北美蛇咬伤登记(NASBR)中抗蛇毒血清类型和地理位置的急性超敏反应分析。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Timlin Glaser, Rachel Culbreth, Erica L Liebelt, Anne-Michelle Ruha, Spencer Greene, Sharan Campleman, Meghan B Spyres
{"title":"北美蛇咬伤登记(NASBR)中抗蛇毒血清类型和地理位置的急性超敏反应分析。","authors":"Timlin Glaser, Rachel Culbreth, Erica L Liebelt, Anne-Michelle Ruha, Spencer Greene, Sharan Campleman, Meghan B Spyres","doi":"10.1007/s13181-025-01078-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs) to the snakebite antivenoms Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (ovine) (Fab) and Crotalidae Immune F(ab')<sub>2</sub> (equine) (Fab2) supports no differences. However, larger studies may not account for geographic differences. Recent data suggest a correlation with alpha-gal syndrome (AGS). This study investigates the incidence of AHRs in patients receiving Fab2, Fab, or both, with a focus on U.S. states with higher AGS prevalence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an analysis of native pit viper envenomations reported to the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR) between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Patients administered Fab2 or Fab on index hospitalization were included. High-AGS and low-AGS regions were defined according to epidemiologic data. The primary outcome was incidence of AHRs after administration of antivenom overall and in high-AGS vs. low-AGS states. Bivariate statistical tests and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for proportions were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1051 patients were identified. Fab2 was administered in 439 cases, and Fab was administered in 722 cases for a total of 1161 cases. Fifty AHRs were analyzed. AHRs were more common with Fab2 (6.6%; 95% CI: 4.6%, 9.3%) compared to Fab (2.9%; 95% CI: 1.9%, 4.4%) in the overall NASBR population (p = 0.004). In low-AGS states, there were 25/421 (5.9%; 95% CI: 4.1%, 8.6%) Fab2 AHRs vs. 16/569 (2.8%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 4.5%) Fab AHRs (p = 0.02). In high-AGS states, the Fab2 group had 4/18 (22.2%; 95% CI: 9.0%, 45.2%) AHRs vs. 5/153 (3.3%; 95% CI: 1.4%, 7.4%) in the Fab group (p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this ToxIC NASBR study, administration of Fab2 was associated with a higher incidence of AHRs compared to Fab. The difference was especially notable in states with a higher prevalence of AGS.</p>","PeriodicalId":16429,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Acute Hypersensitivity Reactions by Antivenom Type and Geographic Location in the North American Snake Bite Registry (NASBR).\",\"authors\":\"Timlin Glaser, Rachel Culbreth, Erica L Liebelt, Anne-Michelle Ruha, Spencer Greene, Sharan Campleman, Meghan B Spyres\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13181-025-01078-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs) to the snakebite antivenoms Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (ovine) (Fab) and Crotalidae Immune F(ab')<sub>2</sub> (equine) (Fab2) supports no differences. However, larger studies may not account for geographic differences. Recent data suggest a correlation with alpha-gal syndrome (AGS). This study investigates the incidence of AHRs in patients receiving Fab2, Fab, or both, with a focus on U.S. states with higher AGS prevalence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an analysis of native pit viper envenomations reported to the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR) between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Patients administered Fab2 or Fab on index hospitalization were included. High-AGS and low-AGS regions were defined according to epidemiologic data. The primary outcome was incidence of AHRs after administration of antivenom overall and in high-AGS vs. low-AGS states. Bivariate statistical tests and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for proportions were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1051 patients were identified. Fab2 was administered in 439 cases, and Fab was administered in 722 cases for a total of 1161 cases. Fifty AHRs were analyzed. AHRs were more common with Fab2 (6.6%; 95% CI: 4.6%, 9.3%) compared to Fab (2.9%; 95% CI: 1.9%, 4.4%) in the overall NASBR population (p = 0.004). In low-AGS states, there were 25/421 (5.9%; 95% CI: 4.1%, 8.6%) Fab2 AHRs vs. 16/569 (2.8%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 4.5%) Fab AHRs (p = 0.02). In high-AGS states, the Fab2 group had 4/18 (22.2%; 95% CI: 9.0%, 45.2%) AHRs vs. 5/153 (3.3%; 95% CI: 1.4%, 7.4%) in the Fab group (p = 0.008).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this ToxIC NASBR study, administration of Fab2 was associated with a higher incidence of AHRs compared to Fab. The difference was especially notable in states with a higher prevalence of AGS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01078-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-025-01078-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于蛇咬抗蛇毒血清Crotalidae多价免疫Fab(羊)(Fab)和Crotalidae免疫F(ab')2(马)(Fab2)的急性超敏反应(AHRs)的证据支持没有差异。然而,更大规模的研究可能无法解释地理差异。最近的数据表明与α -半乳糖综合征(AGS)相关。本研究调查了接受Fab2、Fab或两者同时接受的患者ahr的发生率,重点关注美国AGS患病率较高的州。方法:对2018年1月1日至2023年12月31日期间向毒理学调查联盟(ToxIC)北美蛇咬伤登记处(NASBR)报告的本地蝮蛇中毒进行分析。纳入指数住院时给予Fab2或Fab的患者。根据流行病学资料确定高ags区和低ags区。主要结局是抗蛇毒血清总体用药后以及高ags与低ags状态下ahr的发生率。计算双变量统计检验和比例的95%置信区间(CI)。结果:共发现1051例患者。439例使用Fab2, 722例使用Fab,共1161例。分析了50例ahr。ahr在Fab2患者中更为常见(6.6%;95% CI: 4.6%, 9.3%),而Fab组(2.9%;95% CI: 1.9%, 4.4%) (p = 0.004)。在低ags州,有25/421例(5.9%;95% CI: 4.1%, 8.6%) Fab2 AHRs vs. 16/569 (2.8%;95% CI: 1.7%, 4.5%) Fab ahr (p = 0.02)。在高ags状态下,Fab2组有4/18 (22.2%);95% CI: 9.0%, 45.2%) ahr vs. 5/153 (3.3%;95% CI: 1.4%, 7.4%) (p = 0.008)。结论:在这项毒性NASBR研究中,与Fab相比,给药Fab2与更高的ahr发生率相关。这种差异在AGS患病率较高的州尤为显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Acute Hypersensitivity Reactions by Antivenom Type and Geographic Location in the North American Snake Bite Registry (NASBR).

