社交媒体对唇腭裂的描述:Instagram vs YouTube短片分析:Instagram Post vs Instagram Reel分析。

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2025-01-03 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3390/cmtr18010004
Joshua Lewis, Manav Patel, Nangah Tabukumm, Wei-Chen Lee
{"title":"社交媒体对唇腭裂的描述:Instagram vs YouTube短片分析:Instagram Post vs Instagram Reel分析。","authors":"Joshua Lewis, Manav Patel, Nangah Tabukumm, Wei-Chen Lee","doi":"10.3390/cmtr18010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative analysis study.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social media has been pivotal in the dissemination of medical knowledge to the public. The aim was to identify the demographics of individuals posting about cleft lip and palate on YouTube Shorts and Instagram, to characterize the content of these posts, and to highlight factors that could aid surgeons in better educating patients with cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Instagram posts and YouTube Shorts with \"#cleftlip\", \"#cleftawareness\", \"#cleftpalate\", \"#cleftplipandpalate\", and \"#cleftproud\" were searched on 8 June 2024. Postings were subclassified and analyzed for content, including topics of posts, authors, media type, tone of the post, and year of post.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3321 posts were analyzed, with 2698 coming from Instagram and 623 from YouTube Shorts. The majority of content creators were patients and their family members (<i>n</i> = 2054, 61.8%), cleft lip and palate foundations (<i>n</i> = 384, 11.6%), and companies (<i>n</i> = 381, 11.5%). Only 167 posts were authored by physicians (5.1%). Among the educational and informational posts, patients and family members accounted for the majority of the posts (409 posts, 57.7%). Physicians contributed to a small fraction of the educational content (37 posts, 5.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physician participation in the cleft lip and palate social media realm on Instagram and YouTube Shorts was found to be limited. Moreover, there was a scarcity of educational content on both platforms, indicating a significant opportunity for physicians to engage more actively in cleft lip and palate social media discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"18 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Media Depiction of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate: Instagram Versus YouTube Shorts Analysis: Instagram Post Versus Instagram Reel Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Lewis, Manav Patel, Nangah Tabukumm, Wei-Chen Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cmtr18010004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Qualitative analysis study.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Social media has been pivotal in the dissemination of medical knowledge to the public. The aim was to identify the demographics of individuals posting about cleft lip and palate on YouTube Shorts and Instagram, to characterize the content of these posts, and to highlight factors that could aid surgeons in better educating patients with cleft lip and palate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Instagram posts and YouTube Shorts with \\\"#cleftlip\\\", \\\"#cleftawareness\\\", \\\"#cleftpalate\\\", \\\"#cleftplipandpalate\\\", and \\\"#cleftproud\\\" were searched on 8 June 2024. Postings were subclassified and analyzed for content, including topics of posts, authors, media type, tone of the post, and year of post.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3321 posts were analyzed, with 2698 coming from Instagram and 623 from YouTube Shorts. The majority of content creators were patients and their family members (<i>n</i> = 2054, 61.8%), cleft lip and palate foundations (<i>n</i> = 384, 11.6%), and companies (<i>n</i> = 381, 11.5%). Only 167 posts were authored by physicians (5.1%). Among the educational and informational posts, patients and family members accounted for the majority of the posts (409 posts, 57.7%). Physicians contributed to a small fraction of the educational content (37 posts, 5.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physician participation in the cleft lip and palate social media realm on Instagram and YouTube Shorts was found to be limited. Moreover, there was a scarcity of educational content on both platforms, indicating a significant opportunity for physicians to engage more actively in cleft lip and palate social media discussions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18010004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:定性分析研究。引言:社交媒体在向公众传播医学知识方面发挥了关键作用。目的是确定在YouTube短片和Instagram上发布有关唇腭裂的个人的人口统计数据,描述这些帖子的内容,并强调可以帮助外科医生更好地教育唇腭裂患者的因素。方法:在2024年6月8日搜索带有“#cleftlip”、“# cleftaawareness”、“#cleftpalate”、“#cleftplipandpalate”和“#cleftproud”字样的Instagram帖子和YouTube短片。根据文章的主题、作者、媒体类型、语气、发表年份等内容进行分类和分析。结果:共分析了3321条帖子,其中2698条来自Instagram, 623条来自YouTube Shorts。内容创作者主要为患者及其家属(n = 2054, 61.8%)、唇腭裂基金会(n = 384, 11.6%)和公司(n = 381, 11.5%)。只有167篇文章是由医生撰写的(5.1%)。在教育信息类帖子中,以患者和家属为主(409篇,占57.7%)。医生贡献了一小部分教育内容(37个帖子,5.2%)。结论:医生在Instagram和YouTube短片上参与唇腭裂社交媒体领域的程度有限。此外,这两个平台上缺乏教育内容,这表明医生有很大的机会更积极地参与唇腭裂的社交媒体讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Social Media Depiction of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate: Instagram Versus YouTube Shorts Analysis: Instagram Post Versus Instagram Reel Analysis.

Social Media Depiction of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate: Instagram Versus YouTube Shorts Analysis: Instagram Post Versus Instagram Reel Analysis.

Social Media Depiction of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate: Instagram Versus YouTube Shorts Analysis: Instagram Post Versus Instagram Reel Analysis.

Social Media Depiction of Cleft Lip and Cleft Palate: Instagram Versus YouTube Shorts Analysis: Instagram Post Versus Instagram Reel Analysis.

Study design: Qualitative analysis study.

Introduction: Social media has been pivotal in the dissemination of medical knowledge to the public. The aim was to identify the demographics of individuals posting about cleft lip and palate on YouTube Shorts and Instagram, to characterize the content of these posts, and to highlight factors that could aid surgeons in better educating patients with cleft lip and palate.

Methods: Instagram posts and YouTube Shorts with "#cleftlip", "#cleftawareness", "#cleftpalate", "#cleftplipandpalate", and "#cleftproud" were searched on 8 June 2024. Postings were subclassified and analyzed for content, including topics of posts, authors, media type, tone of the post, and year of post.

Results: A total of 3321 posts were analyzed, with 2698 coming from Instagram and 623 from YouTube Shorts. The majority of content creators were patients and their family members (n = 2054, 61.8%), cleft lip and palate foundations (n = 384, 11.6%), and companies (n = 381, 11.5%). Only 167 posts were authored by physicians (5.1%). Among the educational and informational posts, patients and family members accounted for the majority of the posts (409 posts, 57.7%). Physicians contributed to a small fraction of the educational content (37 posts, 5.2%).

Conclusions: Physician participation in the cleft lip and palate social media realm on Instagram and YouTube Shorts was found to be limited. Moreover, there was a scarcity of educational content on both platforms, indicating a significant opportunity for physicians to engage more actively in cleft lip and palate social media discussions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信