放射科的工作场所公平:芬兰放射学会的一项全国性调查。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Suvi Marjasuo, Milja Holstila, Jussi Hirvonen
{"title":"放射科的工作场所公平:芬兰放射学会的一项全国性调查。","authors":"Suvi Marjasuo, Milja Holstila, Jussi Hirvonen","doi":"10.1186/s13244-025-01975-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The issue of equity among medical professionals has been extensively discussed in recent literature. Gender inequity, in particular, is a well-documented phenomenon within scientific communities. The Radiological Society of Finland undertook a national survey to assess equity among radiologists in Finland, with the primary hypothesis of equity prevailing in the radiological community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study in the form of an online questionnaire was developed to investigate occupational equity and demographic variables. This survey was disseminated to the heads of radiological departments in all Finnish public healthcare units and the largest radiological units within the private sector, with instructions to distribute to their medical staff. The questionnaire was accessible for responses from May 1 to June 16, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 259 answers were received, representing 31% of all radiologists and residents working in Finland. Among the respondents, 137/259 (52.9%) identified as female, 118/259 (45.6%) male, and 1/259 (0.4%) other, with three choosing not to answer. A significant proportion, 63/259 (24.3%), reported having witnessed discriminatory behavior, while 41/259 (15.8%) had personally experienced discrimination. The prevalence of respondents having witnessed workplace discrimination was notably higher in female respondents (42/131, 32.1%) than in males (18/113, 15.9%) or others (0%) (p = 0.012). The most cited bases for discrimination included gender, opinion, age, and cultural background.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perceived discrimination is prevalent within the Finnish radiological community. Gender was reported as the most common suspected grounds of perceived discriminatory behavior.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>This study is the first to explore equity and diversity among radiologists in Finland. This broader approach offers a more comprehensive perspective, and the findings aim to support efforts toward greater inclusivity and equity within the field.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>One-quarter of radiologists in Finland reported witnessing and one-sixth reported personally experiencing discrimination in the workplace. Gender was suspected to be the most common basis for discrimination, followed by differences in opinion, age, and cultural background. Respondents were largely unaware of whether the reported incidents had been addressed. Increasing transparency and communication may help reduce perceived discrimination.</p>","PeriodicalId":13639,"journal":{"name":"Insights into Imaging","volume":"16 1","pages":"106"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace equity in radiology: a nationwide survey by the Radiological Society of Finland.\",\"authors\":\"Suvi Marjasuo, Milja Holstila, Jussi Hirvonen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13244-025-01975-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The issue of equity among medical professionals has been extensively discussed in recent literature. Gender inequity, in particular, is a well-documented phenomenon within scientific communities. The Radiological Society of Finland undertook a national survey to assess equity among radiologists in Finland, with the primary hypothesis of equity prevailing in the radiological community.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study in the form of an online questionnaire was developed to investigate occupational equity and demographic variables. This survey was disseminated to the heads of radiological departments in all Finnish public healthcare units and the largest radiological units within the private sector, with instructions to distribute to their medical staff. The questionnaire was accessible for responses from May 1 to June 16, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 259 answers were received, representing 31% of all radiologists and residents working in Finland. Among the respondents, 137/259 (52.9%) identified as female, 118/259 (45.6%) male, and 1/259 (0.4%) other, with three choosing not to answer. A significant proportion, 63/259 (24.3%), reported having witnessed discriminatory behavior, while 41/259 (15.8%) had personally experienced discrimination. The prevalence of respondents having witnessed workplace discrimination was notably higher in female respondents (42/131, 32.1%) than in males (18/113, 15.9%) or others (0%) (p = 0.012). The most cited bases for discrimination included gender, opinion, age, and cultural background.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Perceived discrimination is prevalent within the Finnish radiological community. Gender was reported as the most common suspected grounds of perceived discriminatory behavior.</p><p><strong>Critical relevance statement: </strong>This study is the first to explore equity and diversity among radiologists in Finland. This broader approach offers a more comprehensive perspective, and the findings aim to support efforts toward greater inclusivity and equity within the field.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>One-quarter of radiologists in Finland reported witnessing and one-sixth reported personally experiencing discrimination in the workplace. Gender was suspected to be the most common basis for discrimination, followed by differences in opinion, age, and cultural background. Respondents were largely unaware of whether the reported incidents had been addressed. Increasing transparency and communication may help reduce perceived discrimination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12081815/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Insights into Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-01975-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insights into Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-01975-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在最近的文献中,医疗专业人员之间的公平问题得到了广泛的讨论。性别不平等尤其在科学界是一个有据可查的现象。芬兰放射学会进行了一项全国调查,以评估芬兰放射科医生的公平性,主要假设是放射界普遍存在公平性。方法:以在线问卷的形式进行横断面研究,以调查职业公平和人口统计学变量。这项调查已分发给芬兰所有公共保健单位和私营部门最大的放射单位的放射科主管,并指示分发给其医务人员。该问卷于2024年5月1日至6月16日期间开放。结果:共收到259份答案,占在芬兰工作的所有放射科医生和住院医生的31%。在受访者中,女性占137/259(52.9%),男性占118/259(45.6%),其他占1/259(0.4%),其中3人选择不回答。很大一部分,63/259(24.3%)报告目睹了歧视行为,而41/259(15.8%)亲身经历过歧视。女性受访者目睹职场歧视的比例(42/131,32.1%)明显高于男性受访者(18/113,15.9%)或其他受访者(0%)(p = 0.012)。被引用最多的歧视理由包括性别、观点、年龄和文化背景。结论:芬兰放射界普遍存在明显的歧视。据报告,性别是最常见的涉嫌歧视行为的理由。关键相关性声明:本研究首次探索芬兰放射科医师的公平性和多样性。这种更广泛的方法提供了更全面的视角,研究结果旨在支持在该领域内实现更大的包容性和公平性的努力。重点:芬兰四分之一的放射科医生报告目睹了工作场所的歧视,六分之一的人报告亲身经历过歧视。性别被认为是最常见的歧视基础,其次是观点、年龄和文化背景的差异。受访者基本上不知道所报告的事件是否得到了解决。增加透明度和沟通可能有助于减少感知到的歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workplace equity in radiology: a nationwide survey by the Radiological Society of Finland.

