成人慢性肾脏疾病症状评估和监测的电子健康解决方案:系统综述。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Khanh Linh Bui, Louise Purtell, Areum Hyun, Ann Bonner
{"title":"成人慢性肾脏疾病症状评估和监测的电子健康解决方案:系统综述。","authors":"Khanh Linh Bui, Louise Purtell, Areum Hyun, Ann Bonner","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This systematic review examined eHealth solutions used to assess and monitor symptoms among adults with CKD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA checklist. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202452973).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched for English language studies that reported eHealth solutions for symptom assessment and monitoring in CKD between January 2000 and May 2024. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and a co-design evaluation tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight studies involving 4345 participants with CKD were included. Most of the included studies were non-randomised controlled trials (n = 16) and non-experimental studies (n = 13); only a few studies (n = 9) were randomised controlled trials. Current eHealth solutions varied in technologies and functions but were primarily focused on self-monitoring (n = 22), data recording (n = 14), education (n = 13), providing information (n = 10) and reminders/alerts (n = 10). There was limited evidence from few intervention studies involving eHealth solutions showing improvements in CKD symptoms and/or health-related quality of life. Among the 14 studies that assessed user satisfaction, satisfaction was high, but challenges and barriers to implementing these solutions were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>eHealth solutions have the potential to facilitate symptom assessment and monitoring for adults with CKD, but further high-quality experimental studies are required to provide better evidence in practice.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>eHealth symptom assessment and monitoring are increasing in practice. While some adults are willing and able to use eHealth solutions, barriers remain due to limited digital health literacy. As few randomised controlled trials exist, further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of reducing chronic kidney disease symptom burden.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"eHealth Solutions for Symptom Assessment and Monitoring in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Khanh Linh Bui, Louise Purtell, Areum Hyun, Ann Bonner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This systematic review examined eHealth solutions used to assess and monitor symptoms among adults with CKD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA checklist. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202452973).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven databases were searched for English language studies that reported eHealth solutions for symptom assessment and monitoring in CKD between January 2000 and May 2024. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and a co-design evaluation tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight studies involving 4345 participants with CKD were included. Most of the included studies were non-randomised controlled trials (n = 16) and non-experimental studies (n = 13); only a few studies (n = 9) were randomised controlled trials. Current eHealth solutions varied in technologies and functions but were primarily focused on self-monitoring (n = 22), data recording (n = 14), education (n = 13), providing information (n = 10) and reminders/alerts (n = 10). There was limited evidence from few intervention studies involving eHealth solutions showing improvements in CKD symptoms and/or health-related quality of life. Among the 14 studies that assessed user satisfaction, satisfaction was high, but challenges and barriers to implementing these solutions were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>eHealth solutions have the potential to facilitate symptom assessment and monitoring for adults with CKD, but further high-quality experimental studies are required to provide better evidence in practice.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>eHealth symptom assessment and monitoring are increasing in practice. While some adults are willing and able to use eHealth solutions, barriers remain due to limited digital health literacy. As few randomised controlled trials exist, further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of reducing chronic kidney disease symptom burden.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No Patient or Public Contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17827\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述检查了用于评估和监测成人慢性肾病症状的电子健康解决方案。设计:根据PRISMA检查表进行系统评价并报告。该审查方案已在PROSPERO注册(CRD4202452973)。方法:检索7个数据库,检索2000年1月至2024年5月期间报告了用于CKD症状评估和监测的eHealth解决方案的英语研究。使用混合方法评估工具和共同设计评估工具评估研究的方法学质量。结果:38项研究纳入了4345名CKD患者。大多数纳入的研究为非随机对照试验(n = 16)和非实验研究(n = 13);只有少数研究(n = 9)是随机对照试验。目前的电子健康解决方案在技术和功能上各不相同,但主要侧重于自我监测(n = 22)、数据记录(n = 14)、教育(n = 13)、提供信息(n = 10)和提醒/警报(n = 10)。涉及电子健康解决方案的干预研究证据有限,表明CKD症状和/或与健康相关的生活质量得到改善。在评估用户满意度的14项研究中,满意度很高,但报告了实施这些解决方案的挑战和障碍。结论:电子健康解决方案有可能促进成人慢性肾病的症状评估和监测,但需要进一步的高质量实验研究来提供更好的实践证据。总结:电子健康症状评估和监测在实践中越来越多。虽然一些成年人愿意并能够使用电子健康解决方案,但由于数字健康素养有限,障碍仍然存在。由于现有的随机对照试验很少,需要进一步的研究来评估减轻慢性肾脏疾病症状负担的益处。患者或公众捐赠:无患者或公众捐赠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
eHealth Solutions for Symptom Assessment and Monitoring in Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review.

Aims: This systematic review examined eHealth solutions used to assess and monitor symptoms among adults with CKD.

Design: A systematic review was conducted and reported in accordance with the PRISMA checklist. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD4202452973).

Methods: Seven databases were searched for English language studies that reported eHealth solutions for symptom assessment and monitoring in CKD between January 2000 and May 2024. The methodological quality of studies was evaluated using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and a co-design evaluation tool.

Results: Thirty-eight studies involving 4345 participants with CKD were included. Most of the included studies were non-randomised controlled trials (n = 16) and non-experimental studies (n = 13); only a few studies (n = 9) were randomised controlled trials. Current eHealth solutions varied in technologies and functions but were primarily focused on self-monitoring (n = 22), data recording (n = 14), education (n = 13), providing information (n = 10) and reminders/alerts (n = 10). There was limited evidence from few intervention studies involving eHealth solutions showing improvements in CKD symptoms and/or health-related quality of life. Among the 14 studies that assessed user satisfaction, satisfaction was high, but challenges and barriers to implementing these solutions were reported.

Conclusion: eHealth solutions have the potential to facilitate symptom assessment and monitoring for adults with CKD, but further high-quality experimental studies are required to provide better evidence in practice.

Summary: eHealth symptom assessment and monitoring are increasing in practice. While some adults are willing and able to use eHealth solutions, barriers remain due to limited digital health literacy. As few randomised controlled trials exist, further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of reducing chronic kidney disease symptom burden.

Patient or public contribution: No Patient or Public Contribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信