Victoria Jahrreiss, Vineet Gauhar, Olivier Traxer, Khi Yung Fong, Saeed Bin Hamri, Karl Tan, Vigen Malkhasyan, Satyendra Persaud, Mohamed Elshazly, Wissam Kamal, Steffi Yuen, Vikram Sridharan, Daniele Castellani, Mehmet Ilker Gökce, Nariman Gadzhiev, Deepak Ragoori, Boyke Soebhali, Chu Ann Chai, Azimdjon N Tursunkulov, Yiloren Tanidir, Tzevat Tefik, Anil Shrestha, Marek Zawadzki, Mohamed Amine Lakmichi, Christian Seitz, Bhaskar K Somani
{"title":"预支架植入对柔性和可导航吸力(FANS)通路鞘结果的影响。一项多中心前瞻性研究的结果,由泌尿外科的EAU部门和全球fan合作小组。","authors":"Victoria Jahrreiss, Vineet Gauhar, Olivier Traxer, Khi Yung Fong, Saeed Bin Hamri, Karl Tan, Vigen Malkhasyan, Satyendra Persaud, Mohamed Elshazly, Wissam Kamal, Steffi Yuen, Vikram Sridharan, Daniele Castellani, Mehmet Ilker Gökce, Nariman Gadzhiev, Deepak Ragoori, Boyke Soebhali, Chu Ann Chai, Azimdjon N Tursunkulov, Yiloren Tanidir, Tzevat Tefik, Anil Shrestha, Marek Zawadzki, Mohamed Amine Lakmichi, Christian Seitz, Bhaskar K Somani","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pre-stenting remains a subject of debate, and its influence on FANS assisted ureteroscopy is unclear. The global FANS collaborative group aims to address the influence of pre-stenting on FANS-assisted ureterorenoscopy (URS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective multicentre study assesses the outcomes of 394 patients undergoing FANS-assisted ureteroscopy for renal stones. Patients were stratified into a non-pre-stented (group 1, n = 163) and pre-stented group (group 2, n = 231). Data on demographics, stone characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative 30-day outcomes were analysed. Statistical analyses, including multivariate regression, were performed for stone-free rates (SFR) and complications. SFR was defined by bone window on non-contrast computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-stented patients had a higher prevalence of positive urine culture treated with preoperative antibiotics (23.8% vs 12.3%, p = 0.006). Larger stone volumes were noted (1,306 mm<sup>3</sup> vs 1,200 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.027) in group 1. Postoperative complications were minor. Sepsis was not reported in either group. Group 1 had a higher incidence of low-grade Traxer grade 1 ureteric injuries (4.3% vs 0.4%, p = 0.021). FANS resulted in high overall SFRs of 97.5% and 97.0% in groups 1 and group 2. Multivariate analysis showed no statistical difference in SFR between the groups (63.2% vs 53.2%, p = 0.063). Only thulium fibre laser (TFL) and stone volume were significant predictors of residual fragments (RF).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-stenting for FANS is not mandatory irrespective of stone location and volume. The use of TFL and stone volume significantly influenced SFR, while FANS itself proved highly effective in achieving high SFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 1","pages":"85-93"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12073519/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of pre-stenting on flexible and navigable suction (FANS) access sheath outcomes. Results of a prospective multicentre study by the EAU Section of Endourology and the global FANS collaborative group.\",\"authors\":\"Victoria Jahrreiss, Vineet Gauhar, Olivier Traxer, Khi Yung Fong, Saeed Bin Hamri, Karl Tan, Vigen Malkhasyan, Satyendra Persaud, Mohamed Elshazly, Wissam Kamal, Steffi Yuen, Vikram Sridharan, Daniele Castellani, Mehmet Ilker Gökce, Nariman Gadzhiev, Deepak Ragoori, Boyke Soebhali, Chu Ann Chai, Azimdjon N Tursunkulov, Yiloren Tanidir, Tzevat Tefik, Anil Shrestha, Marek Zawadzki, Mohamed Amine Lakmichi, Christian Seitz, Bhaskar K Somani\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2024.0197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pre-stenting remains a subject of debate, and its influence on FANS assisted ureteroscopy is unclear. The global FANS collaborative group aims to address the influence of pre-stenting on FANS-assisted ureterorenoscopy (URS).