Ian N. Best , Leonie Brown , Che Elkin , Laura Finnegan , Cameron J.R. McClelland , Chris J. Johnson
{"title":"野生动物、火灾和林业:了解北美驯鹿栖息地和干扰之间的时空关系","authors":"Ian N. Best , Leonie Brown , Che Elkin , Laura Finnegan , Cameron J.R. McClelland , Chris J. Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Across the boreal forest, timber harvesting and wildfire convert mature forests to early seral stands resulting in habitat loss for specialists like woodland caribou (<em>Rangifer tarandus caribou</em>) and habitat gain for generalists like moose (<em>Alces americanus</em>) and bears (black bears: <em>Ursus americanus</em>, grizzly bears: <em>Ursus arctos</em>). However, there have been few studies on how post-disturbance vegetation communities differ in their value as habitat for these large wildlife species and whether differences vary among disturbance and ecosystem types. We investigated the differential effects of clearcut harvest and wildfire on the habitat of caribou, moose, and bears across the boreal and foothills forests of Alberta, Canada. During 2021 and 2022, we collected tree and understory data from 251 harvested and 264 burned stands (0–40 years post-disturbance), as well as 256 stands with recent caribou use (>40 years post-disturbance). We used generalized linear models to quantify availability of caribou, moose, and bear forage as a function of forest attributes (e.g., basal area, coarse woody debris, soil depth), and assessed differences among harvest, wildfire, and caribou use sites. We found that forest attributes that promoted forage for one species limited forage of another. For example, basal area of deciduous trees was positively related to moose forage and negatively related to caribou winter forage. Our results demonstrate that regardless of disturbance type, regenerating forests can provide seasonal forage for caribou, moose, and bears. Effective habitat management will need to consider not only the dynamic availability of forage following disturbance, but also how these changes in forage influence the spatial interactions of herbivores and predators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article e03636"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wildlife, fire, and forestry: Understanding the spatial and temporal relationships between caribou habitat and disturbance\",\"authors\":\"Ian N. Best , Leonie Brown , Che Elkin , Laura Finnegan , Cameron J.R. McClelland , Chris J. Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gecco.2025.e03636\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Across the boreal forest, timber harvesting and wildfire convert mature forests to early seral stands resulting in habitat loss for specialists like woodland caribou (<em>Rangifer tarandus caribou</em>) and habitat gain for generalists like moose (<em>Alces americanus</em>) and bears (black bears: <em>Ursus americanus</em>, grizzly bears: <em>Ursus arctos</em>). However, there have been few studies on how post-disturbance vegetation communities differ in their value as habitat for these large wildlife species and whether differences vary among disturbance and ecosystem types. We investigated the differential effects of clearcut harvest and wildfire on the habitat of caribou, moose, and bears across the boreal and foothills forests of Alberta, Canada. During 2021 and 2022, we collected tree and understory data from 251 harvested and 264 burned stands (0–40 years post-disturbance), as well as 256 stands with recent caribou use (>40 years post-disturbance). We used generalized linear models to quantify availability of caribou, moose, and bear forage as a function of forest attributes (e.g., basal area, coarse woody debris, soil depth), and assessed differences among harvest, wildfire, and caribou use sites. We found that forest attributes that promoted forage for one species limited forage of another. For example, basal area of deciduous trees was positively related to moose forage and negatively related to caribou winter forage. Our results demonstrate that regardless of disturbance type, regenerating forests can provide seasonal forage for caribou, moose, and bears. Effective habitat management will need to consider not only the dynamic availability of forage following disturbance, but also how these changes in forage influence the spatial interactions of herbivores and predators.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article e03636\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Ecology and Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425002379\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989425002379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Wildlife, fire, and forestry: Understanding the spatial and temporal relationships between caribou habitat and disturbance
Across the boreal forest, timber harvesting and wildfire convert mature forests to early seral stands resulting in habitat loss for specialists like woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) and habitat gain for generalists like moose (Alces americanus) and bears (black bears: Ursus americanus, grizzly bears: Ursus arctos). However, there have been few studies on how post-disturbance vegetation communities differ in their value as habitat for these large wildlife species and whether differences vary among disturbance and ecosystem types. We investigated the differential effects of clearcut harvest and wildfire on the habitat of caribou, moose, and bears across the boreal and foothills forests of Alberta, Canada. During 2021 and 2022, we collected tree and understory data from 251 harvested and 264 burned stands (0–40 years post-disturbance), as well as 256 stands with recent caribou use (>40 years post-disturbance). We used generalized linear models to quantify availability of caribou, moose, and bear forage as a function of forest attributes (e.g., basal area, coarse woody debris, soil depth), and assessed differences among harvest, wildfire, and caribou use sites. We found that forest attributes that promoted forage for one species limited forage of another. For example, basal area of deciduous trees was positively related to moose forage and negatively related to caribou winter forage. Our results demonstrate that regardless of disturbance type, regenerating forests can provide seasonal forage for caribou, moose, and bears. Effective habitat management will need to consider not only the dynamic availability of forage following disturbance, but also how these changes in forage influence the spatial interactions of herbivores and predators.
期刊介绍:
Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.