Nezar A Althagafi, Abdullah Alqarni, Majed Albadi, Rawan Aldhabi, Umar Alabasi
{"title":"翻译,跨文化适应,并验证阿拉伯版本的脚和脚踝能力测量(FAAM-AR)。","authors":"Nezar A Althagafi, Abdullah Alqarni, Majed Albadi, Rawan Aldhabi, Umar Alabasi","doi":"10.1177/10538127251339166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThis study aimed to cross-cultural translate the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure to Arabic version (FAAM-AR) and to assess the psychometric properties of the FAAM-AR in a sample of Arabic-speaking participants.MethodologyThe FAAM-AR was translated according to the International Society for Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) guidelines. To determine construct validity, 106 participants with different foot and ankle musculoskeletal pathologies completed the FAAM-AR and SF-36. In addition, the FAAM-AR internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intra-class correlation coefficient ICC<sub>2,1</sub>.ResultsThe FAAM-AR was moderately correlated with Physical component Summary of SF-36 (ADL r = 0.67; Sport r = 0.67). Whereas, FAAM-AR showed weak correlations with Mental component Summary of SF-36 (ADL r = 0.33; Sport r = 0.19). The FAAM-AR showed excellent degree of internal consistency (ADL = 0.95; Sport = 0.92), and excellent test-retest reliability (ADL = 0.95; Sport = 0.95).ConclusionThe FAAM-AR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing ankle-foot functional status among Arabic-speaking patients with various ankle or foot musculoskeletal pathologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127251339166"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the arabic version of the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM-AR).\",\"authors\":\"Nezar A Althagafi, Abdullah Alqarni, Majed Albadi, Rawan Aldhabi, Umar Alabasi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127251339166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThis study aimed to cross-cultural translate the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure to Arabic version (FAAM-AR) and to assess the psychometric properties of the FAAM-AR in a sample of Arabic-speaking participants.MethodologyThe FAAM-AR was translated according to the International Society for Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) guidelines. To determine construct validity, 106 participants with different foot and ankle musculoskeletal pathologies completed the FAAM-AR and SF-36. In addition, the FAAM-AR internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intra-class correlation coefficient ICC<sub>2,1</sub>.ResultsThe FAAM-AR was moderately correlated with Physical component Summary of SF-36 (ADL r = 0.67; Sport r = 0.67). Whereas, FAAM-AR showed weak correlations with Mental component Summary of SF-36 (ADL r = 0.33; Sport r = 0.19). The FAAM-AR showed excellent degree of internal consistency (ADL = 0.95; Sport = 0.92), and excellent test-retest reliability (ADL = 0.95; Sport = 0.95).ConclusionThe FAAM-AR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing ankle-foot functional status among Arabic-speaking patients with various ankle or foot musculoskeletal pathologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10538127251339166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251339166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251339166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the arabic version of the foot and ankle ability measure (FAAM-AR).
BackgroundThis study aimed to cross-cultural translate the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure to Arabic version (FAAM-AR) and to assess the psychometric properties of the FAAM-AR in a sample of Arabic-speaking participants.MethodologyThe FAAM-AR was translated according to the International Society for Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) guidelines. To determine construct validity, 106 participants with different foot and ankle musculoskeletal pathologies completed the FAAM-AR and SF-36. In addition, the FAAM-AR internal consistency was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Test-retest reliability was assessed using Intra-class correlation coefficient ICC2,1.ResultsThe FAAM-AR was moderately correlated with Physical component Summary of SF-36 (ADL r = 0.67; Sport r = 0.67). Whereas, FAAM-AR showed weak correlations with Mental component Summary of SF-36 (ADL r = 0.33; Sport r = 0.19). The FAAM-AR showed excellent degree of internal consistency (ADL = 0.95; Sport = 0.92), and excellent test-retest reliability (ADL = 0.95; Sport = 0.95).ConclusionThe FAAM-AR is a valid and reliable tool for assessing ankle-foot functional status among Arabic-speaking patients with various ankle or foot musculoskeletal pathologies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.