利用任务伙伴系统改进家庭医学住院医师的工作流程。

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2025-04-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2025.685891
Kathryn Hawks, Brandi Dahl, Alexander Melkonian, Laura Helmly
{"title":"利用任务伙伴系统改进家庭医学住院医师的工作流程。","authors":"Kathryn Hawks, Brandi Dahl, Alexander Melkonian, Laura Helmly","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.685891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inbox management in outpatient primary care consumes a substantial amount of time, and residency training programs face unique challenges related to provider schedules. Long work hours, provider burnout, and worse patient outcomes can all be attributed to task management burden. Team-based care models can provide support through coverage systems and group inboxes. However, more empirical study of these systems may help to inform their implementation in interdisciplinary medical residency outpatient clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study investigated the implementation of a \"task buddy\" system, which paired providers in teams to manage electronic health record (EHR) tasks. Data were collected on average task age and number of late tasks preimplementation, postimplementation, and 6 months postimplementation. Paired samples <i>t</i> tests were used to compare average task age for each task team. Participation was encouraged through a small monetary reward.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 resident physicians and 13 faculty from multiple disciplines participated. Our data demonstrated that the average age of tasks was more than 1 day lower with this system, but total late tasks did not improve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The task buddy system resulted in quicker response time to complete tasks, but the number of late tasks stayed stagnant. Future studies should assess any correlation between improved patient outcomes with more efficient EHR task management. Additional studies across multiple residencies and specialties could better elucidate generalizability and provider perspectives of this pilot program.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081012/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Workflow With a Task Buddy System in a Family Medicine Residency.\",\"authors\":\"Kathryn Hawks, Brandi Dahl, Alexander Melkonian, Laura Helmly\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.685891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Inbox management in outpatient primary care consumes a substantial amount of time, and residency training programs face unique challenges related to provider schedules. Long work hours, provider burnout, and worse patient outcomes can all be attributed to task management burden. Team-based care models can provide support through coverage systems and group inboxes. However, more empirical study of these systems may help to inform their implementation in interdisciplinary medical residency outpatient clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study investigated the implementation of a \\\"task buddy\\\" system, which paired providers in teams to manage electronic health record (EHR) tasks. Data were collected on average task age and number of late tasks preimplementation, postimplementation, and 6 months postimplementation. Paired samples <i>t</i> tests were used to compare average task age for each task team. Participation was encouraged through a small monetary reward.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 23 resident physicians and 13 faculty from multiple disciplines participated. Our data demonstrated that the average age of tasks was more than 1 day lower with this system, but total late tasks did not improve.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The task buddy system resulted in quicker response time to complete tasks, but the number of late tasks stayed stagnant. Future studies should assess any correlation between improved patient outcomes with more efficient EHR task management. Additional studies across multiple residencies and specialties could better elucidate generalizability and provider perspectives of this pilot program.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081012/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.685891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.685891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:门诊初级保健的收件箱管理消耗了大量的时间,住院医师培训计划面临着与提供者时间表相关的独特挑战。长时间的工作、医务人员的倦怠和更糟糕的病人结果都可以归因于任务管理负担。基于团队的护理模式可以通过覆盖系统和群组收件箱提供支持。然而,更多的实证研究这些系统可能有助于告知其在跨学科的住院医师门诊诊所的实施。方法:目前的研究调查了“任务伙伴”系统的实施,该系统将团队中的提供者配对管理电子健康记录(EHR)任务。数据收集了平均任务年龄和执行前、实施后和实施后6个月的延迟任务数量。配对样本t检验用于比较每个任务组的平均任务年龄。通过小额金钱奖励鼓励参与。结果:共有23名住院医师和13名多学科教师参与。我们的数据表明,使用该系统,任务的平均年龄降低了1天以上,但总延迟任务并没有改善。结论:任务伙伴系统使完成任务的响应时间更快,但延迟的任务数量保持不变。未来的研究应评估改善患者预后与更有效的电子病历任务管理之间的相关性。对多个住院医师和专业的进一步研究可以更好地阐明该试点项目的普遍性和提供者的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Workflow With a Task Buddy System in a Family Medicine Residency.

Introduction: Inbox management in outpatient primary care consumes a substantial amount of time, and residency training programs face unique challenges related to provider schedules. Long work hours, provider burnout, and worse patient outcomes can all be attributed to task management burden. Team-based care models can provide support through coverage systems and group inboxes. However, more empirical study of these systems may help to inform their implementation in interdisciplinary medical residency outpatient clinics.

Methods: The current study investigated the implementation of a "task buddy" system, which paired providers in teams to manage electronic health record (EHR) tasks. Data were collected on average task age and number of late tasks preimplementation, postimplementation, and 6 months postimplementation. Paired samples t tests were used to compare average task age for each task team. Participation was encouraged through a small monetary reward.

Results: A total of 23 resident physicians and 13 faculty from multiple disciplines participated. Our data demonstrated that the average age of tasks was more than 1 day lower with this system, but total late tasks did not improve.

Conclusions: The task buddy system resulted in quicker response time to complete tasks, but the number of late tasks stayed stagnant. Future studies should assess any correlation between improved patient outcomes with more efficient EHR task management. Additional studies across multiple residencies and specialties could better elucidate generalizability and provider perspectives of this pilot program.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信