</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This prospective multicentre study assesses the outcomes of 394 patients undergoing FANS-assisted ureteroscopy for renal stones. Patients were stratified into a non-pre-stented (group 1, n = 163) and pre-stented group (group 2, n = 231). Data on demographics, stone characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative 30-day outcomes were analysed. Statistical analyses, including multivariate regression, were performed for stone-free rates (SFR) and complications. SFR was defined by bone window on non-contrast computed tomography (CT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-stented patients had a higher prevalence of positive urine culture treated with preoperative antibiotics (23.8% vs 12.3%, p = 0.006). Larger stone volumes were noted (1,306 mm<sup>3</sup> vs 1,200 mm<sup>3</sup>, p = 0.027) in group 1. Postoperative complications were minor. Sepsis was not reported in either group. Group 1 had a higher incidence of low-grade Traxer grade 1 ureteric injuries (4.3% vs 0.4%, p = 0.021). FANS resulted in high overall SFRs of 97.5% and 97.0% in groups 1 and group 2. Multivariate analysis showed no statistical difference in SFR between the groups (63.2% vs 53.2%, p = 0.063). Only thulium fibre laser (TFL) and stone volume were significant predictors of residual fragments (RF).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pre-stenting for FANS is not mandatory irrespective of stone location and volume. The use of TFL and stone volume significantly influenced SFR, while FANS itself proved highly effective in achieving high SFR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"85-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12073519/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:预支架置入术仍然是一个有争议的话题,其对FANS辅助输尿管镜的影响尚不清楚。全球FANS合作小组旨在解决预支架植入对FANS辅助输尿管镜检查(URS)的影响。材料和方法:这项前瞻性多中心研究评估了394例接受fans辅助输尿管镜治疗肾结石的患者的结果。患者被分为未支架植入组(1组,n = 163)和支架植入组(2组,n = 231)。对人口统计学、结石特征、手术参数和术后30天预后数据进行分析。统计分析,包括多变量回归,进行无结石率(SFR)和并发症。通过非对比计算机断层扫描(CT)的骨窗来定义SFR。结果:支架置入术前接受抗生素治疗的患者尿培养阳性率较高(23.8% vs 12.3%, p = 0.006)。第1组的结石体积较大(1,306 mm3 vs 1,200 mm3, p = 0.027)。术后并发症轻微。两组均未出现脓毒症。组1低级别Traxer 1级输尿管损伤发生率较高(4.3% vs 0.4%, p = 0.021)。在第1组和第2组中,FANS导致的总SFRs较高,分别为97.5%和97.0%。多因素分析显示,两组间SFR无统计学差异(63.2% vs 53.2%, p = 0.063)。只有铥纤维激光(TFL)和结石体积是残留碎片(RF)的显著预测因子。结论:无论结石的位置和体积如何,FANS的预支架置入不是强制性的。TFL和石头体积的使用显著影响SFR,而FANS本身被证明在实现高SFR方面非常有效。
Influence of pre-stenting on flexible and navigable suction (FANS) access sheath outcomes. Results of a prospective multicentre study by the EAU Section of Endourology and the global FANS collaborative group.
Introduction: Pre-stenting remains a subject of debate, and its influence on FANS assisted ureteroscopy is unclear. The global FANS collaborative group aims to address the influence of pre-stenting on FANS-assisted ureterorenoscopy (URS).
Material and methods: This prospective multicentre study assesses the outcomes of 394 patients undergoing FANS-assisted ureteroscopy for renal stones. Patients were stratified into a non-pre-stented (group 1, n = 163) and pre-stented group (group 2, n = 231). Data on demographics, stone characteristics, operative parameters, and postoperative 30-day outcomes were analysed. Statistical analyses, including multivariate regression, were performed for stone-free rates (SFR) and complications. SFR was defined by bone window on non-contrast computed tomography (CT).
Results: Pre-stented patients had a higher prevalence of positive urine culture treated with preoperative antibiotics (23.8% vs 12.3%, p = 0.006). Larger stone volumes were noted (1,306 mm3 vs 1,200 mm3, p = 0.027) in group 1. Postoperative complications were minor. Sepsis was not reported in either group. Group 1 had a higher incidence of low-grade Traxer grade 1 ureteric injuries (4.3% vs 0.4%, p = 0.021). FANS resulted in high overall SFRs of 97.5% and 97.0% in groups 1 and group 2. Multivariate analysis showed no statistical difference in SFR between the groups (63.2% vs 53.2%, p = 0.063). Only thulium fibre laser (TFL) and stone volume were significant predictors of residual fragments (RF).
Conclusions: Pre-stenting for FANS is not mandatory irrespective of stone location and volume. The use of TFL and stone volume significantly influenced SFR, while FANS itself proved highly effective in achieving high SFR.