癫痫持续状态协议在认可的国家癫痫中心协会成员之间的差异。

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Laura K Lamberta,Melissa Asmar,Megan M Fredwall,Stephanie M Ahrens,Shasha Bai,Mariah Eisner,Fred Alexander Lado,Stephan U Schuele,Dave F Clarke,Ahmed T Abdelmoity,Kathryn A Davis,Jennifer L Hopp,Mohamad Z Koubeissi,Meriem K Bensalem Owen,Susan T Herman,Adam P Ostendorf,
{"title":"癫痫持续状态协议在认可的国家癫痫中心协会成员之间的差异。","authors":"Laura K Lamberta,Melissa Asmar,Megan M Fredwall,Stephanie M Ahrens,Shasha Bai,Mariah Eisner,Fred Alexander Lado,Stephan U Schuele,Dave F Clarke,Ahmed T Abdelmoity,Kathryn A Davis,Jennifer L Hopp,Mohamad Z Koubeissi,Meriem K Bensalem Owen,Susan T Herman,Adam P Ostendorf,","doi":"10.1212/wnl.0000000000213689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nStatus epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency that requires urgent recognition and medical management. SE management remains heterogeneous across centers.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nWe analyzed SE treatment protocols from level 3 and level 4 epilepsy centers. Discrete data including stabilization measures, timing of treatment phases, medications, doses, and routes of administration were collected from each protocol and described using frequency for categorical variables and median for continuous variables. The distribution of treatment times and dosing were compared with the AES guideline.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 256 SE treatment protocols were included. Only 66% of SE protocols detailed treatment times. Doses below recommendations occurred in 4% of protocols for initial benzodiazepine (BZD) and 14% for first non-BZD medications. Infusion therapy was outlined in 61% of protocols.\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nDespite the importance of timeliness in SE management, one third of institutional protocols did not specify treatment times. This analysis of US hospital inpatient SE protocols provides expert opinion regarding infusion therapy management and highlights gaps and targets for improvement in SE treatment.","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"54 1","pages":"e213689"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status Epilepticus Protocol Variation Across Accredited National Association of Epilepsy Centers Members.\",\"authors\":\"Laura K Lamberta,Melissa Asmar,Megan M Fredwall,Stephanie M Ahrens,Shasha Bai,Mariah Eisner,Fred Alexander Lado,Stephan U Schuele,Dave F Clarke,Ahmed T Abdelmoity,Kathryn A Davis,Jennifer L Hopp,Mohamad Z Koubeissi,Meriem K Bensalem Owen,Susan T Herman,Adam P Ostendorf,\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/wnl.0000000000213689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVES\\r\\nStatus epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency that requires urgent recognition and medical management. SE management remains heterogeneous across centers.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nWe analyzed SE treatment protocols from level 3 and level 4 epilepsy centers. Discrete data including stabilization measures, timing of treatment phases, medications, doses, and routes of administration were collected from each protocol and described using frequency for categorical variables and median for continuous variables. The distribution of treatment times and dosing were compared with the AES guideline.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nA total of 256 SE treatment protocols were included. Only 66% of SE protocols detailed treatment times. Doses below recommendations occurred in 4% of protocols for initial benzodiazepine (BZD) and 14% for first non-BZD medications. Infusion therapy was outlined in 61% of protocols.\\r\\n\\r\\nDISCUSSION\\r\\nDespite the importance of timeliness in SE management, one third of institutional protocols did not specify treatment times. This analysis of US hospital inpatient SE protocols provides expert opinion regarding infusion therapy management and highlights gaps and targets for improvement in SE treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"e213689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000213689\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000213689","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的癫痫持续状态(SE)是一种需要紧急识别和医学处理的神经急症。跨中心的SE管理仍然是异构的。方法分析3级和4级癫痫中心的SE治疗方案。从每个方案中收集离散数据,包括稳定措施、治疗阶段的时间、药物、剂量和给药途径,并使用分类变量的频率和连续变量的中位数进行描述。将治疗时间和剂量分布与AES指南进行比较。结果共纳入256个SE处理方案。只有66%的SE方案详细说明了治疗时间。首次使用苯二氮卓类药物(BZD)的方案中有4%的剂量低于推荐剂量,首次使用非BZD的方案中有14%的剂量低于推荐剂量。61%的方案概述了输液治疗。尽管SE管理的及时性很重要,但三分之一的机构方案没有指定治疗时间。本文对美国住院患者SE方案的分析提供了关于输液治疗管理的专家意见,并强调了SE治疗的差距和改进目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Status Epilepticus Protocol Variation Across Accredited National Association of Epilepsy Centers Members.
OBJECTIVES Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency that requires urgent recognition and medical management. SE management remains heterogeneous across centers. METHODS We analyzed SE treatment protocols from level 3 and level 4 epilepsy centers. Discrete data including stabilization measures, timing of treatment phases, medications, doses, and routes of administration were collected from each protocol and described using frequency for categorical variables and median for continuous variables. The distribution of treatment times and dosing were compared with the AES guideline. RESULTS A total of 256 SE treatment protocols were included. Only 66% of SE protocols detailed treatment times. Doses below recommendations occurred in 4% of protocols for initial benzodiazepine (BZD) and 14% for first non-BZD medications. Infusion therapy was outlined in 61% of protocols. DISCUSSION Despite the importance of timeliness in SE management, one third of institutional protocols did not specify treatment times. This analysis of US hospital inpatient SE protocols provides expert opinion regarding infusion therapy management and highlights gaps and targets for improvement in SE treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信