Background: Evidence regarding acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs) to the snakebite antivenoms Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab (ovine) (Fab) and Crotalidae Immune F(ab')2 (equine) (Fab2) supports no differences. However, larger studies may not account for geographic differences. Recent data suggest a correlation with alpha-gal syndrome (AGS). This study investigates the incidence of AHRs in patients receiving Fab2, Fab, or both, with a focus on U.S. states with higher AGS prevalence.

Methods: This is an analysis of native pit viper envenomations reported to the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC) North American Snakebite Registry (NASBR) between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2023. Patients administered Fab2 or Fab on index hospitalization were included. High-AGS and low-AGS regions were defined according to epidemiologic data. The primary outcome was incidence of AHRs after administration of antivenom overall and in high-AGS vs. low-AGS states. Bivariate statistical tests and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for proportions were computed.

Results: A total of 1051 patients were identified. Fab2 was administered in 439 cases, and Fab was administered in 722 cases for a total of 1161 cases. Fifty AHRs were analyzed. AHRs were more common with Fab2 (6.6%; 95% CI: 4.6%, 9.3%) compared to Fab (2.9%; 95% CI: 1.9%, 4.4%) in the overall NASBR population (p = 0.004). In low-AGS states, there were 25/421 (5.9%; 95% CI: 4.1%, 8.6%) Fab2 AHRs vs. 16/569 (2.8%; 95% CI: 1.7%, 4.5%) Fab AHRs (p = 0.02). In high-AGS states, the Fab2 group had 4/18 (22.2%; 95% CI: 9.0%, 45.2%) AHRs vs. 5/153 (3.3%; 95% CI: 1.4%, 7.4%) in the Fab group (p = 0.008).

Conclusion: In this ToxIC NASBR study, administration of Fab2 was associated with a higher incidence of AHRs compared to Fab. The difference was especially notable in states with a higher prevalence of AGS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Toxicology (JMT) is a peer-reviewed medical journal dedicated to advances in clinical toxicology, focusing on the diagnosis, management, and prevention of poisoning and other adverse health effects resulting from medications, chemicals, occupational and environmental substances, and biological hazards. As the official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology (ACMT), JMT is managed by an editorial board of clinicians as well as scientists and thus publishes research that is relevant to medical toxicologists, emergency physicians, critical care specialists, pediatricians, pre-hospital providers, occupational physicians, substance abuse experts, veterinary toxicologists, and policy makers.       JMT articles generate considerable interest in the lay media, with 2016 JMT articles cited by various social media sites, the Boston Globe, and the Washington Post among others.     For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.    For questions or comments about the journal, please contact jmtinfo@acmt.net.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信