美国家庭医学住院医师的全球健康课程。

PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.) Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22454/PRiMER.2025.419761
Kathy Z Chang, Lauren Bull, Ruben H Hernandez, Sommer Aldulaimi, Nora Kratz, Orrin Myers, Esther M Johnston
{"title":"美国家庭医学住院医师的全球健康课程。","authors":"Kathy Z Chang, Lauren Bull, Ruben H Hernandez, Sommer Aldulaimi, Nora Kratz, Orrin Myers, Esther M Johnston","doi":"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.419761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interest in training opportunities and ethical engagement in global health among medical trainees continues to increase. Preparation activities and formal curriculum for trainees traveling for international rotations vary widely across programs, and alignment with ethical best practice guidelines among US family medicine (FM) residency programs is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed FM residency programs about their global health (GH) curricula, with focus on practice alignment with ethical guiding principles for pretravel training in GH programs. We analyzed the responses by type of residency program and availability of faculty lead with expertise in GH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty programs were included in analysis of GH curriculum specifics. Programs with expert leads were significantly more likely to have a formal GH curriculum and/or pretravel training, to offer formal and informal faculty mentorship on cultural expectations and global health ethics, and to include scope of practice (<i>P=</i>.001) and pretravel safety training with a standard institutional process (<i>P</i>=.011). Program type was not significantly correlated with global health curriculum specifics, except for availability of journal club. Small sample sizes limited our analysis of residency type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Programs with an expert GH faculty lead were more likely to have formal GH curriculum or pretravel training with inclusion of elements recommended by the WEIGHT ethical best practices for GH training. Residency programs should consider designating lead faculty to formalize GH curriculum and mentorship in alignment with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competency requirements and with WEIGHT ethical best practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":74494,"journal":{"name":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","volume":"9 ","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global Health Curriculum in US Family Medicine Residencies.\",\"authors\":\"Kathy Z Chang, Lauren Bull, Ruben H Hernandez, Sommer Aldulaimi, Nora Kratz, Orrin Myers, Esther M Johnston\",\"doi\":\"10.22454/PRiMER.2025.419761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interest in training opportunities and ethical engagement in global health among medical trainees continues to increase. Preparation activities and formal curriculum for trainees traveling for international rotations vary widely across programs, and alignment with ethical best practice guidelines among US family medicine (FM) residency programs is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed FM residency programs about their global health (GH) curricula, with focus on practice alignment with ethical guiding principles for pretravel training in GH programs. We analyzed the responses by type of residency program and availability of faculty lead with expertise in GH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty programs were included in analysis of GH curriculum specifics. Programs with expert leads were significantly more likely to have a formal GH curriculum and/or pretravel training, to offer formal and informal faculty mentorship on cultural expectations and global health ethics, and to include scope of practice (<i>P=</i>.001) and pretravel safety training with a standard institutional process (<i>P</i>=.011). Program type was not significantly correlated with global health curriculum specifics, except for availability of journal club. Small sample sizes limited our analysis of residency type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Programs with an expert GH faculty lead were more likely to have formal GH curriculum or pretravel training with inclusion of elements recommended by the WEIGHT ethical best practices for GH training. Residency programs should consider designating lead faculty to formalize GH curriculum and mentorship in alignment with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competency requirements and with WEIGHT ethical best practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081014/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.419761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22454/PRiMER.2025.419761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:医学受训人员对全球卫生培训机会和道德参与的兴趣继续增加。培训生国际轮转旅行的准备活动和正式课程因项目而异,与美国家庭医学(FM)住院医师项目的道德最佳实践指南的一致性尚不清楚。方法:我们调查了FM住院医师项目的全球健康(GH)课程,重点关注GH项目旅行前培训的道德指导原则的实践一致性。我们根据住院医师项目的类型和在GH方面具有专业知识的教师领导的可用性分析了这些反应。结果:50个项目被纳入GH课程细节分析。由专家领导的项目更有可能有正式的GH课程和/或旅行前培训,提供关于文化期望和全球健康伦理的正式和非正式教师指导,并包括实践范围(P=.001)和旅行前安全培训与标准制度程序(P=.011)。除了期刊俱乐部的可用性外,课程类型与全球健康课程的具体内容无显著相关。样本量小限制了我们对居住类型的分析。结论:由生长激素专家领导的项目更有可能有正式的生长激素课程或旅行前培训,其中包括体重伦理最佳生长激素培训实践推荐的元素。住院医师培训计划应考虑指定领导教师来正式制定GH课程和指导,以符合研究生医学教育能力要求和WEIGHT道德最佳实践认证委员会的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global Health Curriculum in US Family Medicine Residencies.

Introduction: Interest in training opportunities and ethical engagement in global health among medical trainees continues to increase. Preparation activities and formal curriculum for trainees traveling for international rotations vary widely across programs, and alignment with ethical best practice guidelines among US family medicine (FM) residency programs is unknown.

Methods: We surveyed FM residency programs about their global health (GH) curricula, with focus on practice alignment with ethical guiding principles for pretravel training in GH programs. We analyzed the responses by type of residency program and availability of faculty lead with expertise in GH.

Results: Fifty programs were included in analysis of GH curriculum specifics. Programs with expert leads were significantly more likely to have a formal GH curriculum and/or pretravel training, to offer formal and informal faculty mentorship on cultural expectations and global health ethics, and to include scope of practice (P=.001) and pretravel safety training with a standard institutional process (P=.011). Program type was not significantly correlated with global health curriculum specifics, except for availability of journal club. Small sample sizes limited our analysis of residency type.

Conclusion: Programs with an expert GH faculty lead were more likely to have formal GH curriculum or pretravel training with inclusion of elements recommended by the WEIGHT ethical best practices for GH training. Residency programs should consider designating lead faculty to formalize GH curriculum and mentorship in alignment with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education competency requirements and with WEIGHT ethical best practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信