事故严重程度建模的可解释人工智能模型

Q2 Engineering
Mohammad Ali Khasawneh, Ibrahim Khalil Umar, Ahmad Ali Khasawneh
{"title":"事故严重程度建模的可解释人工智能模型","authors":"Mohammad Ali Khasawneh,&nbsp;Ibrahim Khalil Umar,&nbsp;Ahmad Ali Khasawneh","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01318-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accident severity prediction is a critical challenge in traffic safety management, emergency response, and urban mobility planning. Road accidents remain a leading cause of fatalities worldwide, yet existing accident analysis frameworks often lack predictive accuracy, interpretability, and real-time decision-making capabilities. Traditional statistical models fail to capture complex interactions between vehicle attributes, driver behavior, and environmental factors, limiting their effectiveness in accident severity assessment. This study addresses these gaps by developing an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework for accident severity prediction, leveraging machine learning models (Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to enhance model transparency. The dataset, sourced from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), consists of 7394 recorded crashes and incorporates key predictors such as airbag deployment, control devices, seatbelt usage, and driver demographics. Experimental results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms other models, achieving the highest accuracy (80.8%), recall (80.8%), and F1-score (81.0%), making it the most reliable classifier for distinguishing between severe and non-severe accidents. SHAP analysis reveals that airbag deployment, seatbelt usage, and control devices significantly impact accident severity outcomes, providing valuable insights into policy-driven interventions and traffic management strategies. Despite its effectiveness, the study highlights limitations such as data imbalance, lack of real-time behavioral factors, and exclusion of non-fatal crashes, suggesting deep learning integration, real-time telematics, and hybrid AI models in future research. The proposed framework offers a data-driven approach to accident severity prediction, improving road safety policies, vehicle design enhancements, and emergency response efficiency.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 6","pages":"2433 - 2445"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable artificial intelligence model for accident severity modeling\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Ali Khasawneh,&nbsp;Ibrahim Khalil Umar,&nbsp;Ahmad Ali Khasawneh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42107-025-01318-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Accident severity prediction is a critical challenge in traffic safety management, emergency response, and urban mobility planning. Road accidents remain a leading cause of fatalities worldwide, yet existing accident analysis frameworks often lack predictive accuracy, interpretability, and real-time decision-making capabilities. Traditional statistical models fail to capture complex interactions between vehicle attributes, driver behavior, and environmental factors, limiting their effectiveness in accident severity assessment. This study addresses these gaps by developing an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework for accident severity prediction, leveraging machine learning models (Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to enhance model transparency. The dataset, sourced from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), consists of 7394 recorded crashes and incorporates key predictors such as airbag deployment, control devices, seatbelt usage, and driver demographics. Experimental results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms other models, achieving the highest accuracy (80.8%), recall (80.8%), and F1-score (81.0%), making it the most reliable classifier for distinguishing between severe and non-severe accidents. SHAP analysis reveals that airbag deployment, seatbelt usage, and control devices significantly impact accident severity outcomes, providing valuable insights into policy-driven interventions and traffic management strategies. Despite its effectiveness, the study highlights limitations such as data imbalance, lack of real-time behavioral factors, and exclusion of non-fatal crashes, suggesting deep learning integration, real-time telematics, and hybrid AI models in future research. The proposed framework offers a data-driven approach to accident severity prediction, improving road safety policies, vehicle design enhancements, and emergency response efficiency.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"2433 - 2445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01318-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01318-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

事故严重程度预测是交通安全管理、应急响应和城市交通规划中的一个关键挑战。道路交通事故仍然是世界范围内死亡的主要原因,但现有的事故分析框架往往缺乏预测准确性、可解释性和实时决策能力。传统的统计模型无法捕捉车辆属性、驾驶员行为和环境因素之间复杂的相互作用,限制了其在事故严重性评估中的有效性。本研究通过开发可解释的人工智能(XAI)框架来解决这些差距,用于事故严重性预测,利用机器学习模型(随机森林、极端梯度增强、支持向量机和Naïve贝叶斯)和SHapley加性解释(SHAP)分析来提高模型透明度。该数据集来自死亡分析报告系统(FARS),由7394起记录的事故组成,并结合了安全气囊部署、控制装置、安全带使用和驾驶员人口统计等关键预测因素。实验结果表明,XGBoost优于其他模型,达到了最高的准确率(80.8%)、召回率(80.8%)和f1分数(81.0%),是区分严重事故和非严重事故最可靠的分类器。SHAP分析显示,安全气囊的部署、安全带的使用和控制设备对事故严重程度的结果有显著影响,为政策驱动的干预措施和交通管理策略提供了有价值的见解。尽管具有有效性,但该研究强调了数据不平衡、缺乏实时行为因素、排除非致命碰撞等局限性,建议在未来的研究中整合深度学习、实时远程信息处理和混合人工智能模型。提出的框架提供了一种数据驱动的方法来预测事故严重程度,改进道路安全政策,增强车辆设计和应急响应效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explainable artificial intelligence model for accident severity modeling

Accident severity prediction is a critical challenge in traffic safety management, emergency response, and urban mobility planning. Road accidents remain a leading cause of fatalities worldwide, yet existing accident analysis frameworks often lack predictive accuracy, interpretability, and real-time decision-making capabilities. Traditional statistical models fail to capture complex interactions between vehicle attributes, driver behavior, and environmental factors, limiting their effectiveness in accident severity assessment. This study addresses these gaps by developing an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework for accident severity prediction, leveraging machine learning models (Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, Support Vector Machine, and Naïve Bayes) and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis to enhance model transparency. The dataset, sourced from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), consists of 7394 recorded crashes and incorporates key predictors such as airbag deployment, control devices, seatbelt usage, and driver demographics. Experimental results demonstrate that XGBoost outperforms other models, achieving the highest accuracy (80.8%), recall (80.8%), and F1-score (81.0%), making it the most reliable classifier for distinguishing between severe and non-severe accidents. SHAP analysis reveals that airbag deployment, seatbelt usage, and control devices significantly impact accident severity outcomes, providing valuable insights into policy-driven interventions and traffic management strategies. Despite its effectiveness, the study highlights limitations such as data imbalance, lack of real-time behavioral factors, and exclusion of non-fatal crashes, suggesting deep learning integration, real-time telematics, and hybrid AI models in future research. The proposed framework offers a data-driven approach to accident severity prediction, improving road safety policies, vehicle design enhancements, and emergency response efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信