肺动脉高压临床试验中患者报告的结局指标的选择:系统回顾、荟萃分析和健康相关生活质量框架

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2025-05-14 Print Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0006-2025
Frances Varian, Rebecca Burney, Charlotte Pearson, Ze Ming Goh, Joseph Newman, Gregg Rawlings, Hamza Zafar, David G Kiely, A A Roger Thompson, Robin Condliffe, Mark Toshner, Ciara McCormack, Iain Armstrong, Tessa Peasgood, Jill Carlton, Alexander M K Rothman
{"title":"肺动脉高压临床试验中患者报告的结局指标的选择:系统回顾、荟萃分析和健康相关生活质量框架","authors":"Frances Varian, Rebecca Burney, Charlotte Pearson, Ze Ming Goh, Joseph Newman, Gregg Rawlings, Hamza Zafar, David G Kiely, A A Roger Thompson, Robin Condliffe, Mark Toshner, Ciara McCormack, Iain Armstrong, Tessa Peasgood, Jill Carlton, Alexander M K Rothman","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0006-2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is valued as an outcome measure by patients, clinicians and regulators. The selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measurement of HRQoL in PAH clinical trials lacks systematic evaluation of their suitability, accuracy and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024484021) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of PROMs selected in PAH clinical trials. PROM measurement properties were then evaluated according to the 10-step COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and graded by recommendation for use. Finally, HRQoL was modelled into a conceptual framework using patient interviews and surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screening of 896 records identified 90 randomised controlled trials. 43 trials selected PROMs, of which 20 were sufficiently validated to detect meaningful change. Of these, eight trials were adequately powered, using either EuroQol-five dimensions-five levels (EQ-5D-5L), Short-Form-36 (SF-36) or the Living with Pulmonary Hypertension Questionnaire (LPHQ). The COSMIN evaluation recommended EmPHasis-10 and the LPHQ for use (grade A); whereas, SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L require further study (grade B). A conceptual framework of HRQoL was developed from literature comprising 8045 patients. This framework can be used to visualise the different HRQoL concepts measured by different PROMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To improve patient-centred research, greater consistency in PROM selection is required. Three of 90 randomised controlled trials have selected COSMIN-recommended PROMs. Whilst the PROMs evaluated require development across the 10 areas of psychometric property measurement, EmPHasis-10 and the LPHQ can be recommended for use. The ratified conceptual framework can further support PROM selection by identifying the HRQoL concepts they are likely to capture.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":"34 176","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of patient-reported outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials: a systematic review, meta-analysis and health-related quality of life framework.\",\"authors\":\"Frances Varian, Rebecca Burney, Charlotte Pearson, Ze Ming Goh, Joseph Newman, Gregg Rawlings, Hamza Zafar, David G Kiely, A A Roger Thompson, Robin Condliffe, Mark Toshner, Ciara McCormack, Iain Armstrong, Tessa Peasgood, Jill Carlton, Alexander M K Rothman\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/16000617.0006-2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is valued as an outcome measure by patients, clinicians and regulators. The selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measurement of HRQoL in PAH clinical trials lacks systematic evaluation of their suitability, accuracy and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We report a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024484021) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of PROMs selected in PAH clinical trials. PROM measurement properties were then evaluated according to the 10-step COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and graded by recommendation for use. Finally, HRQoL was modelled into a conceptual framework using patient interviews and surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Screening of 896 records identified 90 randomised controlled trials. 43 trials selected PROMs, of which 20 were sufficiently validated to detect meaningful change. Of these, eight trials were adequately powered, using either EuroQol-five dimensions-five levels (EQ-5D-5L), Short-Form-36 (SF-36) or the Living with Pulmonary Hypertension Questionnaire (LPHQ). The COSMIN evaluation recommended EmPHasis-10 and the LPHQ for use (grade A); whereas, SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L require further study (grade B). A conceptual framework of HRQoL was developed from literature comprising 8045 patients. This framework can be used to visualise the different HRQoL concepts measured by different PROMs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To improve patient-centred research, greater consistency in PROM selection is required. Three of 90 randomised controlled trials have selected COSMIN-recommended PROMs. Whilst the PROMs evaluated require development across the 10 areas of psychometric property measurement, EmPHasis-10 and the LPHQ can be recommended for use. The ratified conceptual framework can further support PROM selection by identifying the HRQoL concepts they are likely to capture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"volume\":\"34 176\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076161/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0006-2025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0006-2025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肺动脉高压(PAH)患者健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)被患者、临床医生和监管机构视为一种衡量结果。在PAH临床试验中,选择患者报告的结局指标(PROMs)来测量HRQoL缺乏对其适用性、准确性和可靠性的系统评估。方法:我们报告了一项系统综述(PROSPERO ID: CRD42024484021),该综述遵循了在PAH临床试验中选择的PROMs的系统综述和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南。然后根据基于共识的10步健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单对PROM测量特性进行评估,并根据使用建议进行分级。最后,利用患者访谈和调查将HRQoL建模为概念框架。结果:筛选了896份记录,确定了90项随机对照试验。43个试验选择了PROMs,其中20个试验被充分验证以检测有意义的变化。其中,使用euroqol五维度五水平(EQ-5D-5L)、SF-36短表(SF-36)或肺动脉高压生活问卷(LPHQ)的8项试验获得了足够的支持。COSMIN评价建议使用EmPHasis-10和LPHQ (A级);而SF-36和EQ-5D-5L则需要进一步研究(B级)。从8045例患者的文献中发展出HRQoL的概念框架。该框架可用于可视化由不同prom测量的不同HRQoL概念。结论:为了改善以患者为中心的研究,需要在PROM选择上有更大的一致性。90个随机对照试验中有3个选择了cosmin推荐的PROMs。虽然评估的prom需要在心理测量属性测量的10个领域进行开发,但可以推荐使用EmPHasis-10和LPHQ。经过批准的概念框架可以通过识别它们可能捕获的HRQoL概念来进一步支持PROM选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Selection of patient-reported outcome measures in pulmonary arterial hypertension clinical trials: a systematic review, meta-analysis and health-related quality of life framework.

Introduction: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is valued as an outcome measure by patients, clinicians and regulators. The selection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measurement of HRQoL in PAH clinical trials lacks systematic evaluation of their suitability, accuracy and reliability.

Methods: We report a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024484021) following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines of PROMs selected in PAH clinical trials. PROM measurement properties were then evaluated according to the 10-step COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and graded by recommendation for use. Finally, HRQoL was modelled into a conceptual framework using patient interviews and surveys.

Results: Screening of 896 records identified 90 randomised controlled trials. 43 trials selected PROMs, of which 20 were sufficiently validated to detect meaningful change. Of these, eight trials were adequately powered, using either EuroQol-five dimensions-five levels (EQ-5D-5L), Short-Form-36 (SF-36) or the Living with Pulmonary Hypertension Questionnaire (LPHQ). The COSMIN evaluation recommended EmPHasis-10 and the LPHQ for use (grade A); whereas, SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L require further study (grade B). A conceptual framework of HRQoL was developed from literature comprising 8045 patients. This framework can be used to visualise the different HRQoL concepts measured by different PROMs.

Conclusion: To improve patient-centred research, greater consistency in PROM selection is required. Three of 90 randomised controlled trials have selected COSMIN-recommended PROMs. Whilst the PROMs evaluated require development across the 10 areas of psychometric property measurement, EmPHasis-10 and the LPHQ can be recommended for use. The ratified conceptual framework can further support PROM selection by identifying the HRQoL concepts they are likely to capture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信