经脐与经腹壁套管针口胆囊取出术套管针部位疝的发生率较高:一项腹腔镜胆囊切除术的多中心回顾性分析。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Eduard A van Bodegraven, Paulieke C Oosterwijk, Sanne M van Aalten, Boudewijn E Schaafsma, Robert M Smeenk
{"title":"经脐与经腹壁套管针口胆囊取出术套管针部位疝的发生率较高:一项腹腔镜胆囊切除术的多中心回顾性分析。","authors":"Eduard A van Bodegraven, Paulieke C Oosterwijk, Sanne M van Aalten, Boudewijn E Schaafsma, Robert M Smeenk","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03721-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trocar site hernia (TSH) is a known complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Gallbladder extraction is typically performed through the umbilical or epigastric trocar port. However, data on the incidence of TSH in relation to the extraction site is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the need for surgical repair of TSH following gallbladder extraction through the umbilical versus epigastric trocar port.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted across two Dutch general hospitals. It assessed the occurrence of TSH after LC and examined commonly described risk factors in relation to the TSH location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 377 patients that underwent LC, the extraction site of the gallbladder was known in 1756 patients. Gallbladder extraction was performed via the umbilical trocar port in 929 (53%) of cases and via the epigastric trocar port in 827 (47%) of cases. TSH repair was required in 36 (2.1%) patients, with a higher incidence in patients with gallbladder extraction through the umbilical trocar port (3.2%) compared to the epigastric trocar port (0.7%), (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The need for operative repair of a TSH after a LC is significantly reduced when the gallbladder is retrieved through the epigastric trocar site port compared to the umbilical trocar site port.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Higher incidence of trocar site hernia with gallbladder extraction via umbilical versus epigastric trocar port: a multicentre retrospective analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Eduard A van Bodegraven, Paulieke C Oosterwijk, Sanne M van Aalten, Boudewijn E Schaafsma, Robert M Smeenk\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03721-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trocar site hernia (TSH) is a known complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Gallbladder extraction is typically performed through the umbilical or epigastric trocar port. However, data on the incidence of TSH in relation to the extraction site is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the need for surgical repair of TSH following gallbladder extraction through the umbilical versus epigastric trocar port.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted across two Dutch general hospitals. It assessed the occurrence of TSH after LC and examined commonly described risk factors in relation to the TSH location.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2 377 patients that underwent LC, the extraction site of the gallbladder was known in 1756 patients. Gallbladder extraction was performed via the umbilical trocar port in 929 (53%) of cases and via the epigastric trocar port in 827 (47%) of cases. TSH repair was required in 36 (2.1%) patients, with a higher incidence in patients with gallbladder extraction through the umbilical trocar port (3.2%) compared to the epigastric trocar port (0.7%), (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The need for operative repair of a TSH after a LC is significantly reduced when the gallbladder is retrieved through the epigastric trocar site port compared to the umbilical trocar site port.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062153/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03721-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03721-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:套管针部位疝(TSH)是腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的一种已知并发症。胆囊取出通常通过脐或上腹部套管针口进行。然而,有关提取部位的TSH发病率的数据是有限的。本研究的目的是评估通过脐部和上腹部套管针口胆囊取出后手术修复TSH的必要性。方法:回顾性队列研究在两家荷兰综合医院进行。它评估了LC后TSH的发生,并检查了与TSH位置相关的常见危险因素。结果:在2 377例行LC的患者中,有1756例患者知道胆囊的取出部位。929例(53%)经脐套管针取胆囊,827例(47%)经上腹部套管针取胆囊。36例(2.1%)患者需要TSH修复,其中经脐套管针取胆囊的患者(3.2%)比经脐套管针取胆囊的患者(0.7%)发生率更高。(p)结论:经脐套管针取胆囊比经脐套管针取胆囊明显降低了LC术后TSH的手术修复需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Higher incidence of trocar site hernia with gallbladder extraction via umbilical versus epigastric trocar port: a multicentre retrospective analysis of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Background: Trocar site hernia (TSH) is a known complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Gallbladder extraction is typically performed through the umbilical or epigastric trocar port. However, data on the incidence of TSH in relation to the extraction site is limited. This study aimed to evaluate the need for surgical repair of TSH following gallbladder extraction through the umbilical versus epigastric trocar port.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted across two Dutch general hospitals. It assessed the occurrence of TSH after LC and examined commonly described risk factors in relation to the TSH location.

Results: Among 2 377 patients that underwent LC, the extraction site of the gallbladder was known in 1756 patients. Gallbladder extraction was performed via the umbilical trocar port in 929 (53%) of cases and via the epigastric trocar port in 827 (47%) of cases. TSH repair was required in 36 (2.1%) patients, with a higher incidence in patients with gallbladder extraction through the umbilical trocar port (3.2%) compared to the epigastric trocar port (0.7%), (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The need for operative repair of a TSH after a LC is significantly reduced when the gallbladder is retrieved through the epigastric trocar site port compared to the umbilical trocar site port.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
342
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信