开窗式和开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术的性别差异。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Mohit K Manchella, Vinamr Rastogi, Brandon Gaston, Shaghayegh S Kermani, Nikolaos Zacharias, Tiffany R Bellomo, Anahita Dua
{"title":"开窗式和开放式腹主动脉瘤修复术的性别差异。","authors":"Mohit K Manchella, Vinamr Rastogi, Brandon Gaston, Shaghayegh S Kermani, Nikolaos Zacharias, Tiffany R Bellomo, Anahita Dua","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to investigate if benefits in patient outcomes conferred by endovascular repair compared to open repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA) are maintained across genders. We undertook a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes between open repair and fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR) utilizing the Cook Zenith Fenestrated (ZFEN) graft for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry, including patients who underwent open repair or ZFEN for cAAA between 2011 and 2022. The study population stratified by sex contained 1,697 males and 663 females. Perioperative outcomes such as mortality, complications, and reoperation rates were analyzed using inverse probability weighting and logistic regression to adjust for confounding indications for surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among males, those undergoing ZFEN had significantly lower odds of major complications (14% vs. 28%, aOR 0.43, p<.001), reoperation (6.0% vs. 12%, aOR 0.46, p=.03), and major respiratory complications (5.5% vs. 12%, aOR 0.42, p=.02) compared to open repair. In females, the trend towards reduced major complications with ZFEN (19% vs. 31%, aOR 0.50, p=.06) did not reach statistical significance. When comparing males to females undergoing open repair, males had 6.7 times higher odds of myocardial infarction, and 16 times higher odds of wound complications compared to females. Conversely, females undergoing ZFEN had higher odds of reoperation compared to males (12% vs. 4.1%, aOR 0.13, p=.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights significant sex-specific differences in outcomes following both ZFEN and open repair for cAAA. ZFEN offers notable advantages in reducing complications for male patients, while its benefits are less pronounced in females. These findings underscore the need for tailored treatment strategies and further research to optimize outcomes for female patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Stratified Outcome Differences Between Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Repair for Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Mohit K Manchella, Vinamr Rastogi, Brandon Gaston, Shaghayegh S Kermani, Nikolaos Zacharias, Tiffany R Bellomo, Anahita Dua\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to investigate if benefits in patient outcomes conferred by endovascular repair compared to open repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA) are maintained across genders. We undertook a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes between open repair and fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR) utilizing the Cook Zenith Fenestrated (ZFEN) graft for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry, including patients who underwent open repair or ZFEN for cAAA between 2011 and 2022. The study population stratified by sex contained 1,697 males and 663 females. Perioperative outcomes such as mortality, complications, and reoperation rates were analyzed using inverse probability weighting and logistic regression to adjust for confounding indications for surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among males, those undergoing ZFEN had significantly lower odds of major complications (14% vs. 28%, aOR 0.43, p<.001), reoperation (6.0% vs. 12%, aOR 0.46, p=.03), and major respiratory complications (5.5% vs. 12%, aOR 0.42, p=.02) compared to open repair. In females, the trend towards reduced major complications with ZFEN (19% vs. 31%, aOR 0.50, p=.06) did not reach statistical significance. When comparing males to females undergoing open repair, males had 6.7 times higher odds of myocardial infarction, and 16 times higher odds of wound complications compared to females. Conversely, females undergoing ZFEN had higher odds of reoperation compared to males (12% vs. 4.1%, aOR 0.13, p=.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights significant sex-specific differences in outcomes following both ZFEN and open repair for cAAA. ZFEN offers notable advantages in reducing complications for male patients, while its benefits are less pronounced in females. These findings underscore the need for tailored treatment strategies and further research to optimize outcomes for female patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2025.05.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究旨在探讨在复杂腹主动脉瘤(cAAA)的患者结局中,血管内修复术与开放式修复术相比是否能在性别上保持优势。我们对复杂腹主动脉瘤(cAAA)采用Cook Zenith开窗(ZFEN)移植物进行开放式修复和开窗血管内修复(FEVAR)的围手术期结果进行了比较分析。方法:回顾性队列研究使用来自国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)登记处的数据,包括2011年至2022年间接受开放式修复或ZFEN治疗cAAA的患者。按性别分层的研究人群包括1,697名男性和663名女性。围手术期结果,如死亡率、并发症和再手术率,采用逆概率加权和逻辑回归进行分析,以调整手术的混杂指征。结果:在男性中,接受ZFEN治疗的患者出现主要并发症的几率明显较低(14% vs. 28%, aOR 0.43)。结论:该研究强调了ZFEN治疗和开放式修复cAAA后的结果存在显著的性别差异。ZFEN在减少男性患者并发症方面具有显著优势,而对女性患者的益处则不太明显。这些发现强调了定制治疗策略和进一步研究的必要性,以优化接受主动脉瘤修复的女性患者的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sex Stratified Outcome Differences Between Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair and Open Repair for Juxtarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Introduction: This study aims to investigate if benefits in patient outcomes conferred by endovascular repair compared to open repair of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA) are maintained across genders. We undertook a comparative analysis of perioperative outcomes between open repair and fenestrated endovascular repair (FEVAR) utilizing the Cook Zenith Fenestrated (ZFEN) graft for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (cAAA).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) registry, including patients who underwent open repair or ZFEN for cAAA between 2011 and 2022. The study population stratified by sex contained 1,697 males and 663 females. Perioperative outcomes such as mortality, complications, and reoperation rates were analyzed using inverse probability weighting and logistic regression to adjust for confounding indications for surgery.

Results: Among males, those undergoing ZFEN had significantly lower odds of major complications (14% vs. 28%, aOR 0.43, p<.001), reoperation (6.0% vs. 12%, aOR 0.46, p=.03), and major respiratory complications (5.5% vs. 12%, aOR 0.42, p=.02) compared to open repair. In females, the trend towards reduced major complications with ZFEN (19% vs. 31%, aOR 0.50, p=.06) did not reach statistical significance. When comparing males to females undergoing open repair, males had 6.7 times higher odds of myocardial infarction, and 16 times higher odds of wound complications compared to females. Conversely, females undergoing ZFEN had higher odds of reoperation compared to males (12% vs. 4.1%, aOR 0.13, p=.012).

Conclusions: The study highlights significant sex-specific differences in outcomes following both ZFEN and open repair for cAAA. ZFEN offers notable advantages in reducing complications for male patients, while its benefits are less pronounced in females. These findings underscore the need for tailored treatment strategies and further research to optimize outcomes for female patients undergoing aortic aneurysm repair.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信