Cameron E Alexander, Hannah Warren, Alexander Light, Ridhi Agarwal, Aqua Asif, Bing Jie Chow, Keiran Clement, Vinson Chan, Eleanor Zimmermann, Sinan Khadhouri, Pieter Jan Eyskens, Taimur T Shah, Arjun Nathan, Kevin Byrnes, Nikita Bhatt, Nick Mani, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Paul S Sidhu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Veeru Kasivisvanathan
{"title":"超声诊断睾丸扭转:诊断准确性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Cameron E Alexander, Hannah Warren, Alexander Light, Ridhi Agarwal, Aqua Asif, Bing Jie Chow, Keiran Clement, Vinson Chan, Eleanor Zimmermann, Sinan Khadhouri, Pieter Jan Eyskens, Taimur T Shah, Arjun Nathan, Kevin Byrnes, Nikita Bhatt, Nick Mani, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Paul S Sidhu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Veeru Kasivisvanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Uncertainty regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for testicular torsion (TT) and a lack of high-level evidence to inform international guidelines have led to significant global variation in its use. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for TT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was applied up to January 4, 2024. Colour Doppler sonography (CDS) was the primary index test, with surgical scrotal exploration or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate models.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria; 54 (85.7%) assessed CDS, and the others assessed spectral doppler sonography (n = 6), contrast enhanced ultrasound (n = 1), or an alternative combination of ultrasound technologies (n = 2). The summary sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) and specificity (95% CI) of CDS for the diagnosis of TT were 95.3% (91.4-97.5) and 98.3% (96.2-99.3), respectively (42 studies, 4422 participants). Patient selection (related to the risk of bias and applicability concern) was identified as the domain of the greatest methodological concern on QUADAS-2 assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CDS has high diagnostic accuracy for TT. The ideal patient pathway for suspected TT should integrate timely access to ultrasound alongside clinical assessment, with careful patient counselling.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Testicular Torsion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron E Alexander, Hannah Warren, Alexander Light, Ridhi Agarwal, Aqua Asif, Bing Jie Chow, Keiran Clement, Vinson Chan, Eleanor Zimmermann, Sinan Khadhouri, Pieter Jan Eyskens, Taimur T Shah, Arjun Nathan, Kevin Byrnes, Nikita Bhatt, Nick Mani, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Paul S Sidhu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Veeru Kasivisvanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Uncertainty regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for testicular torsion (TT) and a lack of high-level evidence to inform international guidelines have led to significant global variation in its use. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for TT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was applied up to January 4, 2024. Colour Doppler sonography (CDS) was the primary index test, with surgical scrotal exploration or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate models.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria; 54 (85.7%) assessed CDS, and the others assessed spectral doppler sonography (n = 6), contrast enhanced ultrasound (n = 1), or an alternative combination of ultrasound technologies (n = 2). The summary sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) and specificity (95% CI) of CDS for the diagnosis of TT were 95.3% (91.4-97.5) and 98.3% (96.2-99.3), respectively (42 studies, 4422 participants). Patient selection (related to the risk of bias and applicability concern) was identified as the domain of the greatest methodological concern on QUADAS-2 assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CDS has high diagnostic accuracy for TT. The ideal patient pathway for suspected TT should integrate timely access to ultrasound alongside clinical assessment, with careful patient counselling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Testicular Torsion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.
Background and objective: Uncertainty regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for testicular torsion (TT) and a lack of high-level evidence to inform international guidelines have led to significant global variation in its use. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for TT.
Methods: This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was applied up to January 4, 2024. Colour Doppler sonography (CDS) was the primary index test, with surgical scrotal exploration or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate models.
Key findings and limitations: Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria; 54 (85.7%) assessed CDS, and the others assessed spectral doppler sonography (n = 6), contrast enhanced ultrasound (n = 1), or an alternative combination of ultrasound technologies (n = 2). The summary sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) and specificity (95% CI) of CDS for the diagnosis of TT were 95.3% (91.4-97.5) and 98.3% (96.2-99.3), respectively (42 studies, 4422 participants). Patient selection (related to the risk of bias and applicability concern) was identified as the domain of the greatest methodological concern on QUADAS-2 assessment.
Conclusions and clinical implications: CDS has high diagnostic accuracy for TT. The ideal patient pathway for suspected TT should integrate timely access to ultrasound alongside clinical assessment, with careful patient counselling.
期刊介绍:
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.