跨国破产程序中的仲裁:中国视角

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yingxiang Long, Rebecca Parry
{"title":"跨国破产程序中的仲裁:中国视角","authors":"Yingxiang Long,&nbsp;Rebecca Parry","doi":"10.1002/iir.1564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The approach to recognition and assistance in cross-border insolvency proceedings in China has tended to be restrictive. In contrast, the approach of Chinese courts to foreign arbitrations has been different. Arbitration has been the favoured means of dispute resolution in China's efforts to participate in world trade and the global economy after 1978. Accordingly, the arbitration legal system has advanced relatively quickly in line with international norms set out under the New York Convention. There are good prospects for recognition of foreign arbitral awards in China and arbitration is well integrated with China's domestic insolvency system. In contrast, China's attitude towards foreign insolvencies remains cautious, even in spite of an arrangement with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. We consider how foreign arbitrations might fare in Chinese insolvencies. We also consider whether the openness to international arbitrations can ameliorate any aspects of the presently restrictive approach to cross-border insolvencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":53971,"journal":{"name":"International Insolvency Review","volume":"34 1","pages":"77-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iir.1564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbitration in cross-border insolvency proceedings: The Chinese perspective\",\"authors\":\"Yingxiang Long,&nbsp;Rebecca Parry\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/iir.1564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The approach to recognition and assistance in cross-border insolvency proceedings in China has tended to be restrictive. In contrast, the approach of Chinese courts to foreign arbitrations has been different. Arbitration has been the favoured means of dispute resolution in China's efforts to participate in world trade and the global economy after 1978. Accordingly, the arbitration legal system has advanced relatively quickly in line with international norms set out under the New York Convention. There are good prospects for recognition of foreign arbitral awards in China and arbitration is well integrated with China's domestic insolvency system. In contrast, China's attitude towards foreign insolvencies remains cautious, even in spite of an arrangement with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. We consider how foreign arbitrations might fare in Chinese insolvencies. We also consider whether the openness to international arbitrations can ameliorate any aspects of the presently restrictive approach to cross-border insolvencies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Insolvency Review\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"77-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iir.1564\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Insolvency Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1564\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Insolvency Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1564","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国的跨境破产程序中,承认和协助的方法往往是限制性的。相比之下,中国法院处理外国仲裁的方式有所不同。1978年后,在中国参与世界贸易和全球经济的努力中,仲裁一直是备受青睐的争端解决方式。因此,仲裁法律制度的发展相对较快,符合《纽约公约》所确立的国际规范。中国承认外国仲裁裁决的前景很好,仲裁与中国国内破产制度很好地结合在一起。相比之下,尽管中国与香港特别行政区达成了协议,但中国对外国企业破产的态度仍然谨慎。我们考虑了外国仲裁在中国破产中的表现。我们还考虑对国际仲裁的开放是否可以改善目前对跨境破产的限制性做法的任何方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arbitration in cross-border insolvency proceedings: The Chinese perspective

The approach to recognition and assistance in cross-border insolvency proceedings in China has tended to be restrictive. In contrast, the approach of Chinese courts to foreign arbitrations has been different. Arbitration has been the favoured means of dispute resolution in China's efforts to participate in world trade and the global economy after 1978. Accordingly, the arbitration legal system has advanced relatively quickly in line with international norms set out under the New York Convention. There are good prospects for recognition of foreign arbitral awards in China and arbitration is well integrated with China's domestic insolvency system. In contrast, China's attitude towards foreign insolvencies remains cautious, even in spite of an arrangement with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. We consider how foreign arbitrations might fare in Chinese insolvencies. We also consider whether the openness to international arbitrations can ameliorate any aspects of the presently restrictive approach to cross-border insolvencies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信