环境友好型制氢方法的系统综述:反应器技术的最佳效率和可持续性的比较分析

Aisha Hamid , Raja Razuan Raja Deris , Siti Nur Amira Shaffee , Taufiq Yap Yun Hin , Divine Senanu Ametefe , Mohd Lokman Ibrahim
{"title":"环境友好型制氢方法的系统综述:反应器技术的最佳效率和可持续性的比较分析","authors":"Aisha Hamid ,&nbsp;Raja Razuan Raja Deris ,&nbsp;Siti Nur Amira Shaffee ,&nbsp;Taufiq Yap Yun Hin ,&nbsp;Divine Senanu Ametefe ,&nbsp;Mohd Lokman Ibrahim","doi":"10.1016/j.scca.2025.100088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The transition to a hydrogen-based energy system is increasingly viewed as vital for achieving global sustainability and decarbonization goals. This systematic literature review (SLR) critically examines 37 peer-reviewed studies (2018–Q2 2024) on key hydrogen production methods: biomass gasification, auto-thermal reforming (ATR), photochemical water splitting, water electrolysis, and steam reforming. These technologies, while diverse in operational principles and efficiency, converge on the goal of delivering low-carbon hydrogen. Steam reforming remains the most commercially mature, yet it is constrained by high energy demands and catalyst degradation. Biomass gasification emerges as a renewable option, though hampered by cost and technical complexity. ATR offers improved energy efficiency but requires stringent process control. Photochemical water splitting, though promising in its solar-driven mechanism, is hindered by low conversion efficiency and material limitations. Water electrolysis, especially when powered by renewables, delivers high-purity hydrogen, albeit at elevated operational costs. The findings underscore that no single method can universally meet all economic, environmental, and technological criteria. Instead, context-specific hybridization and integration with renewable sources appear most viable. This review emphasizes the need for continued research in advanced catalysts, cost-effective materials, and scalable system designs. It also calls for cross-sectoral collaboration to tailor hydrogen strategies to local resource conditions and energy demands. By articulating the strengths, limitations, and future directions of current hydrogen production pathways, this study contributes to the evolving discourse on sustainable energy and supports informed decision-making toward a resilient, low-carbon future.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101195,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100088"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic review on environmentally friendly hydrogen production methods: comparative analysis of reactor technologies for optimal efficiency and sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Aisha Hamid ,&nbsp;Raja Razuan Raja Deris ,&nbsp;Siti Nur Amira Shaffee ,&nbsp;Taufiq Yap Yun Hin ,&nbsp;Divine Senanu Ametefe ,&nbsp;Mohd Lokman Ibrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scca.2025.100088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The transition to a hydrogen-based energy system is increasingly viewed as vital for achieving global sustainability and decarbonization goals. This systematic literature review (SLR) critically examines 37 peer-reviewed studies (2018–Q2 2024) on key hydrogen production methods: biomass gasification, auto-thermal reforming (ATR), photochemical water splitting, water electrolysis, and steam reforming. These technologies, while diverse in operational principles and efficiency, converge on the goal of delivering low-carbon hydrogen. Steam reforming remains the most commercially mature, yet it is constrained by high energy demands and catalyst degradation. Biomass gasification emerges as a renewable option, though hampered by cost and technical complexity. ATR offers improved energy efficiency but requires stringent process control. Photochemical water splitting, though promising in its solar-driven mechanism, is hindered by low conversion efficiency and material limitations. Water electrolysis, especially when powered by renewables, delivers high-purity hydrogen, albeit at elevated operational costs. The findings underscore that no single method can universally meet all economic, environmental, and technological criteria. Instead, context-specific hybridization and integration with renewable sources appear most viable. This review emphasizes the need for continued research in advanced catalysts, cost-effective materials, and scalable system designs. It also calls for cross-sectoral collaboration to tailor hydrogen strategies to local resource conditions and energy demands. By articulating the strengths, limitations, and future directions of current hydrogen production pathways, this study contributes to the evolving discourse on sustainable energy and supports informed decision-making toward a resilient, low-carbon future.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100088\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772826925000331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772826925000331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

向氢基能源系统的过渡越来越被视为实现全球可持续性和脱碳目标的关键。本系统文献综述(SLR)严格审查了37项同行评议的研究(2018 - 2024年第二季度),这些研究涉及关键的制氢方法:生物质气化、自动热重整(ATR)、光化学水分解、水电解和蒸汽重整。这些技术虽然在操作原理和效率上各不相同,但都朝着提供低碳氢的目标趋同。蒸汽重整仍然是商业上最成熟的,但它受到高能量需求和催化剂降解的限制。尽管受到成本和技术复杂性的阻碍,生物质气化作为一种可再生能源的选择出现了。ATR提供了更高的能源效率,但需要严格的过程控制。光化学水分解虽然在太阳能驱动机制中很有前途,但由于转换效率低和材料限制而受到阻碍。水电解,尤其是使用可再生能源时,可以提供高纯度的氢气,尽管运营成本较高。研究结果强调,没有一种方法可以普遍满足所有的经济、环境和技术标准。相反,具体情况的杂交和可再生能源的整合似乎是最可行的。这篇综述强调需要继续研究先进的催化剂,具有成本效益的材料和可扩展的系统设计。报告还呼吁开展跨部门合作,根据当地资源条件和能源需求制定氢战略。通过阐明当前制氢途径的优势、局限性和未来方向,本研究有助于不断发展的可持续能源论述,并支持明智的决策,以实现有弹性的低碳未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A systematic review on environmentally friendly hydrogen production methods: comparative analysis of reactor technologies for optimal efficiency and sustainability
The transition to a hydrogen-based energy system is increasingly viewed as vital for achieving global sustainability and decarbonization goals. This systematic literature review (SLR) critically examines 37 peer-reviewed studies (2018–Q2 2024) on key hydrogen production methods: biomass gasification, auto-thermal reforming (ATR), photochemical water splitting, water electrolysis, and steam reforming. These technologies, while diverse in operational principles and efficiency, converge on the goal of delivering low-carbon hydrogen. Steam reforming remains the most commercially mature, yet it is constrained by high energy demands and catalyst degradation. Biomass gasification emerges as a renewable option, though hampered by cost and technical complexity. ATR offers improved energy efficiency but requires stringent process control. Photochemical water splitting, though promising in its solar-driven mechanism, is hindered by low conversion efficiency and material limitations. Water electrolysis, especially when powered by renewables, delivers high-purity hydrogen, albeit at elevated operational costs. The findings underscore that no single method can universally meet all economic, environmental, and technological criteria. Instead, context-specific hybridization and integration with renewable sources appear most viable. This review emphasizes the need for continued research in advanced catalysts, cost-effective materials, and scalable system designs. It also calls for cross-sectoral collaboration to tailor hydrogen strategies to local resource conditions and energy demands. By articulating the strengths, limitations, and future directions of current hydrogen production pathways, this study contributes to the evolving discourse on sustainable energy and supports informed decision-making toward a resilient, low-carbon future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信