非药物干预对肝移植患者焦虑、抑郁、睡眠障碍和生活质量的比较疗效:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Min Li, Binyang Yu, Haiyan Yang, Haiyan He, Rui Gao
{"title":"非药物干预对肝移植患者焦虑、抑郁、睡眠障碍和生活质量的比较疗效:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Min Li, Binyang Yu, Haiyan Yang, Haiyan He, Rui Gao","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare and rank the efficacy of different non-pharmacological interventions on anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and the quality of life in liver transplantation patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, numerous non-pharmacological interventions have been developed to address anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and the quality of life in liver transplantation patients. However, it remains unclear which non-pharmacological intervention serves as the most effective and preferred approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and network meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant randomised controlled trials were extracted from eight electronic databases. A network meta-analysis was then performed to evaluate the relative efficacy of the non-pharmacological interventions for liver transplantation patients. The quality of the data was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We registered this study in PROSPERO, number CRD42023450346.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 randomised controlled trials were included. Spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, individualised psychological intervention, and cognitive behavioural therapy were found to be significantly effective for both anxiety and depression. The top three interventions against anxiety were spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, individualised psychological intervention, and exercise rehabilitation training. Meanwhile, individualised psychological intervention, spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, and cognitive behavioural therapy were the top-ranked three interventions for reducing depression. Sleep hygiene education was the most effective to improve sleep disorders. Continuous care based on a mobile medical platform emerged as the most effective intervention in improving the quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several non-pharmacological interventions appeared to be effective in treating anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and improving the quality of life among liver transplantation patients. More high-quality clinical trials should be incorporated in the future to investigate the reliability of existing findings.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Healthcare professionals should be encouraged to apply these promising non-pharmacological interventions during clinical care.</p><p><strong>No patient or public contribution: </strong>This study did not directly involve patients or public contributions to the manuscript.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Disorder, and Quality of Life in Patients With Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Min Li, Binyang Yu, Haiyan Yang, Haiyan He, Rui Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.17753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To compare and rank the efficacy of different non-pharmacological interventions on anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and the quality of life in liver transplantation patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, numerous non-pharmacological interventions have been developed to address anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and the quality of life in liver transplantation patients. However, it remains unclear which non-pharmacological intervention serves as the most effective and preferred approach.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and network meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Relevant randomised controlled trials were extracted from eight electronic databases. A network meta-analysis was then performed to evaluate the relative efficacy of the non-pharmacological interventions for liver transplantation patients. The quality of the data was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We registered this study in PROSPERO, number CRD42023450346.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 25 randomised controlled trials were included. Spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, individualised psychological intervention, and cognitive behavioural therapy were found to be significantly effective for both anxiety and depression. The top three interventions against anxiety were spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, individualised psychological intervention, and exercise rehabilitation training. Meanwhile, individualised psychological intervention, spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, and cognitive behavioural therapy were the top-ranked three interventions for reducing depression. Sleep hygiene education was the most effective to improve sleep disorders. Continuous care based on a mobile medical platform emerged as the most effective intervention in improving the quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several non-pharmacological interventions appeared to be effective in treating anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and improving the quality of life among liver transplantation patients. More high-quality clinical trials should be incorporated in the future to investigate the reliability of existing findings.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Healthcare professionals should be encouraged to apply these promising non-pharmacological interventions during clinical care.</p><p><strong>No patient or public contribution: </strong>This study did not directly involve patients or public contributions to the manuscript.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17753\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17753","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较不同非药物干预对肝移植患者焦虑、抑郁、睡眠障碍和生活质量的影响并进行排序。背景:近年来,许多非药物干预措施已经被开发出来,以解决肝移植患者的焦虑、抑郁、睡眠障碍和生活质量。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种非药物干预是最有效和首选的方法。设计:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析。方法:从8个电子数据库中提取相关的随机对照试验。然后进行网络荟萃分析,以评估非药物干预对肝移植患者的相对疗效。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估数据质量。我们在PROSPERO注册了这项研究,编号为CRD42023450346。结果:共纳入25项随机对照试验。配偶支持教育结合正念训练、个性化心理干预和认知行为疗法被发现对焦虑和抑郁都非常有效。抗焦虑的前三大干预措施是配偶支持教育结合正念训练、个性化心理干预和运动康复训练。与此同时,个体化心理干预、配偶支持教育结合正念训练和认知行为疗法是减少抑郁症的前三种干预措施。睡眠卫生教育对改善睡眠障碍最有效。基于移动医疗平台的持续护理已成为改善生活质量的最有效干预措施。结论:几种非药物干预措施可有效治疗肝移植患者的焦虑、抑郁、睡眠障碍,改善患者的生活质量。未来应纳入更多高质量的临床试验,以调查现有发现的可靠性。与临床实践的相关性:应鼓励医疗保健专业人员在临床护理中应用这些有前途的非药物干预措施。无患者或公众贡献:本研究没有直接涉及患者或公众对稿件的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Efficacy of Non-Pharmacological Interventions on Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Disorder, and Quality of Life in Patients With Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Aims: To compare and rank the efficacy of different non-pharmacological interventions on anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and the quality of life in liver transplantation patients.

Background: In recent years, numerous non-pharmacological interventions have been developed to address anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and the quality of life in liver transplantation patients. However, it remains unclear which non-pharmacological intervention serves as the most effective and preferred approach.

Design: A systematic review and network meta-analysis in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

Methods: Relevant randomised controlled trials were extracted from eight electronic databases. A network meta-analysis was then performed to evaluate the relative efficacy of the non-pharmacological interventions for liver transplantation patients. The quality of the data was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. We registered this study in PROSPERO, number CRD42023450346.

Results: A total of 25 randomised controlled trials were included. Spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, individualised psychological intervention, and cognitive behavioural therapy were found to be significantly effective for both anxiety and depression. The top three interventions against anxiety were spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, individualised psychological intervention, and exercise rehabilitation training. Meanwhile, individualised psychological intervention, spouse support education combined with mindfulness training, and cognitive behavioural therapy were the top-ranked three interventions for reducing depression. Sleep hygiene education was the most effective to improve sleep disorders. Continuous care based on a mobile medical platform emerged as the most effective intervention in improving the quality of life.

Conclusion: Several non-pharmacological interventions appeared to be effective in treating anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and improving the quality of life among liver transplantation patients. More high-quality clinical trials should be incorporated in the future to investigate the reliability of existing findings.

Relevance to clinical practice: Healthcare professionals should be encouraged to apply these promising non-pharmacological interventions during clinical care.

No patient or public contribution: This study did not directly involve patients or public contributions to the manuscript.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信