“男性扮演的角色比以往任何时候都重要”:多布斯判决后女性对安全性行为责任的看法。

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Erin Nolen,Kyla Cary,Rebecca R Mendoza,Shetal Vohra-Gupta,Catherine Cubbin
{"title":"“男性扮演的角色比以往任何时候都重要”:多布斯判决后女性对安全性行为责任的看法。","authors":"Erin Nolen,Kyla Cary,Rebecca R Mendoza,Shetal Vohra-Gupta,Catherine Cubbin","doi":"10.1080/00224499.2025.2499564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in June 2022 revoked the constitutional right to abortion and left abortion policy jurisdiction up to the states. Data were collected in November 2022 through Prolific, a research participant recruitment service, to assess participants' perspectives on safe sex responsibilities in light of the Dobbs decision. Participants were 339 U.S. cisgender women aged 19-29 years (M = 24.4, SD = 2.84). Consensual Qualitative Research - Modified (CQR-M) was used to analyze participants' written responses to the following question: \"How has the overturning of Roe v. Wade impacted the way you think about safe sex responsibilities for men and women, if at all?\" Four domains (with additional sub-categories) were identified: (1) no/minimal change in attitudes; (2) increased importance of shared pregnancy prevention; (3) it's on me (women bear the brunt of the responsibility); and (4) men's responsibilities should be amplified. This study provides an exploratory, high-level account of how U.S. cisgender women initially responded to the Dobbs decision, highlighting the imbalance of safe sex responsibilities and opportunities for normalizing and rectifying men's responsibilities.","PeriodicalId":51361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sex Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"It's More Important Than Ever for Men to Play a Role\\\": Women's Perspectives on Safe Sex Responsibilities Following the Dobbs Decision.\",\"authors\":\"Erin Nolen,Kyla Cary,Rebecca R Mendoza,Shetal Vohra-Gupta,Catherine Cubbin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00224499.2025.2499564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in June 2022 revoked the constitutional right to abortion and left abortion policy jurisdiction up to the states. Data were collected in November 2022 through Prolific, a research participant recruitment service, to assess participants' perspectives on safe sex responsibilities in light of the Dobbs decision. Participants were 339 U.S. cisgender women aged 19-29 years (M = 24.4, SD = 2.84). Consensual Qualitative Research - Modified (CQR-M) was used to analyze participants' written responses to the following question: \\\"How has the overturning of Roe v. Wade impacted the way you think about safe sex responsibilities for men and women, if at all?\\\" Four domains (with additional sub-categories) were identified: (1) no/minimal change in attitudes; (2) increased importance of shared pregnancy prevention; (3) it's on me (women bear the brunt of the responsibility); and (4) men's responsibilities should be amplified. This study provides an exploratory, high-level account of how U.S. cisgender women initially responded to the Dobbs decision, highlighting the imbalance of safe sex responsibilities and opportunities for normalizing and rectifying men's responsibilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sex Research\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sex Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2499564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sex Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2025.2499564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年6月,多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案撤销了宪法规定的堕胎权,并将堕胎政策的管辖权留给了各州。研究参与者招募服务机构多产(高产)于2022年11月收集了数据,以根据多布斯的决定评估参与者对安全性行为责任的看法。参与者是339名美国人年龄19 ~ 29岁的顺性别女性(M = 24.4, SD = 2.84)。双方同意的定性研究-修正(CQR-M)被用来分析参与者对以下问题的书面回答:“罗伊诉韦德案的推翻如何影响你对男性和女性安全性行为责任的看法,如果有的话?”确定了四个领域(包括其他子类别):(1)态度没有或只有很小的变化;(2)共同预防怀孕的重要性增加;(3)责任在我(女性首当其冲);(4)男性的责任应该被放大。这项研究提供了一个探索性的、高层次的描述,说明了美国的异性恋女性最初是如何对多布斯案的决定做出反应的,突出了安全性行为责任的不平衡,以及男性责任正常化和纠正的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"It's More Important Than Ever for Men to Play a Role": Women's Perspectives on Safe Sex Responsibilities Following the Dobbs Decision.
The Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in June 2022 revoked the constitutional right to abortion and left abortion policy jurisdiction up to the states. Data were collected in November 2022 through Prolific, a research participant recruitment service, to assess participants' perspectives on safe sex responsibilities in light of the Dobbs decision. Participants were 339 U.S. cisgender women aged 19-29 years (M = 24.4, SD = 2.84). Consensual Qualitative Research - Modified (CQR-M) was used to analyze participants' written responses to the following question: "How has the overturning of Roe v. Wade impacted the way you think about safe sex responsibilities for men and women, if at all?" Four domains (with additional sub-categories) were identified: (1) no/minimal change in attitudes; (2) increased importance of shared pregnancy prevention; (3) it's on me (women bear the brunt of the responsibility); and (4) men's responsibilities should be amplified. This study provides an exploratory, high-level account of how U.S. cisgender women initially responded to the Dobbs decision, highlighting the imbalance of safe sex responsibilities and opportunities for normalizing and rectifying men's responsibilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sex Research (JSR) is a scholarly journal devoted to the publication of articles relevant to the variety of disciplines involved in the scientific study of sexuality. JSR is designed to stimulate research and promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary sexual science. JSR publishes empirical reports, theoretical essays, literature reviews, methodological articles, historical articles, teaching papers, book reviews, and letters to the editor. JSR actively seeks submissions from researchers outside of North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信