急诊医疗机构转运急性脑卒中患者的预通知与治疗时间的关系

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Young Ju Jeong, Ki Hong Kim, Jeong Ho Park, Young Sun Ro, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin
{"title":"急诊医疗机构转运急性脑卒中患者的预通知与治疗时间的关系","authors":"Young Ju Jeong, Ki Hong Kim, Jeong Ho Park, Young Sun Ro, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute stroke is a major health burden and prompt management at the emergency department (ED) is crucial for favorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the associations between prehospital notification to the ED and time to management in acute ischemic stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute ischemic stroke who visited a thrombolysis-available ED through an emergency medical service (EMS) from July 2020 to December 2021 were included. The main exposure was prenotification by EMS personnel. The primary outcome was the time to management in acute stroke care metrics in ED-stroke critical pathway (CP) activation, brain radiographic evaluation, intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and stroke unit admission. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1107 acute ischemic stroke patients were included. The time to management was shorter in the prenotification group than in the control group; CP activation was 10 vs. 13.5 min, brain radiographic evaluation was 27 vs. 35 min, intravenous thrombolysis was 50.5 vs. 56.5 min, mechanical thrombectomy was 126.5 vs. 151.0 min, and stroke unit admission was 270.5 vs. 295.5 min. The prenotification group had a greater probability of a shorter time to management: Estimate (95% confidence intervals) was -15.7 min (-22.7 to -8.8) for CP activation, -13.8 min (-19.9 to -7.6) for brain radiographic evaluation, -20.9 min (-32.6 to -9.2) for intravenous thrombolysis, -81.6 min (-149.0 to -14.2) for mechanical thrombectomy, and -20.8 (-66.7 to -25.1) for stroke unit admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In acute ischemic stroke patients, prehospital prenotification was found to be associated with a shorter time to management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations Between Prenotification and Time to Management in Acute Stroke Patients Transported by Emergency Medical Services.\",\"authors\":\"Young Ju Jeong, Ki Hong Kim, Jeong Ho Park, Young Sun Ro, Kyoung Jun Song, Sang Do Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.02.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute stroke is a major health burden and prompt management at the emergency department (ED) is crucial for favorable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the associations between prehospital notification to the ED and time to management in acute ischemic stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with acute ischemic stroke who visited a thrombolysis-available ED through an emergency medical service (EMS) from July 2020 to December 2021 were included. The main exposure was prenotification by EMS personnel. The primary outcome was the time to management in acute stroke care metrics in ED-stroke critical pathway (CP) activation, brain radiographic evaluation, intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and stroke unit admission. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1107 acute ischemic stroke patients were included. The time to management was shorter in the prenotification group than in the control group; CP activation was 10 vs. 13.5 min, brain radiographic evaluation was 27 vs. 35 min, intravenous thrombolysis was 50.5 vs. 56.5 min, mechanical thrombectomy was 126.5 vs. 151.0 min, and stroke unit admission was 270.5 vs. 295.5 min. The prenotification group had a greater probability of a shorter time to management: Estimate (95% confidence intervals) was -15.7 min (-22.7 to -8.8) for CP activation, -13.8 min (-19.9 to -7.6) for brain radiographic evaluation, -20.9 min (-32.6 to -9.2) for intravenous thrombolysis, -81.6 min (-149.0 to -14.2) for mechanical thrombectomy, and -20.8 (-66.7 to -25.1) for stroke unit admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In acute ischemic stroke patients, prehospital prenotification was found to be associated with a shorter time to management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.02.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2025.02.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性脑卒中是一种主要的健康负担,急诊科(ED)的及时管理对于良好的预后至关重要。目的:本研究旨在评估急性缺血性脑卒中患者院前通知急诊科与处理时间之间的关系。方法:纳入2020年7月至2021年12月通过急诊医疗服务(EMS)访问可溶栓的急诊科的急性缺血性卒中患者。主要暴露是EMS人员的预先通报。主要结局是ed -卒中关键通路(CP)激活、脑x线评估、静脉溶栓、机械取栓和卒中住院的急性卒中护理指标管理时间。进行多变量线性回归分析。结果:共纳入急性缺血性脑卒中患者1107例。预通知组到管理的时间比对照组短;CP激活时间为10 vs. 13.5分钟,脑x线评估时间为27 vs. 35分钟,静脉溶栓时间为50.5 vs. 56.5分钟,机械取栓时间为126.5 vs. 151.0分钟,卒中单位入院时间为270.5 vs. 295.5分钟。预先通知组更有可能缩短治疗时间:CP激活的估计(95%置信区间)为-15.7分钟(-22.7至-8.8),脑x线评估的估计为-13.8分钟(-19.9至-7.6),静脉溶栓的估计为-20.9分钟(-32.6至-9.2),机械取栓的估计为-81.6分钟(-149.0至-14.2),卒中单位入院的估计为-20.8分钟(-66.7至-25.1)。结论:在急性缺血性脑卒中患者中,院前预通报与较短的治疗时间有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations Between Prenotification and Time to Management in Acute Stroke Patients Transported by Emergency Medical Services.

Background: Acute stroke is a major health burden and prompt management at the emergency department (ED) is crucial for favorable outcomes.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the associations between prehospital notification to the ED and time to management in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Methods: Patients with acute ischemic stroke who visited a thrombolysis-available ED through an emergency medical service (EMS) from July 2020 to December 2021 were included. The main exposure was prenotification by EMS personnel. The primary outcome was the time to management in acute stroke care metrics in ED-stroke critical pathway (CP) activation, brain radiographic evaluation, intravenous thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, and stroke unit admission. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted.

Results: A total of 1107 acute ischemic stroke patients were included. The time to management was shorter in the prenotification group than in the control group; CP activation was 10 vs. 13.5 min, brain radiographic evaluation was 27 vs. 35 min, intravenous thrombolysis was 50.5 vs. 56.5 min, mechanical thrombectomy was 126.5 vs. 151.0 min, and stroke unit admission was 270.5 vs. 295.5 min. The prenotification group had a greater probability of a shorter time to management: Estimate (95% confidence intervals) was -15.7 min (-22.7 to -8.8) for CP activation, -13.8 min (-19.9 to -7.6) for brain radiographic evaluation, -20.9 min (-32.6 to -9.2) for intravenous thrombolysis, -81.6 min (-149.0 to -14.2) for mechanical thrombectomy, and -20.8 (-66.7 to -25.1) for stroke unit admission.

Conclusion: In acute ischemic stroke patients, prehospital prenotification was found to be associated with a shorter time to management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信