Ana Carla Barletta Sanches, Juliana Santos de Jesus Azevedo, Liliana Aparecida Pimenta-Barros, Valéria Souza Freitas, Danielle Resende Camisasca, Gabriela Botelho Martins
{"title":"口腔扁平苔藓病变与口腔类苔藓病变组织形态学比较。","authors":"Ana Carla Barletta Sanches, Juliana Santos de Jesus Azevedo, Liliana Aparecida Pimenta-Barros, Valéria Souza Freitas, Danielle Resende Camisasca, Gabriela Botelho Martins","doi":"10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are considered potentially malignant oral disorders, presenting with similar clinical and histopathological manifestations that make differential diagnosis difficult and reinforce the need for new techniques for their evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of OLP and OLL.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on 30 histological sections of incisional biopsies of OLP and OLL stained with hematoxylin-eosin for the analysis of morphological parameters, such as keratosis, acanthosis, inflammatory infiltrate band, eosinophilic band, degeneration of the basal layer, involvement of the epithelium-chorion interface, and degree of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate; and morphometric parameters, such as keratin thickness, distance from the basal layer to the epithelial surface, and thickness of the inflammatory infiltrate band. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables and injury types. The t-test was used to compare morphometric variables between the two types of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant association between the type of lesion and the clinical characteristics of the patients (p > 0.05). The degree of dysplasia, used as an inclusion criterion, was associated with lesion type (p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences between the morphometric variables evaluated for the two types of lesions (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the methodology used and the sample established for this study, there were clinical and histomorphometric similarities between OLP and OLL. This justifies further discussion on whether these lesions are a spectrum of presentations of the same condition or truly distinct conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47972,"journal":{"name":"Head & Neck Pathology","volume":"19 1","pages":"61"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Histomorphometric Aspects between Oral Lichen Planus Lesions and Oral Lichenoid Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Carla Barletta Sanches, Juliana Santos de Jesus Azevedo, Liliana Aparecida Pimenta-Barros, Valéria Souza Freitas, Danielle Resende Camisasca, Gabriela Botelho Martins\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are considered potentially malignant oral disorders, presenting with similar clinical and histopathological manifestations that make differential diagnosis difficult and reinforce the need for new techniques for their evaluation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of OLP and OLL.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on 30 histological sections of incisional biopsies of OLP and OLL stained with hematoxylin-eosin for the analysis of morphological parameters, such as keratosis, acanthosis, inflammatory infiltrate band, eosinophilic band, degeneration of the basal layer, involvement of the epithelium-chorion interface, and degree of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate; and morphometric parameters, such as keratin thickness, distance from the basal layer to the epithelial surface, and thickness of the inflammatory infiltrate band. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables and injury types. The t-test was used to compare morphometric variables between the two types of injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant association between the type of lesion and the clinical characteristics of the patients (p > 0.05). The degree of dysplasia, used as an inclusion criterion, was associated with lesion type (p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences between the morphometric variables evaluated for the two types of lesions (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the methodology used and the sample established for this study, there were clinical and histomorphometric similarities between OLP and OLL. This justifies further discussion on whether these lesions are a spectrum of presentations of the same condition or truly distinct conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Head & Neck Pathology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078739/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Head & Neck Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Head & Neck Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-025-01791-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Histomorphometric Aspects between Oral Lichen Planus Lesions and Oral Lichenoid Lesions.
Introduction: Oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) are considered potentially malignant oral disorders, presenting with similar clinical and histopathological manifestations that make differential diagnosis difficult and reinforce the need for new techniques for their evaluation.
Objective: This study aimed to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of OLP and OLL.
Methodology: This retrospective cross-sectional study was based on 30 histological sections of incisional biopsies of OLP and OLL stained with hematoxylin-eosin for the analysis of morphological parameters, such as keratosis, acanthosis, inflammatory infiltrate band, eosinophilic band, degeneration of the basal layer, involvement of the epithelium-chorion interface, and degree of subepithelial inflammatory infiltrate; and morphometric parameters, such as keratin thickness, distance from the basal layer to the epithelial surface, and thickness of the inflammatory infiltrate band. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to compare categorical variables and injury types. The t-test was used to compare morphometric variables between the two types of injury.
Results: There was no significant association between the type of lesion and the clinical characteristics of the patients (p > 0.05). The degree of dysplasia, used as an inclusion criterion, was associated with lesion type (p = 0.0003). There were no significant differences between the morphometric variables evaluated for the two types of lesions (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Based on the methodology used and the sample established for this study, there were clinical and histomorphometric similarities between OLP and OLL. This justifies further discussion on whether these lesions are a spectrum of presentations of the same condition or truly distinct conditions.
期刊介绍:
Head & Neck Pathology presents scholarly papers, reviews and symposia that cover the spectrum of human surgical pathology within the anatomic zones of the oral cavity, sinonasal tract, larynx, hypopharynx, salivary gland, ear and temporal bone, and neck.
The journal publishes rapid developments in new diagnostic criteria, intraoperative consultation, immunohistochemical studies, molecular techniques, genetic analyses, diagnostic aids, experimental pathology, cytology, radiographic imaging, and application of uniform terminology to allow practitioners to continue to maintain and expand their knowledge in the subspecialty of head and neck pathology. Coverage of practical application to daily clinical practice is supported with proceedings and symposia from international societies and academies devoted to this field.
Single-blind peer review
The journal follows a single-blind review procedure, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. Single-blind peer review is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.