authors\":\"William Mason, Hussein Mackie, Alan Kulawczyk, Jun Jin, John R Craig\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00034894251338895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine frequencies of conditions causing unilateral clear thin rhinorrhea (UCTR), and assess whether certain clinical features are associated with CSF rhinorrhea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective review identifying all patients presenting with UCTR to one rhinologist over a 6-year period. The conditions causing UCTR were recorded, and the following demographic or clinical variables were collected when available: body-mass index (BMI, kg/m2), gender, age, race, and self-reported drainage volume (whether the UCTR dripped out the nose and could be collected, or it felt like a wet nostril with intermittent running down lip that was unlikely to be collectable).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3,041 patients, 146 were identified with at least UCTR (4.8%). Mean age was 56.2 ± 17.6 years, and 65.8% were female. Amongst UCTR, nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) was the most common cause (45%), followed by CSF rhinorrhea (30%). On multivariate analysis, the following were significantly positively associated with CSF rhinorrhea: BMI≥30 (OR=4.95), ages 45-54 years (OR=3.67) and 55-64 years (OR=4.15), and self-reported UCTR dripping with collectability (OR=5.96)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NAR was the most common cause of UCTR, representing nearly 50% of cases. However, CSF rhinorrhea still represented 30% of cases, reinforcing that UCTR should be worked up for CSF rhinorrhea, ideally with B2-Tf testing. BMI ≥30, ages 45-64 years, and patient-reported higher volume UCTR were positively associated with CSF rhinorrhea. If B2-Tf testing is negative or unobtainable, or clinical suspicion for CSF leak is low, clinicians can consider starting medical therapy for rhinitis or rhinosinusitis before pursuing further invasive CSF confirmatory testing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"34894251338895\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251338895\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251338895","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定单侧透明薄鼻漏(UCTR)的发病频率,并评估某些临床特征是否与脑脊液鼻漏相关。方法:这是一项回顾性研究,确定所有在6年期间向一位鼻科医生提出UCTR的患者。记录导致UCTR的条件,并收集以下可用的人口统计学或临床变量:身体质量指数(BMI, kg/m2),性别,年龄,种族和自我报告的引流量(UCTR是否从鼻子滴出并可以收集,或者感觉像湿润的鼻孔,间歇性地流下嘴唇,不太可能收集)。结果:在3041例患者中,146例被确定为至少UCTR(4.8%)。平均年龄56.2±17.6岁,女性占65.8%。在UCTR中,非过敏性鼻炎(NAR)是最常见的原因(45%),其次是脑脊液鼻漏(30%)。多因素分析显示,BMI≥30 (OR=4.95)、年龄45-54岁(OR=3.67)和55-64岁(OR=4.15)、自述UCTR滴漏可收集(OR=5.96)与脑脊液鼻漏呈显著正相关。结论:NAR是UCTR最常见的原因,占近50%的病例。然而,脑脊液鼻漏仍占30%的病例,这加强了对脑脊液鼻漏进行UCTR的工作,最好是进行B2-Tf检测。BMI≥30,年龄45-64岁,患者报告的较高UCTR容量与脑脊液鼻漏呈正相关。如果B2-Tf检测阴性或无法获得,或临床对脑脊液泄漏的怀疑较低,临床医生可以考虑开始鼻炎或鼻窦炎的药物治疗,然后再进行进一步的有创脑脊液确证检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unilateral Clear Thin Rhinorrhea: How Often Is It a Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak?

Objectives: Determine frequencies of conditions causing unilateral clear thin rhinorrhea (UCTR), and assess whether certain clinical features are associated with CSF rhinorrhea.

Methods: This was a retrospective review identifying all patients presenting with UCTR to one rhinologist over a 6-year period. The conditions causing UCTR were recorded, and the following demographic or clinical variables were collected when available: body-mass index (BMI, kg/m2), gender, age, race, and self-reported drainage volume (whether the UCTR dripped out the nose and could be collected, or it felt like a wet nostril with intermittent running down lip that was unlikely to be collectable).

Results: Of 3,041 patients, 146 were identified with at least UCTR (4.8%). Mean age was 56.2 ± 17.6 years, and 65.8% were female. Amongst UCTR, nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) was the most common cause (45%), followed by CSF rhinorrhea (30%). On multivariate analysis, the following were significantly positively associated with CSF rhinorrhea: BMI≥30 (OR=4.95), ages 45-54 years (OR=3.67) and 55-64 years (OR=4.15), and self-reported UCTR dripping with collectability (OR=5.96)).

Conclusions: NAR was the most common cause of UCTR, representing nearly 50% of cases. However, CSF rhinorrhea still represented 30% of cases, reinforcing that UCTR should be worked up for CSF rhinorrhea, ideally with B2-Tf testing. BMI ≥30, ages 45-64 years, and patient-reported higher volume UCTR were positively associated with CSF rhinorrhea. If B2-Tf testing is negative or unobtainable, or clinical suspicion for CSF leak is low, clinicians can consider starting medical therapy for rhinitis or rhinosinusitis before pursuing further invasive CSF confirmatory testing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信