成人胫骨骨折的治疗和临床结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedics Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.3928/01477447-20250415-01
Harmon S Khela, Monty S Khela, Jonathan Jose, Rashad Madi, John D Kelly, Liane Miller
{"title":"成人胫骨骨折的治疗和临床结果:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Harmon S Khela, Monty S Khela, Jonathan Jose, Rashad Madi, John D Kelly, Liane Miller","doi":"10.3928/01477447-20250415-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult tibial spine fractures (TSFs) are rare but can cause significant morbidity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review identified studies on adult TSFs. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, outcomes, and complications were analyzed using descriptive statistics and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies (691 cases) were included. Most fractures were type III, treated arthroscopically with sutures or screws. Fracture type showed no significant differences in outcomes. Suture fixation yielded better functional scores and fewer complications than screws.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No definitive advantage was observed for either fracture type or fixation method. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatments. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(3):174-187.].</p>","PeriodicalId":19631,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedics","volume":"48 3","pages":"174-187"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Tibial Spine Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Harmon S Khela, Monty S Khela, Jonathan Jose, Rashad Madi, John D Kelly, Liane Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01477447-20250415-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adult tibial spine fractures (TSFs) are rare but can cause significant morbidity.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review identified studies on adult TSFs. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, outcomes, and complications were analyzed using descriptive statistics and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies (691 cases) were included. Most fractures were type III, treated arthroscopically with sutures or screws. Fracture type showed no significant differences in outcomes. Suture fixation yielded better functional scores and fewer complications than screws.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No definitive advantage was observed for either fracture type or fixation method. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatments. [<i>Orthopedics</i>. 2025;48(3):174-187.].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"48 3\",\"pages\":\"174-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20250415-01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20250415-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:成人胫骨骨折(TSFs)是罕见的,但可引起显著的发病率。材料和方法:系统回顾了成人tsf的研究。采用描述性统计和荟萃分析对患者人口统计学、骨折特征、手术细节、结局和并发症进行分析。结果:纳入28项研究(691例)。大多数骨折为III型,采用关节镜下缝合或螺钉治疗。骨折类型无明显差异。与螺钉相比,缝合固定具有更好的功能评分和更少的并发症。结论:骨折类型和固定方法均无明确优势。需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的治疗方法。[矫形手术。48 2025;(3): 174 - 187。]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment and Clinical Outcomes of Tibial Spine Fractures in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Adult tibial spine fractures (TSFs) are rare but can cause significant morbidity.

Materials and methods: A systematic review identified studies on adult TSFs. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, outcomes, and complications were analyzed using descriptive statistics and meta-analysis.

Results: Twenty-eight studies (691 cases) were included. Most fractures were type III, treated arthroscopically with sutures or screws. Fracture type showed no significant differences in outcomes. Suture fixation yielded better functional scores and fewer complications than screws.

Conclusion: No definitive advantage was observed for either fracture type or fixation method. Further research is needed to establish optimal treatments. [Orthopedics. 2025;48(3):174-187.].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedics
Orthopedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 40 years, Orthopedics, a bimonthly peer-reviewed journal, has been the preferred choice of orthopedic surgeons for clinically relevant information on all aspects of adult and pediatric orthopedic surgery and treatment. Edited by Robert D''Ambrosia, MD, Chairman of the Department of Orthopedics at the University of Colorado, Denver, and former President of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, as well as an Editorial Board of over 100 international orthopedists, Orthopedics is the source to turn to for guidance in your practice. The journal offers access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content. Highlights also include Blue Ribbon articles published full text in print and online, as well as Tips & Techniques posted with every issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信