超声诊断睾丸扭转:诊断准确性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Cameron E Alexander, Hannah Warren, Alexander Light, Ridhi Agarwal, Aqua Asif, Bing Jie Chow, Keiran Clement, Vinson Chan, Eleanor Zimmermann, Sinan Khadhouri, Pieter Jan Eyskens, Taimur T Shah, Arjun Nathan, Kevin Byrnes, Nikita Bhatt, Nick Mani, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Paul S Sidhu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Veeru Kasivisvanathan
{"title":"超声诊断睾丸扭转:诊断准确性的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Cameron E Alexander, Hannah Warren, Alexander Light, Ridhi Agarwal, Aqua Asif, Bing Jie Chow, Keiran Clement, Vinson Chan, Eleanor Zimmermann, Sinan Khadhouri, Pieter Jan Eyskens, Taimur T Shah, Arjun Nathan, Kevin Byrnes, Nikita Bhatt, Nick Mani, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Paul S Sidhu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Veeru Kasivisvanathan","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Uncertainty regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for testicular torsion (TT) and a lack of high-level evidence to inform international guidelines have led to significant global variation in its use. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for TT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was applied up to January 4, 2024. Colour Doppler sonography (CDS) was the primary index test, with surgical scrotal exploration or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate models.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria; 54 (85.7%) assessed CDS, and the others assessed spectral doppler sonography (n = 6), contrast enhanced ultrasound (n = 1), or an alternative combination of ultrasound technologies (n = 2). The summary sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) and specificity (95% CI) of CDS for the diagnosis of TT were 95.3% (91.4-97.5) and 98.3% (96.2-99.3), respectively (42 studies, 4422 participants). Patient selection (related to the risk of bias and applicability concern) was identified as the domain of the greatest methodological concern on QUADAS-2 assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CDS has high diagnostic accuracy for TT. The ideal patient pathway for suspected TT should integrate timely access to ultrasound alongside clinical assessment, with careful patient counselling.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Testicular Torsion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Cameron E Alexander, Hannah Warren, Alexander Light, Ridhi Agarwal, Aqua Asif, Bing Jie Chow, Keiran Clement, Vinson Chan, Eleanor Zimmermann, Sinan Khadhouri, Pieter Jan Eyskens, Taimur T Shah, Arjun Nathan, Kevin Byrnes, Nikita Bhatt, Nick Mani, Cathy Yuhong Yuan, Paul S Sidhu, Yemisi Takwoingi, Veeru Kasivisvanathan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Uncertainty regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for testicular torsion (TT) and a lack of high-level evidence to inform international guidelines have led to significant global variation in its use. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for TT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was applied up to January 4, 2024. Colour Doppler sonography (CDS) was the primary index test, with surgical scrotal exploration or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate models.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria; 54 (85.7%) assessed CDS, and the others assessed spectral doppler sonography (n = 6), contrast enhanced ultrasound (n = 1), or an alternative combination of ultrasound technologies (n = 2). The summary sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) and specificity (95% CI) of CDS for the diagnosis of TT were 95.3% (91.4-97.5) and 98.3% (96.2-99.3), respectively (42 studies, 4422 participants). Patient selection (related to the risk of bias and applicability concern) was identified as the domain of the greatest methodological concern on QUADAS-2 assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CDS has high diagnostic accuracy for TT. The ideal patient pathway for suspected TT should integrate timely access to ultrasound alongside clinical assessment, with careful patient counselling.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology focus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.026\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.04.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:关于超声诊断睾丸扭转(TT)准确性的不确定性,以及缺乏高水平证据来告知国际指南,导致其使用在全球范围内存在重大差异。本研究的目的是评估超声诊断TT的准确性。方法:本系统评价按照Cochrane诊断测试准确性系统评价手册进行。截止到2024年1月4日,还实施了全面的电子搜索战略。以彩色多普勒超声(CDS)为主要指标,以手术阴囊探查或临床随访为参考标准。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估-2 (QUADAS-2)工具评估偏倚风险和适用性。采用双变量模型进行meta分析。主要发现和局限性:63项研究符合纳入标准;54例(85.7%)评估了CDS,其余评估了频谱多普勒超声(n = 6)、对比增强超声(n = 1)或超声技术的替代组合(n = 2)。CDS诊断TT的总敏感性(95%置信区间[CI])和特异性(95% CI)分别为95.3%(91.4 ~ 97.5)和98.3%(96.2 ~ 99.3)(42项研究,4422名受试者)。患者选择(与偏倚风险和适用性问题相关)被确定为QUADAS-2评估中最值得关注的方法学领域。结论及临床意义:CDS对TT有较高的诊断准确性。疑似TT的理想患者途径应该包括及时获得超声检查和临床评估,以及仔细的患者咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Testicular Torsion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.

Background and objective: Uncertainty regarding the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for testicular torsion (TT) and a lack of high-level evidence to inform international guidelines have led to significant global variation in its use. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for TT.

Methods: This systematic review was undertaken in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy. A comprehensive electronic search strategy was applied up to January 4, 2024. Colour Doppler sonography (CDS) was the primary index test, with surgical scrotal exploration or clinical follow-up as the reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. Meta-analyses were performed using bivariate models.

Key findings and limitations: Sixty-three studies met the inclusion criteria; 54 (85.7%) assessed CDS, and the others assessed spectral doppler sonography (n = 6), contrast enhanced ultrasound (n = 1), or an alternative combination of ultrasound technologies (n = 2). The summary sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI]) and specificity (95% CI) of CDS for the diagnosis of TT were 95.3% (91.4-97.5) and 98.3% (96.2-99.3), respectively (42 studies, 4422 participants). Patient selection (related to the risk of bias and applicability concern) was identified as the domain of the greatest methodological concern on QUADAS-2 assessment.

Conclusions and clinical implications: CDS has high diagnostic accuracy for TT. The ideal patient pathway for suspected TT should integrate timely access to ultrasound alongside clinical assessment, with careful patient counselling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信