Ana Vaz Ferreira, Matthieu Delaye, Arnaud Pages, Antoine Hollebecque, Anas Gazzah, Rastio Bahleda, Jean-Marie Michot, Francois-Xavier Danlos, Lauren Seknazi, Vincent Goldschmidt, Clémence Hénon, Madonna Sakkal, Cristina Smolenschi, Stéphane Champiat, Aurelien Marabelle, Yohann Loriot, Céline Nagera Lazarovici, Zoé Ap-Thomas, Geoffroy Beraud Chaullet, Santiago Ponce Aix, Christophe Massard, Kaissa Ouali, Maxime Frelaut, Capucine Baldini
{"title":"年龄不影响抗体药物偶联物的疗效,但与早期临床试验中癌症患者的高度不良事件相关。","authors":"Ana Vaz Ferreira, Matthieu Delaye, Arnaud Pages, Antoine Hollebecque, Anas Gazzah, Rastio Bahleda, Jean-Marie Michot, Francois-Xavier Danlos, Lauren Seknazi, Vincent Goldschmidt, Clémence Hénon, Madonna Sakkal, Cristina Smolenschi, Stéphane Champiat, Aurelien Marabelle, Yohann Loriot, Céline Nagera Lazarovici, Zoé Ap-Thomas, Geoffroy Beraud Chaullet, Santiago Ponce Aix, Christophe Massard, Kaissa Ouali, Maxime Frelaut, Capucine Baldini","doi":"10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age Does not Affect the Efficacy of Antibody Drug Conjugates, But is Associated with High-Grade Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Enrolled in Early Phase Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Vaz Ferreira, Matthieu Delaye, Arnaud Pages, Antoine Hollebecque, Anas Gazzah, Rastio Bahleda, Jean-Marie Michot, Francois-Xavier Danlos, Lauren Seknazi, Vincent Goldschmidt, Clémence Hénon, Madonna Sakkal, Cristina Smolenschi, Stéphane Champiat, Aurelien Marabelle, Yohann Loriot, Céline Nagera Lazarovici, Zoé Ap-Thomas, Geoffroy Beraud Chaullet, Santiago Ponce Aix, Christophe Massard, Kaissa Ouali, Maxime Frelaut, Capucine Baldini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>All patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-025-01212-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于抗体药物偶联物(adc)在老年患者中的应用的数据很少。目的:目的是研究adc用于≥65岁患者早期临床试验的安全性和有效性,并与年轻患者进行比较。患者和方法:2014年11月至2023年5月在我院参加adc治疗实体瘤早期临床试验(I期或II期)的所有患者纳入本回顾性单中心研究。比较≥65岁和< 65岁患者的安全性和有效性。结果:我们的研究共纳入136例患者,其中43例(31.6%)患者年龄≥65岁。与年轻人群相比,65岁及以上的患者具有相似的人口统计学特征。老年患者的所有级别不良事件发生率(95.3比97.8%)和所有级别相关不良事件发生率(65.1比66.7%)相同,但高级不良事件发生率(41.9比30.1%)高于年轻患者。在单因素分析中,我们确定年龄作为一个连续变量,与严重不良事件相关(p = 0.047)。老年和年轻患者在疾病控制率(65比54%)、中位无进展生存期(2.76个月[95%置信区间,95% CI 1.64-3.75]比2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34)或中位总生存期(6.57个月[95% CI 4.01-13.01]比7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65)方面无统计学差异。结论:在我们的队列中,ADC治疗为老年患者提供了相当的生存益处,但有更高的严重不良事件风险。
Age Does not Affect the Efficacy of Antibody Drug Conjugates, But is Associated with High-Grade Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer Enrolled in Early Phase Clinical Trials.
Background: Data on the use of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) in older patients are scarce.
Objective: The objective was to study the safety and efficacy of ADCs used in early phase clinical trials in patients aged ≥ 65 years compared with younger patients.
Patients and methods: All patients enrolled in early phase clinical trials (phase I or II) of ADCs for solid tumors in our institution between November 2014 and May 2023 were included in this retrospective monocentric study. Safety and efficacy were compared between patients ≥ 65 and < 65 years old (y.o).
Results: A total of 136 patients were included in our study, with 43 (31.6%) patients aged ≥ 65 y.o. In comparison with the younger population, patients aged 65 years or older had similar demographic characteristics. Older patients experienced the same rate of all-grade adverse events (95.3 versus 97.8%) and all-grade related adverse events (65.1 versus 66.7%) but more high-grade adverse events (41.9 versus 30.1%) than younger patients. In the univariate analysis, we identified age, taken as a continuous variable, as associated with high-grade adverse event (p = 0.047). No statistically significant difference was found between older and younger patients in terms of disease control rate (65 versus 54%), median progression-free survival (2.76 months [95% confidence interval, 95% CI 1.64-3.75] compared with 2.56 [95% CI 1.81-2.79], p = 0.34), or median overall survival (6.57 months [95% CI 4.01-13.01] compared to 7.89 [95% CI 6.83-9.36], p = 0.65).
Conclusions: In our cohort, ADC therapy provided comparable survival benefits for the older patients but with a higher risk of high-grade adverse event.
期刊介绍:
Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly.
The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.