Objectives: The issue of equity among medical professionals has been extensively discussed in recent literature. Gender inequity, in particular, is a well-documented phenomenon within scientific communities. The Radiological Society of Finland undertook a national survey to assess equity among radiologists in Finland, with the primary hypothesis of equity prevailing in the radiological community.

Methods: A cross-sectional study in the form of an online questionnaire was developed to investigate occupational equity and demographic variables. This survey was disseminated to the heads of radiological departments in all Finnish public healthcare units and the largest radiological units within the private sector, with instructions to distribute to their medical staff. The questionnaire was accessible for responses from May 1 to June 16, 2024.

Results: A total of 259 answers were received, representing 31% of all radiologists and residents working in Finland. Among the respondents, 137/259 (52.9%) identified as female, 118/259 (45.6%) male, and 1/259 (0.4%) other, with three choosing not to answer. A significant proportion, 63/259 (24.3%), reported having witnessed discriminatory behavior, while 41/259 (15.8%) had personally experienced discrimination. The prevalence of respondents having witnessed workplace discrimination was notably higher in female respondents (42/131, 32.1%) than in males (18/113, 15.9%) or others (0%) (p = 0.012). The most cited bases for discrimination included gender, opinion, age, and cultural background.

Conclusions: Perceived discrimination is prevalent within the Finnish radiological community. Gender was reported as the most common suspected grounds of perceived discriminatory behavior.

Critical relevance statement: This study is the first to explore equity and diversity among radiologists in Finland. This broader approach offers a more comprehensive perspective, and the findings aim to support efforts toward greater inclusivity and equity within the field.

Key points: One-quarter of radiologists in Finland reported witnessing and one-sixth reported personally experiencing discrimination in the workplace. Gender was suspected to be the most common basis for discrimination, followed by differences in opinion, age, and cultural background. Respondents were largely unaware of whether the reported incidents had been addressed. Increasing transparency and communication may help reduce perceived discrimination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Insights into Imaging
Insights into Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
182
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Insights into Imaging (I³) is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. All content published in the journal is freely available online to anyone, anywhere! I³ continuously updates scientific knowledge and progress in best-practice standards in radiology through the publication of original articles and state-of-the-art reviews and opinions, along with recommendations and statements from the leading radiological societies in Europe. Founded by the European Society of Radiology (ESR), I³ creates a platform for educational material, guidelines and recommendations, and a forum for topics of controversy. A balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes I³ an indispensable source for current information in this field. I³ is owned by the ESR, however authors retain copyright to their article according to the Creative Commons Attribution License (see Copyright and License Agreement). All articles can be read, redistributed and reused for free, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. The open access fees (article-processing charges) for this journal are kindly sponsored by ESR for all Members. The journal went open access in 2012, which means that all articles published since then are freely available online.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信