Kinjal S Majumdar, Thaduri Abhinav, Achyuth Panuganti, Rajkumar K Seenivasagam, Manu Malhotra
{"title":"口腔癌的选择性颈部清扫是否可以根据浸润深度来计划?回顾性分析。","authors":"Kinjal S Majumdar, Thaduri Abhinav, Achyuth Panuganti, Rajkumar K Seenivasagam, Manu Malhotra","doi":"10.1200/GO-24-00451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The literature suggests that elective neck dissection (END) may be avoided in primaries with a depth of invasion (DOI) <3 mm. This study evaluated the accuracy of DOI in predicting nodal metastases (lymph node metastasis [LNM]) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective institutional chart review, pathologic N classification (pN) was correlated with DOI using Spearman's rank-order (pN1-3) and point-biserial (pN0 <i>v</i> pN+) correlation statistics. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was analyzed to determine the accuracy of DOI in predicting LNM. Chi-square statistics were used to measure the association between the DOI groups and pN status (pN0; pN+). Post hoc analysis of variance with Bonferroni statistics was used to compare the three DOI groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DOI failed to demonstrate a strong positive correlation with the pN classification (ρ = 0.31; <i>P</i> < .001). DOI was not strongly correlated with pN status (<i>r</i><sub>pb</sub> = 0.27; <i>P</i> < .001). ROC curve analysis suggested a poor accuracy of DOI in predicting nodal metastases (AUC = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.73]). A statistically significant difference in LNM (pN+) was found between the DOI >10 mm and DOI ≤10 mm primaries (<i>P</i> < .001 for DOI ≤5 mm; <i>P</i> = .016 for DOI >5 mm and ≤10 mm). However, the sensitivity and specificity achieved by ROC analysis for a DOI cutoff value of 10 mm in the present cohort were 69.3% and 57.9%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOI is a poor indicator of LNM in OSCC. The decision to perform END should not be based on the tumor DOI.</p>","PeriodicalId":14806,"journal":{"name":"JCO Global Oncology","volume":"11 ","pages":"e2400451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Elective Neck Dissection for Oral Cancer Be Planned on the Basis of Depth of Invasion? Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kinjal S Majumdar, Thaduri Abhinav, Achyuth Panuganti, Rajkumar K Seenivasagam, Manu Malhotra\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/GO-24-00451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The literature suggests that elective neck dissection (END) may be avoided in primaries with a depth of invasion (DOI) <3 mm. This study evaluated the accuracy of DOI in predicting nodal metastases (lymph node metastasis [LNM]) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective institutional chart review, pathologic N classification (pN) was correlated with DOI using Spearman's rank-order (pN1-3) and point-biserial (pN0 <i>v</i> pN+) correlation statistics. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was analyzed to determine the accuracy of DOI in predicting LNM. Chi-square statistics were used to measure the association between the DOI groups and pN status (pN0; pN+). Post hoc analysis of variance with Bonferroni statistics was used to compare the three DOI groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DOI failed to demonstrate a strong positive correlation with the pN classification (ρ = 0.31; <i>P</i> < .001). DOI was not strongly correlated with pN status (<i>r</i><sub>pb</sub> = 0.27; <i>P</i> < .001). ROC curve analysis suggested a poor accuracy of DOI in predicting nodal metastases (AUC = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.73]). A statistically significant difference in LNM (pN+) was found between the DOI >10 mm and DOI ≤10 mm primaries (<i>P</i> < .001 for DOI ≤5 mm; <i>P</i> = .016 for DOI >5 mm and ≤10 mm). However, the sensitivity and specificity achieved by ROC analysis for a DOI cutoff value of 10 mm in the present cohort were 69.3% and 57.9%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOI is a poor indicator of LNM in OSCC. The decision to perform END should not be based on the tumor DOI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e2400451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO Global Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Global Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/GO-24-00451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Can Elective Neck Dissection for Oral Cancer Be Planned on the Basis of Depth of Invasion? Retrospective Analysis.
Purpose: The literature suggests that elective neck dissection (END) may be avoided in primaries with a depth of invasion (DOI) <3 mm. This study evaluated the accuracy of DOI in predicting nodal metastases (lymph node metastasis [LNM]) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
Materials and methods: In this retrospective institutional chart review, pathologic N classification (pN) was correlated with DOI using Spearman's rank-order (pN1-3) and point-biserial (pN0 v pN+) correlation statistics. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was analyzed to determine the accuracy of DOI in predicting LNM. Chi-square statistics were used to measure the association between the DOI groups and pN status (pN0; pN+). Post hoc analysis of variance with Bonferroni statistics was used to compare the three DOI groups.
Results: DOI failed to demonstrate a strong positive correlation with the pN classification (ρ = 0.31; P < .001). DOI was not strongly correlated with pN status (rpb = 0.27; P < .001). ROC curve analysis suggested a poor accuracy of DOI in predicting nodal metastases (AUC = 0.67 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.73]). A statistically significant difference in LNM (pN+) was found between the DOI >10 mm and DOI ≤10 mm primaries (P < .001 for DOI ≤5 mm; P = .016 for DOI >5 mm and ≤10 mm). However, the sensitivity and specificity achieved by ROC analysis for a DOI cutoff value of 10 mm in the present cohort were 69.3% and 57.9%, respectively.
Conclusion: DOI is a poor indicator of LNM in OSCC. The decision to perform END should not be based on the tumor DOI.