从点击到护理:探索意大利卫生当局在沟通“全科医生选择”服务方面的数字战略

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alessandro Vinci , Luca Pirrotta , Giulia Venturi , Milena Vainieri
{"title":"从点击到护理:探索意大利卫生当局在沟通“全科医生选择”服务方面的数字战略","authors":"Alessandro Vinci ,&nbsp;Luca Pirrotta ,&nbsp;Giulia Venturi ,&nbsp;Milena Vainieri","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105347","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prioritization of digitalization is crucial to the agendas of nations worldwide. While substantial funds have been allocated to foster it, there remains a scarcity of tools dedicated to systematically monitoring the performance of the digital transformation. This work describes the level of digitalization and information of a fundamental primary care service: the “General Practitioner (GP) selection”. The analysis was conducted by consulting websites of Italian Local Health Authorities (LHAs). First, we explored the digitalization levels of 105 websites through the Primary Care Digital Information (PCDI) composite index. It comprises four dimensions: informativeness, accessibility, inclusiveness, and adaptability, scoring on a five-point scale (low-high digitalization). Second, we conducted a readability analysis, employing three validated measures. We found an average level of digitalization and information, although dimensions perform differently. The best-performing dimension was adaptability, while the worst was inclusiveness. Half of the LHAs provided several digital alternatives to GP selection, while the remaining provided limited or no options. Regarding readability, just 29% of the LHA's websites were found easy to read. Overall, our findings depict that Italian LHAs have different approaches. This study highlights that, despite best practices, several areas require monitoring and intervention. Moreover, some barriers characterize Italian health communication strategies, notably the variability of information across and within regions and on average low website readability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 105347"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From clicks to care: Exploring the digital strategies of Italian health authorities in communicating ‘General Practitioner Selection’ service\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Vinci ,&nbsp;Luca Pirrotta ,&nbsp;Giulia Venturi ,&nbsp;Milena Vainieri\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105347\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The prioritization of digitalization is crucial to the agendas of nations worldwide. While substantial funds have been allocated to foster it, there remains a scarcity of tools dedicated to systematically monitoring the performance of the digital transformation. This work describes the level of digitalization and information of a fundamental primary care service: the “General Practitioner (GP) selection”. The analysis was conducted by consulting websites of Italian Local Health Authorities (LHAs). First, we explored the digitalization levels of 105 websites through the Primary Care Digital Information (PCDI) composite index. It comprises four dimensions: informativeness, accessibility, inclusiveness, and adaptability, scoring on a five-point scale (low-high digitalization). Second, we conducted a readability analysis, employing three validated measures. We found an average level of digitalization and information, although dimensions perform differently. The best-performing dimension was adaptability, while the worst was inclusiveness. Half of the LHAs provided several digital alternatives to GP selection, while the remaining provided limited or no options. Regarding readability, just 29% of the LHA's websites were found easy to read. Overall, our findings depict that Italian LHAs have different approaches. This study highlights that, despite best practices, several areas require monitoring and intervention. Moreover, some barriers characterize Italian health communication strategies, notably the variability of information across and within regions and on average low website readability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"157 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105347\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001034\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字化的优先次序对世界各国的议程至关重要。虽然已经分配了大量资金来促进数字化转型,但仍然缺乏专门用于系统监测数字化转型绩效的工具。这项工作描述了基本初级保健服务的数字化和信息化水平:“全科医生(GP)选择”。该分析是由意大利地方卫生当局(LHAs)的咨询网站进行的。首先,通过初级保健数字信息(PCDI)综合指数,探讨了105家网站的数字化水平。它包括四个方面:信息性、可及性、包容性和适应性,评分为五分制(低-高数字化)。其次,我们进行了可读性分析,采用三种行之有效的措施。我们发现了数字化和信息化的平均水平,尽管维度表现不同。表现最好的维度是适应性,最差的维度是包容性。一半的lha提供了几种数字替代GP选择,而其余的提供有限或没有选择。在易读性方面,只有29%的房委会网站易于阅读。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,意大利的lha有不同的方法。这项研究强调,尽管有最佳做法,但仍有几个领域需要监测和干预。此外,意大利卫生传播战略还存在一些障碍,特别是区域间和区域内信息的可变性,以及网站的平均可读性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From clicks to care: Exploring the digital strategies of Italian health authorities in communicating ‘General Practitioner Selection’ service
The prioritization of digitalization is crucial to the agendas of nations worldwide. While substantial funds have been allocated to foster it, there remains a scarcity of tools dedicated to systematically monitoring the performance of the digital transformation. This work describes the level of digitalization and information of a fundamental primary care service: the “General Practitioner (GP) selection”. The analysis was conducted by consulting websites of Italian Local Health Authorities (LHAs). First, we explored the digitalization levels of 105 websites through the Primary Care Digital Information (PCDI) composite index. It comprises four dimensions: informativeness, accessibility, inclusiveness, and adaptability, scoring on a five-point scale (low-high digitalization). Second, we conducted a readability analysis, employing three validated measures. We found an average level of digitalization and information, although dimensions perform differently. The best-performing dimension was adaptability, while the worst was inclusiveness. Half of the LHAs provided several digital alternatives to GP selection, while the remaining provided limited or no options. Regarding readability, just 29% of the LHA's websites were found easy to read. Overall, our findings depict that Italian LHAs have different approaches. This study highlights that, despite best practices, several areas require monitoring and intervention. Moreover, some barriers characterize Italian health communication strategies, notably the variability of information across and within regions and on average low website readability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信