Mohammad Ali Khasawneh, Ibrahim Khalil Umar, Ahmad Ali Khasawneh
{"title":"事故严重程度建模的可解释人工智能模型","authors":"Mohammad Ali Khasawneh, Ibrahim Khalil Umar, Ahmad Ali Khasawneh","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01318-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accident severity prediction is a critical challenge in traffic safety management, emergency response, and urban mobility planning. Road accidents remain a leading cause of fatalities worldwide, yet existing accident analysis frameworks often lack predictive accuracy, interpretability, and real-time decision-making capabilities. Traditional statistical models fail to capture complex interactions between vehicle attributes, driver behavior, and environmental factors, limiting their effectiveness in accident severity assessment. This study addresses these gaps by developing an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework for accident severity prediction, leveraging machine learning models (Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to enhance model transparency. The dataset, sourced from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), consists of 7394 recorded crashes and incorporates key predictors such as airbag deployment, control devices, seatbelt usage, and driver demographics. Experimental results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms other models, achieving the highest accuracy (80.8%), recall (80.8%), and F1-score (81.0%), making it the most reliable classifier for distinguishing between severe and non-severe accidents. SHAP analysis reveals that airbag deployment, seatbelt usage, and control devices significantly impact accident severity outcomes, providing valuable insights into policy-driven interventions and traffic management strategies. Despite its effectiveness, the study highlights limitations such as data imbalance, lack of real-time behavioral factors, and exclusion of non-fatal crashes, suggesting deep learning integration, real-time telematics, and hybrid AI models in future research. The proposed framework offers a data-driven approach to accident severity prediction, improving road safety policies, vehicle design enhancements, and emergency response efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 6","pages":"2433 - 2445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable artificial intelligence model for accident severity modeling\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Ali Khasawneh, Ibrahim Khalil Umar, Ahmad Ali Khasawneh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42107-025-01318-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accident severity prediction is a critical challenge in traffic safety management, emergency response, and urban mobility planning. Road accidents remain a leading cause of fatalities worldwide, yet existing accident analysis frameworks often lack predictive accuracy, interpretability, and real-time decision-making capabilities. Traditional statistical models fail to capture complex interactions between vehicle attributes, driver behavior, and environmental factors, limiting their effectiveness in accident severity assessment. This study addresses these gaps by developing an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework for accident severity prediction, leveraging machine learning models (Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to enhance model transparency. The dataset, sourced from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), consists of 7394 recorded crashes and incorporates key predictors such as airbag deployment, control devices, seatbelt usage, and driver demographics. Experimental results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms other models, achieving the highest accuracy (80.8%), recall (80.8%), and F1-score (81.0%), making it the most reliable classifier for distinguishing between severe and non-severe accidents. SHAP analysis reveals that airbag deployment, seatbelt usage, and control devices significantly impact accident severity outcomes, providing valuable insights into policy-driven interventions and traffic management strategies. Despite its effectiveness, the study highlights limitations such as data imbalance, lack of real-time behavioral factors, and exclusion of non-fatal crashes, suggesting deep learning integration, real-time telematics, and hybrid AI models in future research. The proposed framework offers a data-driven approach to accident severity prediction, improving road safety policies, vehicle design enhancements, and emergency response efficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"2433 - 2445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01318-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01318-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Explainable artificial intelligence model for accident severity modeling
Accident severity prediction is a critical challenge in traffic safety management, emergency response, and urban mobility planning. Road accidents remain a leading cause of fatalities worldwide, yet existing accident analysis frameworks often lack predictive accuracy, interpretability, and real-time decision-making capabilities. Traditional statistical models fail to capture complex interactions between vehicle attributes, driver behavior, and environmental factors, limiting their effectiveness in accident severity assessment. This study addresses these gaps by developing an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework for accident severity prediction, leveraging machine learning models (Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to enhance model transparency. The dataset, sourced from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), consists of 7394 recorded crashes and incorporates key predictors such as airbag deployment, control devices, seatbelt usage, and driver demographics. Experimental results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms other models, achieving the highest accuracy (80.8%), recall (80.8%), and F1-score (81.0%), making it the most reliable classifier for distinguishing between severe and non-severe accidents. SHAP analysis reveals that airbag deployment, seatbelt usage, and control devices significantly impact accident severity outcomes, providing valuable insights into policy-driven interventions and traffic management strategies. Despite its effectiveness, the study highlights limitations such as data imbalance, lack of real-time behavioral factors, and exclusion of non-fatal crashes, suggesting deep learning integration, real-time telematics, and hybrid AI models in future research. The proposed framework offers a data-driven approach to accident severity prediction, improving road safety policies, vehicle design enhancements, and emergency response efficiency.
期刊介绍:
The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt. Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate: a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.