家庭参与干预对乳腺癌妇女及其照顾者癌症复发管理的恐惧:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Xiaofan Bu, Ling Jiang, Doris Y P Leung
{"title":"家庭参与干预对乳腺癌妇女及其照顾者癌症复发管理的恐惧:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xiaofan Bu, Ling Jiang, Doris Y P Leung","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family strengths can be used to help families adapt to hardship and strain. However, meta-analytic evidence of the effectiveness of family involvement interventions on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in women with breast cancer and their caregivers is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of family involvement interventions on FCR in women with breast cancer and their caregivers and to identify the characteristics of effective family involvement interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten electronic databases were searched from database inception to October 2023. The updated Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data analyses were executed with Revman 5.3 software, and subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of interventional dosage. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 checklist was employed to provide guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the review, and six were included in the meta-analysis. The main contents included content related to the disclosure of disease-related feelings/worries/concerns/experiences, education/psychological support plus some disclosure and education/counselling based on disclosure content. The results of the meta-analysis showed that family involvement interventions have large short-term positive effects on relieving FCR in women with breast cancer. The pooled results of subgroup analysis demonstrated that compared with usual care, education/psychological support plus some disclosure is ineffective, and disclosure alone has a moderate-to-large effect size, whereas disclosure with education or counselling targeting the specific needs of participants has an extremely large effect size. Only one study focused on FCR in caregivers, with an unfavourable result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family involvement interventions, especially those using disclosure combined with education or counselling targeting their specific needs, have considerable short-term effects on women's FCR alleviation. However, the evidence in caregivers is insufficient. Only a few interventional studies targeting patients and caregivers exist. Further high-quality RCTs with follow-ups are encouraged.</p><p><strong>Patient and public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Family Involvement Interventions on Fear of Cancer Recurrence Management Among Women With Breast Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofan Bu, Ling Jiang, Doris Y P Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Family strengths can be used to help families adapt to hardship and strain. However, meta-analytic evidence of the effectiveness of family involvement interventions on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in women with breast cancer and their caregivers is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of family involvement interventions on FCR in women with breast cancer and their caregivers and to identify the characteristics of effective family involvement interventions.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Ten electronic databases were searched from database inception to October 2023. The updated Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data analyses were executed with Revman 5.3 software, and subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of interventional dosage. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 checklist was employed to provide guidance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies were included in the review, and six were included in the meta-analysis. The main contents included content related to the disclosure of disease-related feelings/worries/concerns/experiences, education/psychological support plus some disclosure and education/counselling based on disclosure content. The results of the meta-analysis showed that family involvement interventions have large short-term positive effects on relieving FCR in women with breast cancer. The pooled results of subgroup analysis demonstrated that compared with usual care, education/psychological support plus some disclosure is ineffective, and disclosure alone has a moderate-to-large effect size, whereas disclosure with education or counselling targeting the specific needs of participants has an extremely large effect size. Only one study focused on FCR in caregivers, with an unfavourable result.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Family involvement interventions, especially those using disclosure combined with education or counselling targeting their specific needs, have considerable short-term effects on women's FCR alleviation. However, the evidence in caregivers is insufficient. Only a few interventional studies targeting patients and caregivers exist. Further high-quality RCTs with follow-ups are encouraged.</p><p><strong>Patient and public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17790\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17790","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家庭力量可以用来帮助家庭适应困难和压力。然而,关于家庭参与干预对乳腺癌妇女及其照顾者癌症复发恐惧(FCR)有效性的meta分析证据缺乏。目的:评价家庭参与干预对乳腺癌患者及其照顾者FCR的影响,并探讨有效家庭参与干预的特点。方法:检索自数据库建立至2023年10月的10个电子数据库。使用更新的Cochrane风险偏倚工具评估纳入的随机对照试验(RCTs)的质量。采用Revman 5.3软件进行数据分析,并根据介入剂量进行亚组分析。采用2020年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目清单提供指导。结果:7项研究被纳入综述,6项研究被纳入meta分析。主要内容包括与疾病相关的感受/担忧/担忧/经历的披露、教育/心理支持以及在披露内容基础上的一些披露和教育/咨询。荟萃分析的结果显示,家庭参与干预对缓解乳腺癌妇女的FCR有很大的短期积极作用。亚组分析的汇总结果表明,与常规护理相比,教育/心理支持加一些披露是无效的,单独披露具有中等到较大的效应量,而针对参与者特定需求的教育或咨询披露具有极大的效应量。只有一项研究关注照顾者的FCR,结果不利。结论:家庭参与干预措施,特别是那些利用披露与针对其特定需求的教育或咨询相结合的干预措施,对减轻妇女的FCR具有相当大的短期效果。然而,护理人员的证据不足。只有少数针对患者和护理人员的介入性研究存在。鼓励进一步进行高质量的随机对照试验,并进行随访。患者及公众贡献:无患者及公众贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Family Involvement Interventions on Fear of Cancer Recurrence Management Among Women With Breast Cancer and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Family strengths can be used to help families adapt to hardship and strain. However, meta-analytic evidence of the effectiveness of family involvement interventions on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) in women with breast cancer and their caregivers is lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of family involvement interventions on FCR in women with breast cancer and their caregivers and to identify the characteristics of effective family involvement interventions.

Method: Ten electronic databases were searched from database inception to October 2023. The updated Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the quality of the included randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Data analyses were executed with Revman 5.3 software, and subgroup analyses were performed on the basis of interventional dosage. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis 2020 checklist was employed to provide guidance.

Results: Seven studies were included in the review, and six were included in the meta-analysis. The main contents included content related to the disclosure of disease-related feelings/worries/concerns/experiences, education/psychological support plus some disclosure and education/counselling based on disclosure content. The results of the meta-analysis showed that family involvement interventions have large short-term positive effects on relieving FCR in women with breast cancer. The pooled results of subgroup analysis demonstrated that compared with usual care, education/psychological support plus some disclosure is ineffective, and disclosure alone has a moderate-to-large effect size, whereas disclosure with education or counselling targeting the specific needs of participants has an extremely large effect size. Only one study focused on FCR in caregivers, with an unfavourable result.

Conclusions: Family involvement interventions, especially those using disclosure combined with education or counselling targeting their specific needs, have considerable short-term effects on women's FCR alleviation. However, the evidence in caregivers is insufficient. Only a few interventional studies targeting patients and caregivers exist. Further high-quality RCTs with follow-ups are encouraged.

Patient and public contribution: No patient or public contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信