大肝外伤开腹负压治疗的安全性和可行性:一项回顾性中心研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Andrea Coppola, Arianna Mottola, Marcello Della Corte, Mariafelicia Valeriani, Giovanni Aprea, Patrizio Festa, Giuseppe Palomba
{"title":"大肝外伤开腹负压治疗的安全性和可行性:一项回顾性中心研究。","authors":"Andrea Coppola, Arianna Mottola, Marcello Della Corte, Mariafelicia Valeriani, Giovanni Aprea, Patrizio Festa, Giuseppe Palomba","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03729-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal trauma is the third leading cause of death in the young population, and liver trauma is among the most common. For major liver injury, perihepatic packing (PHP) is a life-saving procedure that allows rapid control of the hemorrhage. The use of the open abdomen (OA) represents a strategy for the management of major abdominal trauma. However, the effects of combined use with Negative Pressure Therapy (NPT) in patients with liver trauma are not yet clear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of OA with NPT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective bicenter study enrolled all patients affected by liver trauma who underwent operative management from January 2019 to September 2023 at the Emergency Surgical Units of the \"A. Cardarelli\" Hospital in Naples and the \"San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona\" in Salerno. The two groups were compared in terms of intra- and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 213 patients with liver trauma, 43 patients were divided into two groups: group A (24 patients treated with PHP and OA) and group B (19 patients with PHP, OA and NPT). There were no significant differences in terms of demographic data, preoperative characteristics, length of stay, mortality, or intraoperative or postoperative complications. Hb increase at the time of depacking was higher in group B (p = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Open Abdomen with Negative Pressure Therapy appears safe and feasible. Furthermore, it does not affect mortality or hospital stay but it seems to be associated with higher hemoglobin (Hb) levels during the depacking phase.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and feasibility of open abdomen with negative pressure therapy in major liver trauma: a retrospective bicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Coppola, Arianna Mottola, Marcello Della Corte, Mariafelicia Valeriani, Giovanni Aprea, Patrizio Festa, Giuseppe Palomba\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03729-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Abdominal trauma is the third leading cause of death in the young population, and liver trauma is among the most common. For major liver injury, perihepatic packing (PHP) is a life-saving procedure that allows rapid control of the hemorrhage. The use of the open abdomen (OA) represents a strategy for the management of major abdominal trauma. However, the effects of combined use with Negative Pressure Therapy (NPT) in patients with liver trauma are not yet clear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of OA with NPT.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective bicenter study enrolled all patients affected by liver trauma who underwent operative management from January 2019 to September 2023 at the Emergency Surgical Units of the \\\"A. Cardarelli\\\" Hospital in Naples and the \\\"San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona\\\" in Salerno. The two groups were compared in terms of intra- and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of a total of 213 patients with liver trauma, 43 patients were divided into two groups: group A (24 patients treated with PHP and OA) and group B (19 patients with PHP, OA and NPT). There were no significant differences in terms of demographic data, preoperative characteristics, length of stay, mortality, or intraoperative or postoperative complications. Hb increase at the time of depacking was higher in group B (p = 0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Open Abdomen with Negative Pressure Therapy appears safe and feasible. Furthermore, it does not affect mortality or hospital stay but it seems to be associated with higher hemoglobin (Hb) levels during the depacking phase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084237/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03729-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03729-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腹部创伤是年轻人死亡的第三大原因,肝创伤是最常见的原因之一。对于严重的肝损伤,肝周填塞(PHP)是一种挽救生命的方法,可以快速控制出血。开腹手术(OA)的使用代表了一种处理重大腹部创伤的策略。然而,与负压治疗(NPT)联合使用对肝外伤患者的影响尚不清楚。我们研究的目的是评估OA与NPT的安全性和可行性。材料和方法:本回顾性中心研究纳入了2019年1月至2023年9月在那不勒斯“A. Cardarelli”医院和萨莱诺“San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d’aragona”急诊外科单元接受手术治疗的所有肝损伤患者。比较两组患者的手术内和术后结果。结果:213例肝外伤患者中,43例患者分为两组:a组(PHP + OA治疗24例)和B组(PHP + OA + NPT治疗19例)。在人口学数据、术前特征、住院时间、死亡率、术中或术后并发症方面没有显著差异。B组在脱包时Hb升高较高(p = 0.039)。结论:开腹负压治疗安全可行。此外,它不影响死亡率或住院时间,但似乎与脱包阶段较高的血红蛋白(Hb)水平有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and feasibility of open abdomen with negative pressure therapy in major liver trauma: a retrospective bicenter study.

Background: Abdominal trauma is the third leading cause of death in the young population, and liver trauma is among the most common. For major liver injury, perihepatic packing (PHP) is a life-saving procedure that allows rapid control of the hemorrhage. The use of the open abdomen (OA) represents a strategy for the management of major abdominal trauma. However, the effects of combined use with Negative Pressure Therapy (NPT) in patients with liver trauma are not yet clear. The aim of our study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of OA with NPT.

Materials and methods: This retrospective bicenter study enrolled all patients affected by liver trauma who underwent operative management from January 2019 to September 2023 at the Emergency Surgical Units of the "A. Cardarelli" Hospital in Naples and the "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona" in Salerno. The two groups were compared in terms of intra- and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Out of a total of 213 patients with liver trauma, 43 patients were divided into two groups: group A (24 patients treated with PHP and OA) and group B (19 patients with PHP, OA and NPT). There were no significant differences in terms of demographic data, preoperative characteristics, length of stay, mortality, or intraoperative or postoperative complications. Hb increase at the time of depacking was higher in group B (p = 0.039).

Conclusions: Open Abdomen with Negative Pressure Therapy appears safe and feasible. Furthermore, it does not affect mortality or hospital stay but it seems to be associated with higher hemoglobin (Hb) levels during the depacking phase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信