综合药物评价对2型糖尿病医疗保险受益人的影响。

Tsung-Hua Shen, Felix Cheuk Wun Ting, Shaquib Al Hasan, Joel F Farley
{"title":"综合药物评价对2型糖尿病医疗保险受益人的影响。","authors":"Tsung-Hua Shen, Felix Cheuk Wun Ting, Shaquib Al Hasan, Joel F Farley","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management, particularly adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD), is a key focus of the Part D Medicare Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program. Despite potential benefits, evidence on the effectiveness of MTM, specifically Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMRs), remains mixed. To evaluate the effectiveness of CMRs on patient outcomes, we conducted the largest CMR evaluation to date among Medicare beneficiaries with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study using Medicare claims and MTM data from 2013 to 2019 to examine the impact of CMR on OAD adherence as measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC), statin utilization, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalization. A difference-in-difference (DiD) approach with inverse probability treatment weighting was used to reduce confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although CMR recipients and nonrecipients both experienced a reduction in PDC during the follow-up, CMR recipients experienced 2.4% (95% CI, 1.9%-2.9%) less of a decline than nonrecipients, and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.8%) fewer CMR recipients were considered non-adherent after CMR delivery. The proportion of CMR recipients using statin increased 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.2%) relative to nonrecipients after CMR delivery. The proportion of CMR recipients who experienced an ED visit declined by 0.3% (95% CI, -0.6% to 1.2%) while the proportion of hospitalization increased 1.9% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.8%) following CMR delivery, relative to nonrecipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with T2DM receiving a CMR experienced improved OAD adherence and statin utilization compared to nonrecipients. Our results demonstrate the potential benefits of collaborating with pharmacists to improve diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Comprehensive Medication Reviews on Medicare Beneficiaries With Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Tsung-Hua Shen, Felix Cheuk Wun Ting, Shaquib Al Hasan, Joel F Farley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19463\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management, particularly adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD), is a key focus of the Part D Medicare Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program. Despite potential benefits, evidence on the effectiveness of MTM, specifically Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMRs), remains mixed. To evaluate the effectiveness of CMRs on patient outcomes, we conducted the largest CMR evaluation to date among Medicare beneficiaries with T2DM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study using Medicare claims and MTM data from 2013 to 2019 to examine the impact of CMR on OAD adherence as measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC), statin utilization, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalization. A difference-in-difference (DiD) approach with inverse probability treatment weighting was used to reduce confounding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although CMR recipients and nonrecipients both experienced a reduction in PDC during the follow-up, CMR recipients experienced 2.4% (95% CI, 1.9%-2.9%) less of a decline than nonrecipients, and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.8%) fewer CMR recipients were considered non-adherent after CMR delivery. The proportion of CMR recipients using statin increased 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.2%) relative to nonrecipients after CMR delivery. The proportion of CMR recipients who experienced an ED visit declined by 0.3% (95% CI, -0.6% to 1.2%) while the proportion of hospitalization increased 1.9% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.8%) following CMR delivery, relative to nonrecipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with T2DM receiving a CMR experienced improved OAD adherence and statin utilization compared to nonrecipients. Our results demonstrate the potential benefits of collaborating with pharmacists to improve diabetes care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94112,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19463\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2型糖尿病(T2DM)的管理,特别是口服降糖药(OAD)的依从性,是D部分医疗保险药物治疗管理(MTM)项目的重点。尽管有潜在的益处,但关于MTM有效性的证据,特别是综合药物评价(Comprehensive Medication Reviews,简称CMRs),仍然参差不齐。为了评估CMR对患者预后的有效性,我们对患有T2DM的医疗保险受益人进行了迄今为止最大规模的CMR评估。方法:我们利用2013年至2019年的医疗保险索赔和MTM数据进行了一项回顾性观察性研究,通过覆盖天数(PDC)比例、他汀类药物使用、急诊(ED)就诊和住院来研究CMR对OAD依从性的影响。采用逆概率处理加权的差中差(DiD)方法来减少混淆。结果:尽管CMR受者和非受者在随访期间都经历了PDC的减少,但CMR受者比非受者经历了2.4% (95% CI, 1.9%-2.9%)的下降,并且在CMR递送后被认为非粘附的CMR受者减少了2.0% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.8%)。在CMR交付后,CMR接受者使用他汀类药物的比例相对于非接受者增加1.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.2%)。与未接受CMR的患者相比,接受CMR的患者就诊的比例下降了0.3% (95% CI, -0.6% - 1.2%),而在CMR分娩后住院的比例增加了1.9% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.8%)。结论:与未接受CMR的T2DM患者相比,接受CMR的患者OAD依从性和他汀类药物使用率有所改善。我们的研究结果证明了与药剂师合作改善糖尿病护理的潜在好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Comprehensive Medication Reviews on Medicare Beneficiaries With Type 2 Diabetes.

Background: Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management, particularly adherence to oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD), is a key focus of the Part D Medicare Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program. Despite potential benefits, evidence on the effectiveness of MTM, specifically Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMRs), remains mixed. To evaluate the effectiveness of CMRs on patient outcomes, we conducted the largest CMR evaluation to date among Medicare beneficiaries with T2DM.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study using Medicare claims and MTM data from 2013 to 2019 to examine the impact of CMR on OAD adherence as measured by the proportion of days covered (PDC), statin utilization, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospitalization. A difference-in-difference (DiD) approach with inverse probability treatment weighting was used to reduce confounding.

Results: Although CMR recipients and nonrecipients both experienced a reduction in PDC during the follow-up, CMR recipients experienced 2.4% (95% CI, 1.9%-2.9%) less of a decline than nonrecipients, and 2.0% (95% CI, 1.2%-2.8%) fewer CMR recipients were considered non-adherent after CMR delivery. The proportion of CMR recipients using statin increased 1.4% (95% CI, 0.7%-2.2%) relative to nonrecipients after CMR delivery. The proportion of CMR recipients who experienced an ED visit declined by 0.3% (95% CI, -0.6% to 1.2%) while the proportion of hospitalization increased 1.9% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.8%) following CMR delivery, relative to nonrecipients.

Conclusion: Patients with T2DM receiving a CMR experienced improved OAD adherence and statin utilization compared to nonrecipients. Our results demonstrate the potential benefits of collaborating with pharmacists to improve diabetes care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信