保留括约肌的全瘘管切除术,切除肛肠和皮肤,关闭括约肌间隙治疗肛瘘。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Yoshiro Iida, Katuhiko Honda, Hideo Saitou, Yoshinori Munemoto, Reiko Iida, Akiyosi Tanaka
{"title":"保留括约肌的全瘘管切除术,切除肛肠和皮肤,关闭括约肌间隙治疗肛瘘。","authors":"Yoshiro Iida, Katuhiko Honda, Hideo Saitou, Yoshinori Munemoto, Reiko Iida, Akiyosi Tanaka","doi":"10.1007/s13304-025-02195-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-cure, recurrence and faecal incontinence have often been a major challenge in patients after surgical treatment for anal fistula. To overcome these problems, we have developed a sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy procedure involving resection of the anoderm and skin with intersphincteric space closure (TFRAS). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate this TFRAS technique. TFRAS was performed in 618 patients. The method involved excision of the anoderm and skin, including the internal opening, total removal of the fistula tract while preserving the sphincter, closure of the resulting intersphincteric space and open wound. The Parks classification was used, and subcutaneous, supralevatoric, and unclassifiable fistulas not included in this classification were newly defined and evaluated. The postoperative cure rate was 97.7% and the recurrence rate was 0.7%. The non-cure rate was significantly higher for supralevatoric fistulas and the recurrence rate was significantly higher for unclassifiable fistulas. No cases of postoperative solid faecal incontinence were observed, and the faecal incontinence rate was 0.7%. The mean postoperative Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence (CCFI) score was 0.9, and the highest value of 8 was observed in only one case. No significant differences were found between the classifications based on faecal incontinence rates and the CCFI score. There was no significant difference in CCFI score between patients who underwent TFRAS at only one site and those who did so at two or more sites. TFRAS is considered a useful technique for anal fistulas, offering a high cure rate, a low recurrence rate, and no severe postoperative faecal incontinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy with resection of the anoderm and skin and intersphincteric space closure for anal fistula.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshiro Iida, Katuhiko Honda, Hideo Saitou, Yoshinori Munemoto, Reiko Iida, Akiyosi Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13304-025-02195-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Non-cure, recurrence and faecal incontinence have often been a major challenge in patients after surgical treatment for anal fistula. To overcome these problems, we have developed a sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy procedure involving resection of the anoderm and skin with intersphincteric space closure (TFRAS). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate this TFRAS technique. TFRAS was performed in 618 patients. The method involved excision of the anoderm and skin, including the internal opening, total removal of the fistula tract while preserving the sphincter, closure of the resulting intersphincteric space and open wound. The Parks classification was used, and subcutaneous, supralevatoric, and unclassifiable fistulas not included in this classification were newly defined and evaluated. The postoperative cure rate was 97.7% and the recurrence rate was 0.7%. The non-cure rate was significantly higher for supralevatoric fistulas and the recurrence rate was significantly higher for unclassifiable fistulas. No cases of postoperative solid faecal incontinence were observed, and the faecal incontinence rate was 0.7%. The mean postoperative Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence (CCFI) score was 0.9, and the highest value of 8 was observed in only one case. No significant differences were found between the classifications based on faecal incontinence rates and the CCFI score. There was no significant difference in CCFI score between patients who underwent TFRAS at only one site and those who did so at two or more sites. TFRAS is considered a useful technique for anal fistulas, offering a high cure rate, a low recurrence rate, and no severe postoperative faecal incontinence.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Updates in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02195-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-025-02195-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无法治愈、复发和大便失禁一直是肛瘘手术治疗后患者面临的主要挑战。为了克服这些问题,我们开发了一种保留括约肌的全瘘管切除术,包括切除肛肠和皮肤并关闭括约肌间隙(TFRAS)。本研究的目的是评价这种TFRAS技术。618例患者行TFRAS。该方法包括切除肛肠和皮肤,包括内部开口,在保留括约肌的情况下完全切除瘘道,关闭由此产生的括约肌间隙和开放伤口。使用Parks分类,并重新定义和评估未包括在该分类中的皮下、上睑瘘和无法分类的瘘。术后治愈率97.7%,复发率0.7%。上睑瘘管的不治愈率明显高于上睑瘘管,无法分类的瘘管的复发率明显高于上睑瘘管。术后未见固体性大便失禁,大便失禁率为0.7%。术后克利夫兰临床粪便失禁(Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence, CCFI)平均评分为0.9,最高值为8,仅有1例。基于大便失禁率的分类与CCFI评分之间无显著差异。仅在一个部位接受TFRAS的患者与在两个或多个部位接受TFRAS的患者之间的CCFI评分无显著差异。TFRAS被认为是一种治疗肛瘘的有效技术,治愈率高,复发率低,术后无严重的大便失禁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy with resection of the anoderm and skin and intersphincteric space closure for anal fistula.

Non-cure, recurrence and faecal incontinence have often been a major challenge in patients after surgical treatment for anal fistula. To overcome these problems, we have developed a sphincter-preserving total fistulectomy procedure involving resection of the anoderm and skin with intersphincteric space closure (TFRAS). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate this TFRAS technique. TFRAS was performed in 618 patients. The method involved excision of the anoderm and skin, including the internal opening, total removal of the fistula tract while preserving the sphincter, closure of the resulting intersphincteric space and open wound. The Parks classification was used, and subcutaneous, supralevatoric, and unclassifiable fistulas not included in this classification were newly defined and evaluated. The postoperative cure rate was 97.7% and the recurrence rate was 0.7%. The non-cure rate was significantly higher for supralevatoric fistulas and the recurrence rate was significantly higher for unclassifiable fistulas. No cases of postoperative solid faecal incontinence were observed, and the faecal incontinence rate was 0.7%. The mean postoperative Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence (CCFI) score was 0.9, and the highest value of 8 was observed in only one case. No significant differences were found between the classifications based on faecal incontinence rates and the CCFI score. There was no significant difference in CCFI score between patients who underwent TFRAS at only one site and those who did so at two or more sites. TFRAS is considered a useful technique for anal fistulas, offering a high cure rate, a low recurrence rate, and no severe postoperative faecal incontinence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信