确定能力框架和培训要求,以支持在澳大利亚公共三级卫生机构中通过远程保健提供物理治疗:一项多方法研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-14 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2025.2498690
Michelle Cottrell, Sarah Featherston, Kelsey Pateman
{"title":"确定能力框架和培训要求,以支持在澳大利亚公共三级卫生机构中通过远程保健提供物理治疗:一项多方法研究。","authors":"Michelle Cottrell, Sarah Featherston, Kelsey Pateman","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2498690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate clinician training and support is a primary challenge to physiotherapists' adopting telehealth. Training must be underpinned by relevant capability frameworks and co-developed to meet the needs and preferences of the existing physiotherapy workforce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish a capability framework for delivery of care via telehealth and understand training requirements to achieve competency specifically for the publicly funded physiotherapy workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sequential multi-methods study design. Phase 1: Physiotherapists with telehealth experience participated in a 2-round e-Delphi process to establish consensus on core capability framework domains (Round 1, <i>n</i> = 29; Round 2, <i>n</i> = 26). Phase 2: Physiotherapists (<i>n</i> = 35) subsequently rated their current knowledge and confidence for each capability item. Phase 3: Participatory focus groups, involving physiotherapists (<i>n</i> = 37) from six facilities, identified theoretical and practical domains most relevant to local contexts via thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three capability items were produced across eight domains (Compliance, Patient privacy and confidentiality, Patient safety, Technology Skills, Telehealth Delivery, Assessment and Diagnosis, Care Planning and Management, Access and Equity). Knowledge and confidence were ranked lowest within the Technology Skills domain (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 28.6%-42.9%), and highest in Telehealth Delivery (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 54.2% -80%). Focus groups identified technology skills, risk management (patient safety) and superuser support as priority areas for training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiotherapists identified additional local training competencies to compliment the 53-item capability framework. Adopting a sequential multi-methods and participatory approach successfully produced a training package framework suitable for implementation in a public outpatient setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2130-2140"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determining a capability framework and training requirements to support provision of physiotherapy via telehealth in an Australian public tertiary health setting: a multi-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Cottrell, Sarah Featherston, Kelsey Pateman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2025.2498690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inadequate clinician training and support is a primary challenge to physiotherapists' adopting telehealth. Training must be underpinned by relevant capability frameworks and co-developed to meet the needs and preferences of the existing physiotherapy workforce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Establish a capability framework for delivery of care via telehealth and understand training requirements to achieve competency specifically for the publicly funded physiotherapy workforce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sequential multi-methods study design. Phase 1: Physiotherapists with telehealth experience participated in a 2-round e-Delphi process to establish consensus on core capability framework domains (Round 1, <i>n</i> = 29; Round 2, <i>n</i> = 26). Phase 2: Physiotherapists (<i>n</i> = 35) subsequently rated their current knowledge and confidence for each capability item. Phase 3: Participatory focus groups, involving physiotherapists (<i>n</i> = 37) from six facilities, identified theoretical and practical domains most relevant to local contexts via thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three capability items were produced across eight domains (Compliance, Patient privacy and confidentiality, Patient safety, Technology Skills, Telehealth Delivery, Assessment and Diagnosis, Care Planning and Management, Access and Equity). Knowledge and confidence were ranked lowest within the Technology Skills domain (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 28.6%-42.9%), and highest in Telehealth Delivery (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 54.2% -80%). Focus groups identified technology skills, risk management (patient safety) and superuser support as priority areas for training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Physiotherapists identified additional local training competencies to compliment the 53-item capability framework. Adopting a sequential multi-methods and participatory approach successfully produced a training package framework suitable for implementation in a public outpatient setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2130-2140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2498690\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2498690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床医生培训和支持不足是物理治疗师采用远程医疗的主要挑战。培训必须以相关的能力框架为基础,并共同开发,以满足现有物理治疗人员的需求和偏好。目的:建立通过远程医疗提供护理的能力框架,并了解培训要求,以实现公共资助的物理治疗工作人员的能力。方法:序贯多方法研究设计。第1阶段:具有远程医疗经验的物理治疗师参与了2轮e-Delphi过程,以建立对核心能力框架领域的共识(第1轮,n = 29;第2轮,n = 26)。阶段2:物理治疗师(n = 35)随后对他们目前的知识和对每个能力项目的信心进行评级。第三阶段:参与性焦点小组,包括来自六个机构的物理治疗师(n = 37),通过主题分析确定与当地环境最相关的理论和实践领域。结果:在8个领域(合规性、患者隐私和保密性、患者安全、技术技能、远程医疗服务、评估和诊断、护理计划和管理、获取和公平)中产生了53个能力项目。知识和信心在技术技能领域排名最低(报告高度自信的受访者百分比= 28.6%-42.9%),在远程医疗服务领域排名最高(报告高度自信的受访者百分比= 54.2% -80%)。焦点小组确定技术技能、风险管理(患者安全)和超级用户支持是培训的优先领域。结论:物理治疗师确定了额外的本地培训能力,以补充53项能力框架。采用连续的多方法和参与性方法成功地产生了适合在公共门诊环境中实施的一揽子培训框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Determining a capability framework and training requirements to support provision of physiotherapy via telehealth in an Australian public tertiary health setting: a multi-methods study.

Background: Inadequate clinician training and support is a primary challenge to physiotherapists' adopting telehealth. Training must be underpinned by relevant capability frameworks and co-developed to meet the needs and preferences of the existing physiotherapy workforce.

Objective: Establish a capability framework for delivery of care via telehealth and understand training requirements to achieve competency specifically for the publicly funded physiotherapy workforce.

Methods: Sequential multi-methods study design. Phase 1: Physiotherapists with telehealth experience participated in a 2-round e-Delphi process to establish consensus on core capability framework domains (Round 1, n = 29; Round 2, n = 26). Phase 2: Physiotherapists (n = 35) subsequently rated their current knowledge and confidence for each capability item. Phase 3: Participatory focus groups, involving physiotherapists (n = 37) from six facilities, identified theoretical and practical domains most relevant to local contexts via thematic analysis.

Results: Fifty-three capability items were produced across eight domains (Compliance, Patient privacy and confidentiality, Patient safety, Technology Skills, Telehealth Delivery, Assessment and Diagnosis, Care Planning and Management, Access and Equity). Knowledge and confidence were ranked lowest within the Technology Skills domain (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 28.6%-42.9%), and highest in Telehealth Delivery (% respondents reporting high levels of confidence = 54.2% -80%). Focus groups identified technology skills, risk management (patient safety) and superuser support as priority areas for training.

Conclusion: Physiotherapists identified additional local training competencies to compliment the 53-item capability framework. Adopting a sequential multi-methods and participatory approach successfully produced a training package framework suitable for implementation in a public outpatient setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信