Angela Hanks Philippus, Michael Tschida, Jillian Arkoff, Benjamin Langworthy, Martin Kilbane, Kimberley R Monden
{"title":"成人四肢瘫痪患者使用辅助技术的特点和社会心理影响。","authors":"Angela Hanks Philippus, Michael Tschida, Jillian Arkoff, Benjamin Langworthy, Martin Kilbane, Kimberley R Monden","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2506138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assistive technology (AT) is essential for facilitating independence, vocational engagement, and participation among individuals with spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D). However, there is limited evidence regarding the characteristics of AT users and the impact of AT use on psychosocial outcomes after tetraplegia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the demographic/injury characteristics of AT users and the association between AT use and psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled 300 adults with tetraplegia. Surveys collected demographic/injury information, AT utilization, and psychosocial outcomes: self-efficacy (MSES), quality of life (SWLS), perceived manageability (PMNaC), participation (PART-O), fine motor functional ability (SCI-FI/AT), psychosocial impact of AT use (PIADS), and number of AT devices used. Multivariable regressions estimated the relationship between AT use and psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were mostly men (68%), with incomplete injuries (54%), and AT users (62%). Average age was 48 years, with an average of 20 years post-SCI/D. AT users tended to be younger (<i>M</i> = 46.7 vs. <i>M</i> = 50.3 non-users), women (69% vs. 57% men), had higher education (71% ≥ master's degree vs. 41% ≤ high school diploma), vocationally engaged (72% vs. 54% vocationally unengaged), and had complete injuries (77% vs. 50% incomplete). AT use was significantly associated with lower SCI-FI/AT scores (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The number of AT devices used was significantly related to higher PIADS Adaptability scores (<i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified demographic and injury-related characteristics of AT users with tetraplegia. AT use was associated with greater fine motor functional ability but no other psychosocial outcomes, while using multiple devices was associated with greater adaptability.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and psychosocial impact of assistive technology use among adults with tetraplegia.\",\"authors\":\"Angela Hanks Philippus, Michael Tschida, Jillian Arkoff, Benjamin Langworthy, Martin Kilbane, Kimberley R Monden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2025.2506138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Assistive technology (AT) is essential for facilitating independence, vocational engagement, and participation among individuals with spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D). However, there is limited evidence regarding the characteristics of AT users and the impact of AT use on psychosocial outcomes after tetraplegia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Determine the demographic/injury characteristics of AT users and the association between AT use and psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled 300 adults with tetraplegia. Surveys collected demographic/injury information, AT utilization, and psychosocial outcomes: self-efficacy (MSES), quality of life (SWLS), perceived manageability (PMNaC), participation (PART-O), fine motor functional ability (SCI-FI/AT), psychosocial impact of AT use (PIADS), and number of AT devices used. Multivariable regressions estimated the relationship between AT use and psychosocial outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were mostly men (68%), with incomplete injuries (54%), and AT users (62%). Average age was 48 years, with an average of 20 years post-SCI/D. AT users tended to be younger (<i>M</i> = 46.7 vs. <i>M</i> = 50.3 non-users), women (69% vs. 57% men), had higher education (71% ≥ master's degree vs. 41% ≤ high school diploma), vocationally engaged (72% vs. 54% vocationally unengaged), and had complete injuries (77% vs. 50% incomplete). AT use was significantly associated with lower SCI-FI/AT scores (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The number of AT devices used was significantly related to higher PIADS Adaptability scores (<i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We identified demographic and injury-related characteristics of AT users with tetraplegia. AT use was associated with greater fine motor functional ability but no other psychosocial outcomes, while using multiple devices was associated with greater adaptability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2506138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2506138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:辅助技术(AT)对于促进脊髓损伤/障碍(SCI/D)患者的独立性、职业参与和参与至关重要。然而,关于AT使用者的特征和AT使用对四肢瘫痪后心理社会结局的影响的证据有限。目的:确定AT使用者的人口学/损伤特征以及AT使用与社会心理结局之间的关系。方法:在这项前瞻性观察性研究中,我们招募了300名四肢瘫痪的成年人。调查收集了人口统计学/损伤信息、AT使用情况和社会心理结果:自我效能(MSES)、生活质量(SWLS)、感知可管理性(PMNaC)、参与(PART-O)、精细运动功能能力(科幻/AT)、AT使用的社会心理影响(PIADS)和使用AT装置的数量。多变量回归估计了AT使用与心理社会结局之间的关系。结果:参与者主要是男性(68%),不完全性损伤(54%)和AT使用者(62%)。平均年龄48岁,sci /D后平均20年。AT使用者倾向于年轻(M = 46.7 vs. M = 50.3非使用者)、女性(69% vs. 57%男性)、受过高等教育(71%≥硕士学位vs. 41%≤高中文凭)、从事职业(72% vs. 54%不从事职业)、有完全性伤害(77% vs. 50%不完全性伤害)。AT使用与较低的科幻/AT分数显著相关(p p = 0.01)。结论:我们确定了四肢瘫痪AT使用者的人口学特征和损伤相关特征。使用AT与更大的精细运动功能能力相关,但没有其他社会心理结果,而使用多种设备与更大的适应性相关。
Characteristics and psychosocial impact of assistive technology use among adults with tetraplegia.
Background: Assistive technology (AT) is essential for facilitating independence, vocational engagement, and participation among individuals with spinal cord injury/disorder (SCI/D). However, there is limited evidence regarding the characteristics of AT users and the impact of AT use on psychosocial outcomes after tetraplegia.
Objective: Determine the demographic/injury characteristics of AT users and the association between AT use and psychosocial outcomes.
Methods: In this prospective, observational study, we enrolled 300 adults with tetraplegia. Surveys collected demographic/injury information, AT utilization, and psychosocial outcomes: self-efficacy (MSES), quality of life (SWLS), perceived manageability (PMNaC), participation (PART-O), fine motor functional ability (SCI-FI/AT), psychosocial impact of AT use (PIADS), and number of AT devices used. Multivariable regressions estimated the relationship between AT use and psychosocial outcomes.
Results: Participants were mostly men (68%), with incomplete injuries (54%), and AT users (62%). Average age was 48 years, with an average of 20 years post-SCI/D. AT users tended to be younger (M = 46.7 vs. M = 50.3 non-users), women (69% vs. 57% men), had higher education (71% ≥ master's degree vs. 41% ≤ high school diploma), vocationally engaged (72% vs. 54% vocationally unengaged), and had complete injuries (77% vs. 50% incomplete). AT use was significantly associated with lower SCI-FI/AT scores (p < 0.01). The number of AT devices used was significantly related to higher PIADS Adaptability scores (p = 0.01).
Conclusions: We identified demographic and injury-related characteristics of AT users with tetraplegia. AT use was associated with greater fine motor functional ability but no other psychosocial outcomes, while using multiple devices was associated with greater adaptability.