Adriënne Rotteveel, Saskia Knies, Ardine de Wit, Johan Polder, Bram Wouterse
{"title":"重视预防:荷兰专家委员会的经验教训和建议。","authors":"Adriënne Rotteveel, Saskia Knies, Ardine de Wit, Johan Polder, Bram Wouterse","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2025.2504946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Countries have been struggling with investments in prevention. How to obtain insight in the costs, benefits, and budgetary impacts of investments in prevention? And how to weigh investments in prevention against other investments in health, such as in curative health care. In the Netherlands, in 2023, a methodological expert committee was established to answer such questions. Their advice, published in January 2024, has been impactful, receiving much attention in Dutch politics and policy and leading to the establishment of a subsequent scientific committee on appropriate evidence and the development of an investment model for prevention.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this perspective, we present the main recommendations from the advice and embed these recommendations in the Dutch institutional context. Furthermore, we highlight why the financing of prevention is challenging and suggest some solutions. Finally, we discuss how the advice was received and what follow-up was given, reflect on why this advice had such a large impact, and distill recommendations for other countries from this experience.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Economic evaluation of prevention is not intrinsically more challenging than that of other health investments. For a direct comparison of investments in health, similar methods should be used for both prevention and medical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":" ","pages":"849-854"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valuing prevention: lessons and recommendations from a Dutch expert committee.\",\"authors\":\"Adriënne Rotteveel, Saskia Knies, Ardine de Wit, Johan Polder, Bram Wouterse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737167.2025.2504946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Countries have been struggling with investments in prevention. How to obtain insight in the costs, benefits, and budgetary impacts of investments in prevention? And how to weigh investments in prevention against other investments in health, such as in curative health care. In the Netherlands, in 2023, a methodological expert committee was established to answer such questions. Their advice, published in January 2024, has been impactful, receiving much attention in Dutch politics and policy and leading to the establishment of a subsequent scientific committee on appropriate evidence and the development of an investment model for prevention.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this perspective, we present the main recommendations from the advice and embed these recommendations in the Dutch institutional context. Furthermore, we highlight why the financing of prevention is challenging and suggest some solutions. Finally, we discuss how the advice was received and what follow-up was given, reflect on why this advice had such a large impact, and distill recommendations for other countries from this experience.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Economic evaluation of prevention is not intrinsically more challenging than that of other health investments. For a direct comparison of investments in health, similar methods should be used for both prevention and medical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"849-854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2504946\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2025.2504946","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Valuing prevention: lessons and recommendations from a Dutch expert committee.
Introduction: Countries have been struggling with investments in prevention. How to obtain insight in the costs, benefits, and budgetary impacts of investments in prevention? And how to weigh investments in prevention against other investments in health, such as in curative health care. In the Netherlands, in 2023, a methodological expert committee was established to answer such questions. Their advice, published in January 2024, has been impactful, receiving much attention in Dutch politics and policy and leading to the establishment of a subsequent scientific committee on appropriate evidence and the development of an investment model for prevention.
Areas covered: In this perspective, we present the main recommendations from the advice and embed these recommendations in the Dutch institutional context. Furthermore, we highlight why the financing of prevention is challenging and suggest some solutions. Finally, we discuss how the advice was received and what follow-up was given, reflect on why this advice had such a large impact, and distill recommendations for other countries from this experience.
Expert opinion: Economic evaluation of prevention is not intrinsically more challenging than that of other health investments. For a direct comparison of investments in health, similar methods should be used for both prevention and medical care.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review.
The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections:
Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.