关于波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那改组的新立法:向前迈进了一步?

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Dijana Marković-Bajalović
{"title":"关于波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那改组的新立法:向前迈进了一步?","authors":"Dijana Marković-Bajalović","doi":"10.1002/iir.1568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The legislative competence concerning insolvency in Bosnia and Herzegovina (‘BH’) lies with two entities – the Federation of BH and the Republic of Srpska – and the autonomous Brčko District. The reform of insolvency laws started 20 years ago and was influenced by new insolvency legislation in neighbouring countries. In recent years, BH insolvency laws have undergone major changes promoted by the World Bank and inspired by the European Union's activity on introducing measures aiming to prevent insolvency – Commission Recommendation 2014/135 on a new approach to a business failure and insolvency and Directive (EU) 2019/1023 on preventive restructuring and insolvency. The two BH entities and the Brčko District adopted new insolvency laws laying down the court's restructuring procedure. Besides, the Republic of Srpska enacted a special law on out-of-court financial restructuring. A debtor or a creditor can initiate restructuring in court in case of a debtor's imminent inability to pay debts. The restructuring procedure resembles the insolvency process, with the court managing the process within a strict timeline. The opening of the procedure activates the automatic stay of enforcement actions against the debtor. The court appoints a trustee among qualified insolvency administrators to list the debtor's property items and creditors' claims and control the debtor's operations by the end of the process. The role of creditors is minimised. They notify claims to the court and vote on a restructuring plan proposed by a debtor. BH laws fail to outline the scope of restructuring measures; they merely distinguish financial and operational restructuring. BH laws do not classify creditors according to the commonality of interests principle and consequently do not allow cram-down across classes. Measures concerning early warning of creditors on the debtor's imminent inability to pay debts are missing in the laws. Provisions for special treatment of new financing are also lacking. Out-of-court restructuring is possible in BH within the framework of general contract law. Besides, the Republic of Srpska legislator made negotiations on voluntary out-of-court restructuring possible with the assistance of the Chamber of Commerce RS.</p>","PeriodicalId":53971,"journal":{"name":"International Insolvency Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"183-202"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New legislation on restructuring in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A step forward?\",\"authors\":\"Dijana Marković-Bajalović\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/iir.1568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The legislative competence concerning insolvency in Bosnia and Herzegovina (‘BH’) lies with two entities – the Federation of BH and the Republic of Srpska – and the autonomous Brčko District. The reform of insolvency laws started 20 years ago and was influenced by new insolvency legislation in neighbouring countries. In recent years, BH insolvency laws have undergone major changes promoted by the World Bank and inspired by the European Union's activity on introducing measures aiming to prevent insolvency – Commission Recommendation 2014/135 on a new approach to a business failure and insolvency and Directive (EU) 2019/1023 on preventive restructuring and insolvency. The two BH entities and the Brčko District adopted new insolvency laws laying down the court's restructuring procedure. Besides, the Republic of Srpska enacted a special law on out-of-court financial restructuring. A debtor or a creditor can initiate restructuring in court in case of a debtor's imminent inability to pay debts. The restructuring procedure resembles the insolvency process, with the court managing the process within a strict timeline. The opening of the procedure activates the automatic stay of enforcement actions against the debtor. The court appoints a trustee among qualified insolvency administrators to list the debtor's property items and creditors' claims and control the debtor's operations by the end of the process. The role of creditors is minimised. They notify claims to the court and vote on a restructuring plan proposed by a debtor. BH laws fail to outline the scope of restructuring measures; they merely distinguish financial and operational restructuring. BH laws do not classify creditors according to the commonality of interests principle and consequently do not allow cram-down across classes. Measures concerning early warning of creditors on the debtor's imminent inability to pay debts are missing in the laws. Provisions for special treatment of new financing are also lacking. Out-of-court restructuring is possible in BH within the framework of general contract law. Besides, the Republic of Srpska legislator made negotiations on voluntary out-of-court restructuring possible with the assistance of the Chamber of Commerce RS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Insolvency Review\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"183-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Insolvency Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1568\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Insolvency Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那(“波黑”)关于破产的立法权限属于两个实体- -波黑联邦和斯普斯卡共和国- -以及布尔科自治区。破产法的改革始于20年前,受到邻国新的破产法的影响。近年来,在世界银行的推动下,波黑的破产法发生了重大变化,并受到欧盟采取旨在防止破产措施的活动的启发——委员会关于企业倒闭和破产新方法的建议2014/135和关于预防性重组和破产的指令(EU) 2019/1023。波黑的两个实体和布尔科地区通过了新的破产法,规定了法院的重组程序。此外,斯普斯卡共和国颁布了一项关于庭外财政改组的特别法律。在债务人即将无力偿还债务的情况下,债务人或债权人可以向法院提起重组。重组程序类似于破产程序,法院在严格的时间表内管理这一过程。程序的开启激活了对债务人强制执行诉讼的自动中止。法院在合格的破产管理人中任命一名受托人,列出债务人的财产项目和债权人的债权,并在程序结束时控制债务人的经营。债权人的作用被最小化。他们将债权通知法院,并对债务人提出的重组计划进行表决。波黑法律未能概述重组措施的范围;它们仅仅区分了财务重组和业务重组。波黑法律没有根据共同利益原则对债权人进行分类,因此不允许跨阶级的压制。法律缺乏对债务人即将无力偿还债务的债权人进行预警的措施。对新融资给予特殊待遇的规定也缺乏。波黑可以在一般合同法的框架内进行庭外重组。此外,斯普斯卡共和国的立法者在塞族商会的协助下就自愿庭外重组问题进行了谈判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New legislation on restructuring in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A step forward?

The legislative competence concerning insolvency in Bosnia and Herzegovina (‘BH’) lies with two entities – the Federation of BH and the Republic of Srpska – and the autonomous Brčko District. The reform of insolvency laws started 20 years ago and was influenced by new insolvency legislation in neighbouring countries. In recent years, BH insolvency laws have undergone major changes promoted by the World Bank and inspired by the European Union's activity on introducing measures aiming to prevent insolvency – Commission Recommendation 2014/135 on a new approach to a business failure and insolvency and Directive (EU) 2019/1023 on preventive restructuring and insolvency. The two BH entities and the Brčko District adopted new insolvency laws laying down the court's restructuring procedure. Besides, the Republic of Srpska enacted a special law on out-of-court financial restructuring. A debtor or a creditor can initiate restructuring in court in case of a debtor's imminent inability to pay debts. The restructuring procedure resembles the insolvency process, with the court managing the process within a strict timeline. The opening of the procedure activates the automatic stay of enforcement actions against the debtor. The court appoints a trustee among qualified insolvency administrators to list the debtor's property items and creditors' claims and control the debtor's operations by the end of the process. The role of creditors is minimised. They notify claims to the court and vote on a restructuring plan proposed by a debtor. BH laws fail to outline the scope of restructuring measures; they merely distinguish financial and operational restructuring. BH laws do not classify creditors according to the commonality of interests principle and consequently do not allow cram-down across classes. Measures concerning early warning of creditors on the debtor's imminent inability to pay debts are missing in the laws. Provisions for special treatment of new financing are also lacking. Out-of-court restructuring is possible in BH within the framework of general contract law. Besides, the Republic of Srpska legislator made negotiations on voluntary out-of-court restructuring possible with the assistance of the Chamber of Commerce RS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信