口腔扁平苔藓病变与口腔类苔藓病变组织形态学比较。

IF 3.2 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Ana Carla Barletta Sanches, Juliana Santos de Jesus Azevedo, Liliana Aparecida Pimenta-Barros, Valéria Souza Freitas, Danielle Resende Camisasca, Gabriela Botelho Martins
{"title":"口腔扁平苔藓病变与口腔类苔藓病变组织形态学比较。","authors":"Ana Carla Barletta Sanches, Juliana Santos de Jesus Azevedo, Liliana Aparecida Pimenta-Barros, Valéria Souza Freitas, Danielle Resende Camisasca, Gabriela Botelho Martins","doi":"10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are considered potentially malignant oral disorders, presenting with similar clinical and histopathological manifestations that make differential diagnosis difficult and reinforce the need for new techniques for their evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of OLP and OLL.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on 30 histological sections of incisional biopsies of OLP and OLL stained with hematoxylin-eosin for the analysis of morphological parameters, such as keratosis, acanthosis, inflammatory infiltrate band, eosinophilic band, degeneration of the basal layer, involvement of the epithelium-chorion interface, and degree of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate; and morphometric parameters, such as keratin thickness, distance from the basal layer to the epithelial surface, and thickness of the inflammatory infiltrate band. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables and injury types. The t-test was used to compare morphometric variables between the two types of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant association between the type of lesion and the clinical characteristics of the patients (p > 0.05). The degree of dysplasia, used as an inclusion criterion, was associated with lesion type (p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences between the morphometric variables evaluated for the two types of lesions (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the methodology used and the sample established for this study, there were clinical and histomorphometric similarities between OLP and OLL. This justifies further discussion on whether these lesions are a spectrum of presentations of the same condition or truly distinct conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":"19 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Histomorphometric Aspects between Oral Lichen Planus Lesions and Oral Lichenoid Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Carla Barletta Sanches, Juliana Santos de Jesus Azevedo, Liliana Aparecida Pimenta-Barros, Valéria Souza Freitas, Danielle Resende Camisasca, Gabriela Botelho Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are considered potentially malignant oral disorders, presenting with similar clinical and histopathological manifestations that make differential diagnosis difficult and reinforce the need for new techniques for their evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of OLP and OLL.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on 30 histological sections of incisional biopsies of OLP and OLL stained with hematoxylin-eosin for the analysis of morphological parameters, such as keratosis, acanthosis, inflammatory infiltrate band, eosinophilic band, degeneration of the basal layer, involvement of the epithelium-chorion interface, and degree of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate; and morphometric parameters, such as keratin thickness, distance from the basal layer to the epithelial surface, and thickness of the inflammatory infiltrate band. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables and injury types. The t-test was used to compare morphometric variables between the two types of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant association between the type of lesion and the clinical characteristics of the patients (p > 0.05). The degree of dysplasia, used as an inclusion criterion, was associated with lesion type (p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences between the morphometric variables evaluated for the two types of lesions (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the methodology used and the sample established for this study, there were clinical and histomorphometric similarities between OLP and OLL. This justifies further discussion on whether these lesions are a spectrum of presentations of the same condition or truly distinct conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Neck Pathology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078739/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Neck Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口腔扁平苔藓(OLP)和口腔苔藓样病变(OLL)被认为是潜在的恶性口腔疾病,表现出相似的临床和组织病理学表现,使得鉴别诊断变得困难,并加强了对新技术评估的需求。目的:比较OLP和OLL的组织形态学特征。方法:本回顾性横断面研究基于30张OLP和苏木精-伊红染色的OLL切口活检组织学切片,分析形态学参数,如角化病、棘层增生、炎症浸润带、嗜酸性带、基底层变性、上皮-绒毛膜界面受损伤、上皮下炎症浸润程度;形态学参数,如角蛋白厚度,从基底层到上皮表面的距离,炎症浸润带的厚度。使用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较分类变量和损伤类型。采用t检验比较两种损伤的形态计量变量。结果:病变类型与患者临床特征无显著相关性(p < 0.05)。作为纳入标准的发育不良程度与病变类型相关(p = 0.0003)。两种类型病变的形态计量变量评估无显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论:根据本研究使用的方法和建立的样本,OLP和OLL在临床和组织形态学上存在相似性。这证明了进一步讨论这些病变是同一病症的一系列表现还是真正不同的病症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Histomorphometric Aspects between Oral Lichen Planus Lesions and Oral Lichenoid Lesions.

Introduction: Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are considered potentially malignant oral disorders, presenting with similar clinical and histopathological manifestations that make differential diagnosis difficult and reinforce the need for new techniques for their evaluation.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of OLP and OLL.

Methodology: This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on 30 histological sections of incisional biopsies of OLP and OLL stained with hematoxylin-eosin for the analysis of morphological parameters, such as keratosis, acanthosis, inflammatory infiltrate band, eosinophilic band, degeneration of the basal layer, involvement of the epithelium-chorion interface, and degree of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate; and morphometric parameters, such as keratin thickness, distance from the basal layer to the epithelial surface, and thickness of the inflammatory infiltrate band. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables and injury types. The t-test was used to compare morphometric variables between the two types of injury.

Results: There was no significant association between the type of lesion and the clinical characteristics of the patients (p > 0.05). The degree of dysplasia, used as an inclusion criterion, was associated with lesion type (p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences between the morphometric variables evaluated for the two types of lesions (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: Based on the methodology used and the sample established for this study, there were clinical and histomorphometric similarities between OLP and OLL. This justifies further discussion on whether these lesions are a spectrum of presentations of the same condition or truly distinct conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck. The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field. Single-blind peer review The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信