{"title":"当会话频率有限时,检查长时间暴露的结果:来自退伍军人样本的初步发现。","authors":"Charles A Hayes, Rachel K Bieu, Ryan W Schroeder","doi":"10.1080/08995605.2025.2502182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unlike in efficacy trials, there can be notable variability in session frequency when PTSD treatment protocols, such a Prolonged Exposure (PE), are disseminated in clinical practice. The current study aimed to examine the impact of PE session frequency on treatment outcomes in a clinical Veteran sample. This study utilized retrospective data drawn from the Veterans Health Administration's Corporate Data Warehouse, a national data repository which includes Electronic Health Records. The extracted cohort of 648 Veterans was majority White-non-Hispanic and male [(<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 55.66 (14.08)]. All Veterans had a diagnosis of PTSD and completed in-person PE in outpatient Veterans Affairs behavioral health clinics between 2017 and 2018. The treatment outcome measure was the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Linear multiple regression analyses did not find that session frequency predicted treatment outcome. Likewise, t-test results did not find differences in PCL-5 change scores based on session frequency. Effect sizes for pre- to post-treatment PCL-5 change scores ranged from <i>d</i> = 1.25 to 1.40. Overall, the current study suggests that PE may still be a useful intervention even when the treatment manual recommendation of weekly or twice weekly sessions cannot feasibly be conducted in clinical practice. Cross-validation is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18696,"journal":{"name":"Military Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining prolonged exposure outcomes when session frequency is limited: Preliminary findings from a Veteran sample.\",\"authors\":\"Charles A Hayes, Rachel K Bieu, Ryan W Schroeder\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08995605.2025.2502182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Unlike in efficacy trials, there can be notable variability in session frequency when PTSD treatment protocols, such a Prolonged Exposure (PE), are disseminated in clinical practice. The current study aimed to examine the impact of PE session frequency on treatment outcomes in a clinical Veteran sample. This study utilized retrospective data drawn from the Veterans Health Administration's Corporate Data Warehouse, a national data repository which includes Electronic Health Records. The extracted cohort of 648 Veterans was majority White-non-Hispanic and male [(<i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 55.66 (14.08)]. All Veterans had a diagnosis of PTSD and completed in-person PE in outpatient Veterans Affairs behavioral health clinics between 2017 and 2018. The treatment outcome measure was the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Linear multiple regression analyses did not find that session frequency predicted treatment outcome. Likewise, t-test results did not find differences in PCL-5 change scores based on session frequency. Effect sizes for pre- to post-treatment PCL-5 change scores ranged from <i>d</i> = 1.25 to 1.40. Overall, the current study suggests that PE may still be a useful intervention even when the treatment manual recommendation of weekly or twice weekly sessions cannot feasibly be conducted in clinical practice. Cross-validation is needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Military Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Military Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2502182\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2025.2502182","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining prolonged exposure outcomes when session frequency is limited: Preliminary findings from a Veteran sample.
Unlike in efficacy trials, there can be notable variability in session frequency when PTSD treatment protocols, such a Prolonged Exposure (PE), are disseminated in clinical practice. The current study aimed to examine the impact of PE session frequency on treatment outcomes in a clinical Veteran sample. This study utilized retrospective data drawn from the Veterans Health Administration's Corporate Data Warehouse, a national data repository which includes Electronic Health Records. The extracted cohort of 648 Veterans was majority White-non-Hispanic and male [(Mage = 55.66 (14.08)]. All Veterans had a diagnosis of PTSD and completed in-person PE in outpatient Veterans Affairs behavioral health clinics between 2017 and 2018. The treatment outcome measure was the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5). Linear multiple regression analyses did not find that session frequency predicted treatment outcome. Likewise, t-test results did not find differences in PCL-5 change scores based on session frequency. Effect sizes for pre- to post-treatment PCL-5 change scores ranged from d = 1.25 to 1.40. Overall, the current study suggests that PE may still be a useful intervention even when the treatment manual recommendation of weekly or twice weekly sessions cannot feasibly be conducted in clinical practice. Cross-validation is needed.
期刊介绍:
Military Psychology is the quarterly journal of Division 19 (Society for Military Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. The journal seeks to facilitate the scientific development of military psychology by encouraging communication between researchers and practitioners. The domain of military psychology is the conduct of research or practice of psychological principles within a military environment. The journal publishes behavioral science research articles having military applications in the areas of clinical and health psychology, training and human factors, manpower and personnel, social and organizational systems, and testing and measurement.