{"title":"使用多标量时间账户更好地理解语言分离","authors":"Ashley R. Moore","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Linguistic dissociation</em> is “a relatively enduring psychosocial process in which an individual or group distances themselves from a set of linguistic practices already within their repertoire because those practices have come to connote a state of significant intersubjective disharmony, or <em>contrasubjectivity</em>” (Moore, 2023, p. 1152). Generating data to theorise the nature and causes of linguistic dissociation among particular kinds of language users represents a methodological challenge; as intersubjective phenomena, linguistic dissociation and contrasubjectivity emerge across multiple converging, connected temporal scales.</div><div>With reference to data generated with two participants from a larger critical realist grounded theory method investigation into the nature and causes of L1 dissociation among some Japanese-English late plurilinguals, I show how I combined two data generation activities with distinct temporal scales—a multimodal timeline through which participants constructed an account of their affective relationship to Japanese over their lifespan and a two-day language use journal—with follow-up interviews to produce different types of data about linguistic dissociation, which in turn made it possible for the participants and me to construct different forms of knowledge about the phenomenon. Further, I contend that we used those knowledges to arrive at better (i.e., more verisimilitudinous) understandings of the nature and causes of the L1 dissociation they had experienced. I finish by sharing methodological implications for applied linguists investing various intersubjective phenomena that shape the linguistic repertoire and reflecting on the limits of my own knowledge of linguistic dissociation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"4 2","pages":"Article 100212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generating better understandings of linguistic dissociation using multiscalar temporal accounts\",\"authors\":\"Ashley R. Moore\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div><em>Linguistic dissociation</em> is “a relatively enduring psychosocial process in which an individual or group distances themselves from a set of linguistic practices already within their repertoire because those practices have come to connote a state of significant intersubjective disharmony, or <em>contrasubjectivity</em>” (Moore, 2023, p. 1152). Generating data to theorise the nature and causes of linguistic dissociation among particular kinds of language users represents a methodological challenge; as intersubjective phenomena, linguistic dissociation and contrasubjectivity emerge across multiple converging, connected temporal scales.</div><div>With reference to data generated with two participants from a larger critical realist grounded theory method investigation into the nature and causes of L1 dissociation among some Japanese-English late plurilinguals, I show how I combined two data generation activities with distinct temporal scales—a multimodal timeline through which participants constructed an account of their affective relationship to Japanese over their lifespan and a two-day language use journal—with follow-up interviews to produce different types of data about linguistic dissociation, which in turn made it possible for the participants and me to construct different forms of knowledge about the phenomenon. Further, I contend that we used those knowledges to arrive at better (i.e., more verisimilitudinous) understandings of the nature and causes of the L1 dissociation they had experienced. I finish by sharing methodological implications for applied linguists investing various intersubjective phenomena that shape the linguistic repertoire and reflecting on the limits of my own knowledge of linguistic dissociation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000333\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766125000333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
语言分离是“一个相对持久的社会心理过程,在这个过程中,个人或群体将自己与他们已经掌握的一系列语言实践拉开距离,因为这些实践已经包含了一种显著的主体间不和谐状态,或反主体状态”(Moore, 2023, p. 1152)。生成数据来理论化特定类型语言使用者之间的语言分离的性质和原因是一种方法上的挑战;作为主体间现象,语言分离和对立主体性出现在多个收敛的、相互联系的时间尺度上。参考两名参与者的数据,这些数据来自一个更大的基于批判现实主义理论的方法,调查了一些日英晚期多语者的母语分离的性质和原因,我展示了我是如何结合两个具有不同时间尺度的数据生成活动的——一个多模态时间轴,参与者通过它构建了他们一生中对日语的情感关系的描述,以及一个为期两天的语言使用日记——与后续访谈一起产生了关于语言分离的不同类型的数据,这反过来又使参与者和我有可能构建关于这种现象的不同形式的知识。此外,我认为,我们利用这些知识,对他们所经历的L1分离的性质和原因有了更好的(即更逼真的)理解。最后,我分享了应用语言学家投资各种主体间现象的方法含义,这些现象形成了语言的库,并反思了我自己对语言分离的认识的局限性。
Generating better understandings of linguistic dissociation using multiscalar temporal accounts
Linguistic dissociation is “a relatively enduring psychosocial process in which an individual or group distances themselves from a set of linguistic practices already within their repertoire because those practices have come to connote a state of significant intersubjective disharmony, or contrasubjectivity” (Moore, 2023, p. 1152). Generating data to theorise the nature and causes of linguistic dissociation among particular kinds of language users represents a methodological challenge; as intersubjective phenomena, linguistic dissociation and contrasubjectivity emerge across multiple converging, connected temporal scales.
With reference to data generated with two participants from a larger critical realist grounded theory method investigation into the nature and causes of L1 dissociation among some Japanese-English late plurilinguals, I show how I combined two data generation activities with distinct temporal scales—a multimodal timeline through which participants constructed an account of their affective relationship to Japanese over their lifespan and a two-day language use journal—with follow-up interviews to produce different types of data about linguistic dissociation, which in turn made it possible for the participants and me to construct different forms of knowledge about the phenomenon. Further, I contend that we used those knowledges to arrive at better (i.e., more verisimilitudinous) understandings of the nature and causes of the L1 dissociation they had experienced. I finish by sharing methodological implications for applied linguists investing various intersubjective phenomena that shape the linguistic repertoire and reflecting on the limits of my own knowledge of linguistic dissociation.