Monica M Matsumoto, Ann Cun, Corinne DeSanto, Anna Paycardo, S William Stavropoulos, Scott O Trerotola
{"title":"管理有效的IVC过滤器检索系统:前瞻性患者数据库的结果,2012-2023。","authors":"Monica M Matsumoto, Ann Cun, Corinne DeSanto, Anna Paycardo, S William Stavropoulos, Scott O Trerotola","doi":"10.1186/s42155-025-00550-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter outcomes with a prospectively maintained database and active patient management by interventional radiology (IR).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Patients with retrievable IVC filters placed by IR from 2012 to 2023 at a single, tertiary institution were tracked in a prospective registry, and follow-up was organized by a designated IR physician assistant. Patients were contacted after the filter was placed by IR and a clinic visit arranged; filter removal was scheduled when deemed appropriate. Retrospective review of filter outcomes, including retrieval, patient death, and need for permanent filtration, was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 12-year study period, 607 retrievable IVC filters were placed: 516 Denali, 63 Eclipse, 19 Günther Tulip, and 9 Celect Platinum. In total, 43% (260) were retrieved, 12% (75) were adjudicated to be permanent, and 42% (253) died with the filter in place. The remaining 3% (19) comprised patients alive with the filter not yet retrieved at study endpoint, 42% (8/19) of which were placed in 2023. Of this cohort, 8 still needed the filter and were being monitored to determine follow-up timing, 2 needed a follow-up appointment, and 9 were lost to follow-up due to repeated no-shows and/or inability to reach the patient despite multiple attempts. Overall, 1.5% (9/607) of all filters placed were not accounted for.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates high accountability (98.5%) of retrievable IVC filters when using a prospective registry actively managed by an IR PA, providing an effective and feasible model for facilitating appropriate follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":52351,"journal":{"name":"CVIR Endovascular","volume":"8 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034602/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing an effective system for retrieving IVC filters: outcomes of a prospective patient database, 2012-2023.\",\"authors\":\"Monica M Matsumoto, Ann Cun, Corinne DeSanto, Anna Paycardo, S William Stavropoulos, Scott O Trerotola\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42155-025-00550-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter outcomes with a prospectively maintained database and active patient management by interventional radiology (IR).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Patients with retrievable IVC filters placed by IR from 2012 to 2023 at a single, tertiary institution were tracked in a prospective registry, and follow-up was organized by a designated IR physician assistant. Patients were contacted after the filter was placed by IR and a clinic visit arranged; filter removal was scheduled when deemed appropriate. Retrospective review of filter outcomes, including retrieval, patient death, and need for permanent filtration, was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the 12-year study period, 607 retrievable IVC filters were placed: 516 Denali, 63 Eclipse, 19 Günther Tulip, and 9 Celect Platinum. In total, 43% (260) were retrieved, 12% (75) were adjudicated to be permanent, and 42% (253) died with the filter in place. The remaining 3% (19) comprised patients alive with the filter not yet retrieved at study endpoint, 42% (8/19) of which were placed in 2023. Of this cohort, 8 still needed the filter and were being monitored to determine follow-up timing, 2 needed a follow-up appointment, and 9 were lost to follow-up due to repeated no-shows and/or inability to reach the patient despite multiple attempts. Overall, 1.5% (9/607) of all filters placed were not accounted for.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates high accountability (98.5%) of retrievable IVC filters when using a prospective registry actively managed by an IR PA, providing an effective and feasible model for facilitating appropriate follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034602/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CVIR Endovascular\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-025-00550-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CVIR Endovascular","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42155-025-00550-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Managing an effective system for retrieving IVC filters: outcomes of a prospective patient database, 2012-2023.
Purpose: To evaluate retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter outcomes with a prospectively maintained database and active patient management by interventional radiology (IR).
Materials & methods: Patients with retrievable IVC filters placed by IR from 2012 to 2023 at a single, tertiary institution were tracked in a prospective registry, and follow-up was organized by a designated IR physician assistant. Patients were contacted after the filter was placed by IR and a clinic visit arranged; filter removal was scheduled when deemed appropriate. Retrospective review of filter outcomes, including retrieval, patient death, and need for permanent filtration, was performed.
Results: Over the 12-year study period, 607 retrievable IVC filters were placed: 516 Denali, 63 Eclipse, 19 Günther Tulip, and 9 Celect Platinum. In total, 43% (260) were retrieved, 12% (75) were adjudicated to be permanent, and 42% (253) died with the filter in place. The remaining 3% (19) comprised patients alive with the filter not yet retrieved at study endpoint, 42% (8/19) of which were placed in 2023. Of this cohort, 8 still needed the filter and were being monitored to determine follow-up timing, 2 needed a follow-up appointment, and 9 were lost to follow-up due to repeated no-shows and/or inability to reach the patient despite multiple attempts. Overall, 1.5% (9/607) of all filters placed were not accounted for.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates high accountability (98.5%) of retrievable IVC filters when using a prospective registry actively managed by an IR PA, providing an effective and feasible model for facilitating appropriate follow-up.