Nova食品分类在2017-2018年家庭预算调查中的应用:监测《巴西人口膳食指南》建议的遵守情况。

IF 2.5 Q1 Multidisciplinary
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude Pub Date : 2025-05-12 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240369.en
Gabriela Lopes da Cruz, Giovanna Calixto Andrade, Fernanda Rauber, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada
{"title":"Nova食品分类在2017-2018年家庭预算调查中的应用:监测《巴西人口膳食指南》建议的遵守情况。","authors":"Gabriela Lopes da Cruz, Giovanna Calixto Andrade, Fernanda Rauber, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada","doi":"10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240369.en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the food categorization method of the 2017-2018 Household Budget Survey as per the Nova classification, bringing transparency and replicability to the process of monitoring adherence to the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The foods reported in the Survey were classified in four stages, namely: identification of culinary preparations and items composed of more than one food; determination of the recipe for culinary preparations and items to be disaggregated; application of the Nova classification; sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After disaggregation, 1,856 items were classified according to the Nova classification, consisting of 1,050 unprocessed or minimally processed foods, 54 processed culinary ingredients, 160 processed foods and 592 ultra-processed foods. Foods whose classification raised questions during the accounted for 4% of the total dietary energy. The contribution of ultra-processed food to total caloric intake varied from 19.7% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 19.3; 20.1) to 17.7% (95%CI 17.4; 18.1) after conducting sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a standardized method to apply the Nova classification to the Household Budget Survey was effective and led to estimates whose uncertainties minimally affected the overall results. The methodology presented can be replicated in future editions of the Household Budget Survey and other food consumption studies, strengthening food and nutritional surveillance as applied to the Dietary Guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":51473,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","volume":"34 ","pages":"e20240369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077547/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the Nova food classification to the 2017-2018 Household Budget Survey: monitoring adherence to the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Lopes da Cruz, Giovanna Calixto Andrade, Fernanda Rauber, Renata Bertazzi Levy, Maria Laura da Costa Louzada\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240369.en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the food categorization method of the 2017-2018 Household Budget Survey as per the Nova classification, bringing transparency and replicability to the process of monitoring adherence to the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The foods reported in the Survey were classified in four stages, namely: identification of culinary preparations and items composed of more than one food; determination of the recipe for culinary preparations and items to be disaggregated; application of the Nova classification; sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After disaggregation, 1,856 items were classified according to the Nova classification, consisting of 1,050 unprocessed or minimally processed foods, 54 processed culinary ingredients, 160 processed foods and 592 ultra-processed foods. Foods whose classification raised questions during the accounted for 4% of the total dietary energy. The contribution of ultra-processed food to total caloric intake varied from 19.7% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 19.3; 20.1) to 17.7% (95%CI 17.4; 18.1) after conducting sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using a standardized method to apply the Nova classification to the Household Budget Survey was effective and led to estimates whose uncertainties minimally affected the overall results. The methodology presented can be replicated in future editions of the Household Budget Survey and other food consumption studies, strengthening food and nutritional surveillance as applied to the Dietary Guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude\",\"volume\":\"34 \",\"pages\":\"e20240369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12077547/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240369.en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Multidisciplinary\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S2237-96222025v34e20240369.en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据Nova分类描述2017-2018年家庭预算调查的食品分类方法,为监测《巴西人口膳食指南》建议的遵守情况提供透明度和可复制性。方法:调查中所报告的食物分四个阶段分类,即:鉴定烹饪准备和由一种以上食物组成的项目;确定烹饪制剂的配方和要分解的物品;新星分类法的应用;敏感性分析。结果:按Nova分类分类后,共有1856个项目被分类,包括1050种未加工或最低加工食品,54种加工烹饪食材,160种加工食品和592种超加工食品。在研究期间,分类有问题的食物占总膳食能量的4%。超加工食品对总热量摄入的贡献从19.7%(95%置信区间[95% ci] 19.3;20.1)至17.7% (95%CI 17.4;18.1)进行敏感性分析后。结论:使用标准化方法将Nova分类应用于家庭预算调查是有效的,并导致其不确定性对整体结果影响最小的估计。所提出的方法可在《家庭预算调查》和其他食品消费研究的未来版本中加以复制,以加强适用于《膳食指南》的食品和营养监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of the Nova food classification to the 2017-2018 Household Budget Survey: monitoring adherence to the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.

Objective: To describe the food categorization method of the 2017-2018 Household Budget Survey as per the Nova classification, bringing transparency and replicability to the process of monitoring adherence to the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population.

Methods: The foods reported in the Survey were classified in four stages, namely: identification of culinary preparations and items composed of more than one food; determination of the recipe for culinary preparations and items to be disaggregated; application of the Nova classification; sensitivity analysis.

Results: After disaggregation, 1,856 items were classified according to the Nova classification, consisting of 1,050 unprocessed or minimally processed foods, 54 processed culinary ingredients, 160 processed foods and 592 ultra-processed foods. Foods whose classification raised questions during the accounted for 4% of the total dietary energy. The contribution of ultra-processed food to total caloric intake varied from 19.7% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 19.3; 20.1) to 17.7% (95%CI 17.4; 18.1) after conducting sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion: Using a standardized method to apply the Nova classification to the Household Budget Survey was effective and led to estimates whose uncertainties minimally affected the overall results. The methodology presented can be replicated in future editions of the Household Budget Survey and other food consumption studies, strengthening food and nutritional surveillance as applied to the Dietary Guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude
Epidemiologia e Servicos de Saude PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信