哥伦比亚保留和轻度降低射血分数的心力衰竭的流行病学和短期结果:哥伦比亚心力衰竭登记处(RECOLFACA)的见解。

IF 1.4 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.14740/cr2015
Lisbeth N Morales-Rodriguez, Alex Rivera-Toquica, Clara Saldarriaga, Rolando Palacio, Luis M Avila-Barros, Silfredo Arrieta-Gonzalez, Alfonso Munoz-Velasquez, Eduardo J Echeverry-Navarrete, Julian R Lugo-Pena, Juan A Ceron, Luis E Silva-Diazgranados, Hugo E Osorio-Carmona, Luis E Echeverria, Juan E Gomez-Mesa
{"title":"哥伦比亚保留和轻度降低射血分数的心力衰竭的流行病学和短期结果:哥伦比亚心力衰竭登记处(RECOLFACA)的见解。","authors":"Lisbeth N Morales-Rodriguez, Alex Rivera-Toquica, Clara Saldarriaga, Rolando Palacio, Luis M Avila-Barros, Silfredo Arrieta-Gonzalez, Alfonso Munoz-Velasquez, Eduardo J Echeverry-Navarrete, Julian R Lugo-Pena, Juan A Ceron, Luis E Silva-Diazgranados, Hugo E Osorio-Carmona, Luis E Echeverria, Juan E Gomez-Mesa","doi":"10.14740/cr2015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmrEF) has differences in therapy and development when compared with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and all-cause mortality of patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF compared to those with HFrEF from the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RECOLFACA included Colombian adult patients with ambulatory HF recruited from 2017 to 2019. All-cause mortality was our main outcome. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, life table, and Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the role of the comorbidities on mortality, with a significant P-value of < 0.05. All statistical tests were two-tailed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2,514 patients, and 1,139 (45.3%) had a diagnosis of HFpEF or HFmrEF. HFpEF/HFmrEF diagnosis was not significantly related to either higher or lower risk of mortality compared to an HFrEF diagnosis; however, the individual risk factors for this outcome varied between the two groups. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was a common risk factor for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the EF classification was not a significant risk factor for mortality, patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF exhibited a unique profile of risk factors for mortality, the HRQL, highlighting the relevance of an adequate classification of the HF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9424,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research","volume":"16 3","pages":"267-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074688/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology and Short-Term Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction in Colombia: Insights of the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).\",\"authors\":\"Lisbeth N Morales-Rodriguez, Alex Rivera-Toquica, Clara Saldarriaga, Rolando Palacio, Luis M Avila-Barros, Silfredo Arrieta-Gonzalez, Alfonso Munoz-Velasquez, Eduardo J Echeverry-Navarrete, Julian R Lugo-Pena, Juan A Ceron, Luis E Silva-Diazgranados, Hugo E Osorio-Carmona, Luis E Echeverria, Juan E Gomez-Mesa\",\"doi\":\"10.14740/cr2015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmrEF) has differences in therapy and development when compared with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and all-cause mortality of patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF compared to those with HFrEF from the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RECOLFACA included Colombian adult patients with ambulatory HF recruited from 2017 to 2019. All-cause mortality was our main outcome. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, life table, and Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the role of the comorbidities on mortality, with a significant P-value of < 0.05. All statistical tests were two-tailed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2,514 patients, and 1,139 (45.3%) had a diagnosis of HFpEF or HFmrEF. HFpEF/HFmrEF diagnosis was not significantly related to either higher or lower risk of mortality compared to an HFrEF diagnosis; however, the individual risk factors for this outcome varied between the two groups. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was a common risk factor for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the EF classification was not a significant risk factor for mortality, patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF exhibited a unique profile of risk factors for mortality, the HRQL, highlighting the relevance of an adequate classification of the HF patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cardiology Research\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"267-277\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074688/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cardiology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr2015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/cr2015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)相比,心力衰竭伴射血分数保留或轻度降低(HFpEF/HFmrEF)在治疗和发展方面存在差异。我们的目的是描述HFpEF/HFmrEF患者与来自哥伦比亚心力衰竭登记处(RECOLFACA)的HFrEF患者的临床特征和全因死亡率。方法:RECOLFACA纳入2017年至2019年招募的哥伦比亚成年非流动HF患者。全因死亡率是我们的主要结果。我们采用Kaplan-Meier法、生命表和Cox比例风险模型评估合并症对死亡率的影响,p值均< 0.05。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。结果:我们纳入了2514例患者,其中1139例(45.3%)被诊断为HFpEF或HFmrEF。与HFrEF诊断相比,HFpEF/HFmrEF诊断与更高或更低的死亡风险均无显著相关性;然而,导致这一结果的个体风险因素在两组之间有所不同。与健康相关的生活质量(HRQL)是两组的共同危险因素。结论:尽管心衰分类不是死亡率的重要危险因素,但HFpEF/HFmrEF患者表现出独特的死亡率危险因素HRQL,突出了对心衰患者进行适当分类的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Epidemiology and Short-Term Outcomes of Heart Failure With Preserved and Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction in Colombia: Insights of the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).

Background: Heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF/HFmrEF) has differences in therapy and development when compared with HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and all-cause mortality of patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF compared to those with HFrEF from the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).

Methods: RECOLFACA included Colombian adult patients with ambulatory HF recruited from 2017 to 2019. All-cause mortality was our main outcome. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, life table, and Cox proportional hazard models to evaluate the role of the comorbidities on mortality, with a significant P-value of < 0.05. All statistical tests were two-tailed.

Results: We included 2,514 patients, and 1,139 (45.3%) had a diagnosis of HFpEF or HFmrEF. HFpEF/HFmrEF diagnosis was not significantly related to either higher or lower risk of mortality compared to an HFrEF diagnosis; however, the individual risk factors for this outcome varied between the two groups. Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was a common risk factor for both groups.

Conclusion: Although the EF classification was not a significant risk factor for mortality, patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF exhibited a unique profile of risk factors for mortality, the HRQL, highlighting the relevance of an adequate classification of the HF patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiology Research
Cardiology Research CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research is an open access, peer-reviewed, international journal. All submissions relating to basic research and clinical practice of cardiology and cardiovascular medicine are in this journal''s scope. This journal focuses on publishing original research and observations in all cardiovascular medicine aspects. Manuscript types include original article, review, case report, short communication, book review, letter to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信