哨兵给药:一种建议的算法,用于指导早期临床药理学试验中哪些队列应该使用这种方法的决策。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jules A A C Heuberger, Perry de Jongh, Ewoud-Jan van Hoogdalem, Wim Tamminga, Pieter de Graeff, Geert Jan Groeneveld
{"title":"哨兵给药:一种建议的算法,用于指导早期临床药理学试验中哪些队列应该使用这种方法的决策。","authors":"Jules A A C Heuberger, Perry de Jongh, Ewoud-Jan van Hoogdalem, Wim Tamminga, Pieter de Graeff, Geert Jan Groeneveld","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this paper is to describe a proposal for an algorithm to guide decision making on which cohorts in early phase pharmacology trials should employ a sentinel approach, thereby standardising and harmonising practices, and improving decision making around sentinel dosing. Sentinel dosing is an approach described in EMA guidelines; however, the guidance does not provide detail on which cohorts or dose levels sentinel dosing applies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This algorithm was designed using the expertise of senior scientific staff from the largest clinical research organisations in the Netherlands and after consultation with members of the ethics committee handling most early phase clinical drug trials in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm describes a decision tree considering different aspects of the design of the trial, the IMP, and the prior knowledge of the IMP based on (pre)clinical data, to be used by investigators and regulators. Hereby the decision-making process on sentinel cohorts will be tailored to the specific IMP and information available. Starting in 2024, all three expert Phase 1 units that co-authored this paper are using the algorithm as guidance for decision-making on the implementation of sentinels in trials that are submitted to the EC Stichting BEBO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The algorithm provides further guidance and specification on when to implement sentinel dosing in early phase clinical trials, thereby creating a standardised and harmonised approach, which will improve the protection of subject safety and trial efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentinel dosing: A proposed algorithm to guide decision making on which cohorts in early phase clinical pharmacology trials should use this approach.\",\"authors\":\"Jules A A C Heuberger, Perry de Jongh, Ewoud-Jan van Hoogdalem, Wim Tamminga, Pieter de Graeff, Geert Jan Groeneveld\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bcp.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this paper is to describe a proposal for an algorithm to guide decision making on which cohorts in early phase pharmacology trials should employ a sentinel approach, thereby standardising and harmonising practices, and improving decision making around sentinel dosing. Sentinel dosing is an approach described in EMA guidelines; however, the guidance does not provide detail on which cohorts or dose levels sentinel dosing applies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This algorithm was designed using the expertise of senior scientific staff from the largest clinical research organisations in the Netherlands and after consultation with members of the ethics committee handling most early phase clinical drug trials in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The algorithm describes a decision tree considering different aspects of the design of the trial, the IMP, and the prior knowledge of the IMP based on (pre)clinical data, to be used by investigators and regulators. Hereby the decision-making process on sentinel cohorts will be tailored to the specific IMP and information available. Starting in 2024, all three expert Phase 1 units that co-authored this paper are using the algorithm as guidance for decision-making on the implementation of sentinels in trials that are submitted to the EC Stichting BEBO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The algorithm provides further guidance and specification on when to implement sentinel dosing in early phase clinical trials, thereby creating a standardised and harmonised approach, which will improve the protection of subject safety and trial efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of clinical pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70090\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70090","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文的目的是描述一种算法的建议,以指导早期药理试验中哪些队列应该采用哨点方法的决策,从而标准化和协调实践,并改善哨点剂量的决策。哨点给药是EMA指南中描述的一种方法;然而,该指南并未详细说明前哨剂量适用于哪些队列或剂量水平。方法:该算法的设计利用了荷兰最大的临床研究组织的高级科学人员的专业知识,并咨询了荷兰处理大多数早期临床药物试验的伦理委员会成员。结果:该算法描述了一个决策树,考虑了试验设计的不同方面,IMP,以及基于(预)临床数据的IMP的先验知识,供研究者和监管机构使用。因此,哨兵队列的决策过程将根据具体的IMP和现有信息进行调整。从2024年开始,共同撰写本文的所有三个第一阶段专家单位都将使用该算法作为提交给EC Stichting BEBO的试验中实施哨兵的决策指导。结论:该算法为在早期临床试验中何时实施哨点给药提供了进一步的指导和规范,从而创建了一种标准化和协调的方法,将提高对受试者安全性的保护和试验效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sentinel dosing: A proposed algorithm to guide decision making on which cohorts in early phase clinical pharmacology trials should use this approach.

Aim: The aim of this paper is to describe a proposal for an algorithm to guide decision making on which cohorts in early phase pharmacology trials should employ a sentinel approach, thereby standardising and harmonising practices, and improving decision making around sentinel dosing. Sentinel dosing is an approach described in EMA guidelines; however, the guidance does not provide detail on which cohorts or dose levels sentinel dosing applies.

Methods: This algorithm was designed using the expertise of senior scientific staff from the largest clinical research organisations in the Netherlands and after consultation with members of the ethics committee handling most early phase clinical drug trials in the Netherlands.

Results: The algorithm describes a decision tree considering different aspects of the design of the trial, the IMP, and the prior knowledge of the IMP based on (pre)clinical data, to be used by investigators and regulators. Hereby the decision-making process on sentinel cohorts will be tailored to the specific IMP and information available. Starting in 2024, all three expert Phase 1 units that co-authored this paper are using the algorithm as guidance for decision-making on the implementation of sentinels in trials that are submitted to the EC Stichting BEBO.

Conclusion: The algorithm provides further guidance and specification on when to implement sentinel dosing in early phase clinical trials, thereby creating a standardised and harmonised approach, which will improve the protection of subject safety and trial efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信