预先随机化癫痫发作计数设计的时间充分评估了perampanel治疗局灶性癫痫发作的安全性和耐受性。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI:10.1111/epi.18460
Wesley T Kerr, Leock Y Ngo, Liang Zhu, Anna Patten, Jocelyn Y Cheng, Lavanya Biju, Jacqueline A French
{"title":"预先随机化癫痫发作计数设计的时间充分评估了perampanel治疗局灶性癫痫发作的安全性和耐受性。","authors":"Wesley T Kerr, Leock Y Ngo, Liang Zhu, Anna Patten, Jocelyn Y Cheng, Lavanya Biju, Jacqueline A French","doi":"10.1111/epi.18460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In traditionally designed randomized clinical trials of antiseizure medications, participants take a blinded treatment for a prespecified number of weeks, irrespective of continued seizures. The alternative design time to prerandomization monthly seizure count (T-PSC) allows participants to end the blinded treatment after an individually prespecified number of seizures, which shortens exposure to placebo and ineffective treatment. Previous reanalyses have shown that T-PSC replicated the efficacy conclusions of trials; therefore, we evaluated whether T-PSC also could replicate tolerability and safety conclusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively applied the T-PSC design to analyze treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from three blinded, placebo-controlled trials of perampanel for focal onset seizures (NCT00699972, NCT00699582, NCT00700310). We evaluated the incidences of TEAEs, treatment-related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs that prompted medication adjustment compared to those observed during the full-length trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1480 participants in the three trials, 1093 experienced any TEAE, of whom 1006 (92%) had onset prior to T-PSC. When evaluating the differences in each type of TEAE for each dose of perampanel from placebo within each trial, there was no consistent pattern of under- or overestimation. Across the three studies, 23 of 79 (29%) serious TEAEs, most requiring hospitalization, occurred after T-PSC.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Almost all TEAEs occurred before T-PSC. Similar conclusions regarding the tolerability and safety of perampanel would have been reached if the T-PSC design had been used. This suggests that the T-PSC design may potentially benefit participants by allowing earlier change from an ineffective treatment to an alternate treatment, which could reduce the risk of serious consequences of ineffective treatment, such as hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to prerandomization seizure count design sufficiently assessed the safety and tolerability of perampanel for the treatment of focal seizures.\",\"authors\":\"Wesley T Kerr, Leock Y Ngo, Liang Zhu, Anna Patten, Jocelyn Y Cheng, Lavanya Biju, Jacqueline A French\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In traditionally designed randomized clinical trials of antiseizure medications, participants take a blinded treatment for a prespecified number of weeks, irrespective of continued seizures. The alternative design time to prerandomization monthly seizure count (T-PSC) allows participants to end the blinded treatment after an individually prespecified number of seizures, which shortens exposure to placebo and ineffective treatment. Previous reanalyses have shown that T-PSC replicated the efficacy conclusions of trials; therefore, we evaluated whether T-PSC also could replicate tolerability and safety conclusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively applied the T-PSC design to analyze treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from three blinded, placebo-controlled trials of perampanel for focal onset seizures (NCT00699972, NCT00699582, NCT00700310). We evaluated the incidences of TEAEs, treatment-related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs that prompted medication adjustment compared to those observed during the full-length trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1480 participants in the three trials, 1093 experienced any TEAE, of whom 1006 (92%) had onset prior to T-PSC. When evaluating the differences in each type of TEAE for each dose of perampanel from placebo within each trial, there was no consistent pattern of under- or overestimation. Across the three studies, 23 of 79 (29%) serious TEAEs, most requiring hospitalization, occurred after T-PSC.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Almost all TEAEs occurred before T-PSC. Similar conclusions regarding the tolerability and safety of perampanel would have been reached if the T-PSC design had been used. This suggests that the T-PSC design may potentially benefit participants by allowing earlier change from an ineffective treatment to an alternate treatment, which could reduce the risk of serious consequences of ineffective treatment, such as hospitalization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18460\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在传统设计的抗癫痫药物随机临床试验中,参与者在预先指定的数周内接受盲法治疗,而不考虑是否持续发作。随机化前每月癫痫发作次数(T-PSC)的替代设计时间允许参与者在单独预先指定的癫痫发作次数后结束盲法治疗,这缩短了安慰剂和无效治疗的暴露时间。先前的重新分析表明,T-PSC重复了试验的疗效结论;因此,我们评估了T-PSC是否也能重复耐受性和安全性结论。方法:回顾性应用T-PSC设计分析perampanel治疗局灶性癫痫发作(NCT00699972, NCT00699582, NCT00700310)的三个盲法安慰剂对照试验的治疗不良事件(teae)。我们评估了teae、治疗相关teae、严重teae和促使药物调整的teae的发生率,并与全长试验期间观察到的teae进行了比较。结果:在三项试验的1480名参与者中,1093人经历过TEAE,其中1006人(92%)在T-PSC之前发病。当评估每项试验中每剂量perampanel与安慰剂的每种类型TEAE的差异时,没有一致的低估或高估模式。在三项研究中,79例严重teae中有23例(29%)发生在T-PSC后,大多数需要住院治疗。意义:几乎所有teae都发生在T-PSC之前。如果采用T-PSC设计,关于玻璃面板的耐受性和安全性也会得出类似的结论。这表明,T-PSC设计可能会使参与者受益,因为它允许从无效治疗早期转变为替代治疗,这可能会降低无效治疗的严重后果的风险,例如住院治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time to prerandomization seizure count design sufficiently assessed the safety and tolerability of perampanel for the treatment of focal seizures.

Objective: In traditionally designed randomized clinical trials of antiseizure medications, participants take a blinded treatment for a prespecified number of weeks, irrespective of continued seizures. The alternative design time to prerandomization monthly seizure count (T-PSC) allows participants to end the blinded treatment after an individually prespecified number of seizures, which shortens exposure to placebo and ineffective treatment. Previous reanalyses have shown that T-PSC replicated the efficacy conclusions of trials; therefore, we evaluated whether T-PSC also could replicate tolerability and safety conclusions.

Methods: We retrospectively applied the T-PSC design to analyze treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) from three blinded, placebo-controlled trials of perampanel for focal onset seizures (NCT00699972, NCT00699582, NCT00700310). We evaluated the incidences of TEAEs, treatment-related TEAEs, serious TEAEs, and TEAEs that prompted medication adjustment compared to those observed during the full-length trial.

Results: Of the 1480 participants in the three trials, 1093 experienced any TEAE, of whom 1006 (92%) had onset prior to T-PSC. When evaluating the differences in each type of TEAE for each dose of perampanel from placebo within each trial, there was no consistent pattern of under- or overestimation. Across the three studies, 23 of 79 (29%) serious TEAEs, most requiring hospitalization, occurred after T-PSC.

Significance: Almost all TEAEs occurred before T-PSC. Similar conclusions regarding the tolerability and safety of perampanel would have been reached if the T-PSC design had been used. This suggests that the T-PSC design may potentially benefit participants by allowing earlier change from an ineffective treatment to an alternate treatment, which could reduce the risk of serious consequences of ineffective treatment, such as hospitalization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信