Mammen Abijithgeorge, Selvaraj Samuelkamaleshkumar, Suresh Annpatriciacatherine, Ranjan Aruna, Joel Ronaldthomvicmaradona, Maya P Ganesan
{"title":"Vellore疼痛影响问卷(V-PIQ):初步验证了基于简短ICF核心集评估腰痛影响的工具。","authors":"Mammen Abijithgeorge, Selvaraj Samuelkamaleshkumar, Suresh Annpatriciacatherine, Ranjan Aruna, Joel Ronaldthomvicmaradona, Maya P Ganesan","doi":"10.1177/02692155251337570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo develop and validate the Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire to assess the impact of low back pain in the Indian context.DesignA cross-sectional, quantitative study with two phases: development and validation of the Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire. Content validity was ensured through a Delphi process involving five occupational therapists, while reliability and criterion validity were assessed.SettingThe study was conducted at the Occupational Therapy outpatient unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India.ParticipantsSixty-five patients aged 18 years and above with nonspecific low back pain persisting for at least 12 weeks were recruited through convenience sampling.InterventionNot applicable.Main MeasuresThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire underwent inter-rater and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Criterion validity was evaluated against the Oswestry disability index.ResultsThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire showed excellent content validity (content validity index: 0.96). It demonstrated high reliability, with inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.985) and test-retest (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.973) scores. The receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated moderate criterion validity (area under the curve: 0.628) compared to the Oswestry disability index. The questionnaire's broader coverage of ICF categories, including psychological and environmental factors, highlights its ability to capture the multidimensional impact of low back pain.ConclusionsThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire shows promise as a reliable and culturally relevant tool for assessing low back pain impact in India, addressing physical, psychological, and social factors. However, further studies are necessary to establish its validity across diverse populations and settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10441,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"2692155251337570"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire (V-PIQ): Initial validation of a tool for assessing the impact of low back pain based on the brief ICF core set.\",\"authors\":\"Mammen Abijithgeorge, Selvaraj Samuelkamaleshkumar, Suresh Annpatriciacatherine, Ranjan Aruna, Joel Ronaldthomvicmaradona, Maya P Ganesan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692155251337570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo develop and validate the Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire to assess the impact of low back pain in the Indian context.DesignA cross-sectional, quantitative study with two phases: development and validation of the Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire. Content validity was ensured through a Delphi process involving five occupational therapists, while reliability and criterion validity were assessed.SettingThe study was conducted at the Occupational Therapy outpatient unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India.ParticipantsSixty-five patients aged 18 years and above with nonspecific low back pain persisting for at least 12 weeks were recruited through convenience sampling.InterventionNot applicable.Main MeasuresThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire underwent inter-rater and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Criterion validity was evaluated against the Oswestry disability index.ResultsThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire showed excellent content validity (content validity index: 0.96). It demonstrated high reliability, with inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.985) and test-retest (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.973) scores. The receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated moderate criterion validity (area under the curve: 0.628) compared to the Oswestry disability index. The questionnaire's broader coverage of ICF categories, including psychological and environmental factors, highlights its ability to capture the multidimensional impact of low back pain.ConclusionsThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire shows promise as a reliable and culturally relevant tool for assessing low back pain impact in India, addressing physical, psychological, and social factors. However, further studies are necessary to establish its validity across diverse populations and settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2692155251337570\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251337570\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251337570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire (V-PIQ): Initial validation of a tool for assessing the impact of low back pain based on the brief ICF core set.
ObjectiveTo develop and validate the Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire to assess the impact of low back pain in the Indian context.DesignA cross-sectional, quantitative study with two phases: development and validation of the Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire. Content validity was ensured through a Delphi process involving five occupational therapists, while reliability and criterion validity were assessed.SettingThe study was conducted at the Occupational Therapy outpatient unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India.ParticipantsSixty-five patients aged 18 years and above with nonspecific low back pain persisting for at least 12 weeks were recruited through convenience sampling.InterventionNot applicable.Main MeasuresThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire underwent inter-rater and test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Criterion validity was evaluated against the Oswestry disability index.ResultsThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire showed excellent content validity (content validity index: 0.96). It demonstrated high reliability, with inter-rater (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.985) and test-retest (intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.973) scores. The receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated moderate criterion validity (area under the curve: 0.628) compared to the Oswestry disability index. The questionnaire's broader coverage of ICF categories, including psychological and environmental factors, highlights its ability to capture the multidimensional impact of low back pain.ConclusionsThe Vellore Pain Impact Questionnaire shows promise as a reliable and culturally relevant tool for assessing low back pain impact in India, addressing physical, psychological, and social factors. However, further studies are necessary to establish its validity across diverse populations and settings.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Rehabilitation covering the whole field of disability and rehabilitation, this peer-reviewed journal publishes research and discussion articles and acts as a forum for the international dissemination and exchange of information amongst the large number of professionals involved in rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)