远程康复运动方案对慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者的残疾和疼痛的有效性:随机对照试验评估-盲法。

IF 1.6 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Juliene Corrêa Barbosa, Bruna Vale da Luz, Breno Felipe Portal da Silva, Amelia Pasqual Marques, Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto, Josielli Comachio, Mauricio Oliveira Magalhaes
{"title":"远程康复运动方案对慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者的残疾和疼痛的有效性:随机对照试验评估-盲法。","authors":"Juliene Corrêa Barbosa, Bruna Vale da Luz, Breno Felipe Portal da Silva, Amelia Pasqual Marques, Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto, Josielli Comachio, Mauricio Oliveira Magalhaes","doi":"10.1002/msc.70119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic neck pain is an important public health problem. Telerehabilitation has emerged as an important tool for individuals with musculoskeletal conditions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to identify the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation exercise programme compared with a digital self-care booklet on non-specific neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised controlled trial assessor-blinded, 3 months follow-up. 70 patients were randomised into two groups of 35. The telerehabilitation group received 6 weeks of individualised training through vídeo calls and an online booklet. The control group received an online booklet. The primary outcome was functional disability. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, global perceived effect, self-efficacy, quality of life, and kinesiophobia. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and a 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between groups for functional disability (Mean 10.3, CI 95% 4.8-15.7), pain intensity (Mean 2.8, CI 95% 1.4-4.1), global perceived effect (Mean -2.3, CI 95% -3.7 to -0.9), and self-efficacy (Mean -24.7, CI 95% -41.0 to -8.4) at the 6-week. At the 3-month follow-up, statistically significant differences were observed for perceived overall effect (Mean -2.0, CI 95% -3.4 to -0.6) and self-efficacy (Mean -26.3, CI 95% -42.8 to -9.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telerehabilitation is effective in improving disability and pain intensity compared with self-care booklets only in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-10h7khvk under the registration number RBR10h7khvk at 09/16/2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":46945,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Care","volume":"23 2","pages":"e70119"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Exercise Programme on Disability and Pain in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: Randomised Controlled Trial Assessor-Blinded.\",\"authors\":\"Juliene Corrêa Barbosa, Bruna Vale da Luz, Breno Felipe Portal da Silva, Amelia Pasqual Marques, Bruno Tirotti Saragiotto, Josielli Comachio, Mauricio Oliveira Magalhaes\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/msc.70119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic neck pain is an important public health problem. Telerehabilitation has emerged as an important tool for individuals with musculoskeletal conditions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aims to identify the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation exercise programme compared with a digital self-care booklet on non-specific neck pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomised controlled trial assessor-blinded, 3 months follow-up. 70 patients were randomised into two groups of 35. The telerehabilitation group received 6 weeks of individualised training through vídeo calls and an online booklet. The control group received an online booklet. The primary outcome was functional disability. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, global perceived effect, self-efficacy, quality of life, and kinesiophobia. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and a 3-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between groups for functional disability (Mean 10.3, CI 95% 4.8-15.7), pain intensity (Mean 2.8, CI 95% 1.4-4.1), global perceived effect (Mean -2.3, CI 95% -3.7 to -0.9), and self-efficacy (Mean -24.7, CI 95% -41.0 to -8.4) at the 6-week. At the 3-month follow-up, statistically significant differences were observed for perceived overall effect (Mean -2.0, CI 95% -3.4 to -0.6) and self-efficacy (Mean -26.3, CI 95% -42.8 to -9.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Telerehabilitation is effective in improving disability and pain intensity compared with self-care booklets only in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial is registered at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-10h7khvk under the registration number RBR10h7khvk at 09/16/2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"e70119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081207/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.70119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

慢性颈部疼痛是一个重要的公共卫生问题。远程康复已经成为患有肌肉骨骼疾病的个体的重要工具。目的:该研究旨在确定远程康复锻炼计划的有效性,并与非特异性颈部疼痛的数字自我保健小册子进行比较。方法:随机对照试验评估盲法,随访3个月。70例患者随机分为两组,每组35例。远程康复组通过vídeo电话和在线小册子接受了为期6周的个性化培训。对照组收到了一份在线小册子。主要结局是功能性残疾。次要结局包括疼痛强度、整体感知效应、自我效能、生活质量和运动恐惧症。所有结果在基线、6周和3个月随访时进行评估。结果:6周时,两组在功能障碍(Mean 10.3, CI 95% 4.8-15.7)、疼痛强度(Mean 2.8, CI 95% 1.4-4.1)、整体感知效果(Mean -2.3, CI 95% -3.7至-0.9)和自我效能(Mean -24.7, CI 95% -41.0至-8.4)方面存在显著差异。在3个月的随访中,观察到感知总体效果(Mean -2.0, CI 95% -3.4至-0.6)和自我效能(Mean -26.3, CI 95% -42.8至-9.8)的统计学差异。结论:与自我护理手册相比,远程康复在改善非特异性慢性颈痛患者的残疾和疼痛强度方面是有效的。试验注册:本试验于2022年9月16日在https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-10h7khvk注册,注册号为RBR10h7khvk。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Exercise Programme on Disability and Pain in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: Randomised Controlled Trial Assessor-Blinded.

Effectiveness of Telerehabilitation Exercise Programme on Disability and Pain in Patients With Chronic Non-Specific Neck Pain: Randomised Controlled Trial Assessor-Blinded.

Introduction: Chronic neck pain is an important public health problem. Telerehabilitation has emerged as an important tool for individuals with musculoskeletal conditions.

Objectives: The study aims to identify the effectiveness of a telerehabilitation exercise programme compared with a digital self-care booklet on non-specific neck pain.

Methods: A randomised controlled trial assessor-blinded, 3 months follow-up. 70 patients were randomised into two groups of 35. The telerehabilitation group received 6 weeks of individualised training through vídeo calls and an online booklet. The control group received an online booklet. The primary outcome was functional disability. Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, global perceived effect, self-efficacy, quality of life, and kinesiophobia. All outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, and a 3-month follow-up.

Results: There was a significant difference between groups for functional disability (Mean 10.3, CI 95% 4.8-15.7), pain intensity (Mean 2.8, CI 95% 1.4-4.1), global perceived effect (Mean -2.3, CI 95% -3.7 to -0.9), and self-efficacy (Mean -24.7, CI 95% -41.0 to -8.4) at the 6-week. At the 3-month follow-up, statistically significant differences were observed for perceived overall effect (Mean -2.0, CI 95% -3.4 to -0.6) and self-efficacy (Mean -26.3, CI 95% -42.8 to -9.8).

Conclusions: Telerehabilitation is effective in improving disability and pain intensity compared with self-care booklets only in individuals with non-specific chronic neck pain.

Trial registration: This trial is registered at https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-10h7khvk under the registration number RBR10h7khvk at 09/16/2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Care
Musculoskeletal Care RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Care is a peer-reviewed journal for all health professionals committed to the clinical delivery of high quality care for people with musculoskeletal conditions and providing knowledge to support decision making by professionals, patients and policy makers. This journal publishes papers on original research, applied research, review articles and clinical guidelines. Regular topics include patient education, psychological and social impact, patient experiences of health care, clinical up dates and the effectiveness of therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信