根据专职保健专业人员的说法,使用直接通道存在障碍;荷兰物理治疗师、营养师和健康保险公司之间的一项探索。

IF 2.6 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Laura J Damen, Britt Beerman, W M Meijer, B J Knottnerus, J D De Jong, L H D Van Tuyl
{"title":"根据专职保健专业人员的说法,使用直接通道存在障碍;荷兰物理治疗师、营养师和健康保险公司之间的一项探索。","authors":"Laura J Damen, Britt Beerman, W M Meijer, B J Knottnerus, J D De Jong, L H D Van Tuyl","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02816-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>General practices experience high workloads and increasing volume of patients. But not all patients require GP care. We previously reported that GPs observed that allied health professionals frequently request referrals even when patients initially seek direct access to care. This study, therefore, explored the barriers to the use of direct access as identified by allied health professionals and health insurers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen in-depth interviews were conducted comprising six dietitians, seven physiotherapists, and four health insurers. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using the qualitative research principles of thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main key themes that derived from the interviews included: (1) policy, (2) motivation, and (3) public profile, which were further subdivided into sub-themes. While health insurers claimed to not impose any specific requirements for the use of direct access, allied health professionals faced several policy-related challenges with direct access. For instance, dietitians reported reduced treatment time under direct access and claimed lower reimbursement for intake appointments compared to those following referrals-an assertion denied by insurers. Other reasons for not using direct access include greater uncertainty about potentially overlooking health issues during the initial intake. Additionally, some physiotherapists and dietitians perceive direct access as less convenient than obtaining a referral, for example as it involves fewer regulations from health insurers and therefore saves time. Public profile also played a role in the use of direct access. Dietitians noted limited patient awareness of their services and the availability of direct access, unlike physiotherapists, who benefited from public campaigns and effective management strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the small sample size, this study showed a gap between the perspectives of allied health professionals and the health insurers that need to be further explored. Direct access has inadvertently increased the workload for some allied health professionals, particularly dietitians. This is an unintended outcome of a system intended, ironically, to reduce pressure on care. The use of direct access could be improved by carrying out further investigations and addressing the challenges faced by allied health professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"127"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to the use of direct access according to allied health professionals; an exploration among Dutch physiotherapists, dietitians, and health insurers.\",\"authors\":\"Laura J Damen, Britt Beerman, W M Meijer, B J Knottnerus, J D De Jong, L H D Van Tuyl\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-025-02816-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>General practices experience high workloads and increasing volume of patients. But not all patients require GP care. We previously reported that GPs observed that allied health professionals frequently request referrals even when patients initially seek direct access to care. This study, therefore, explored the barriers to the use of direct access as identified by allied health professionals and health insurers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen in-depth interviews were conducted comprising six dietitians, seven physiotherapists, and four health insurers. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using the qualitative research principles of thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The main key themes that derived from the interviews included: (1) policy, (2) motivation, and (3) public profile, which were further subdivided into sub-themes. While health insurers claimed to not impose any specific requirements for the use of direct access, allied health professionals faced several policy-related challenges with direct access. For instance, dietitians reported reduced treatment time under direct access and claimed lower reimbursement for intake appointments compared to those following referrals-an assertion denied by insurers. Other reasons for not using direct access include greater uncertainty about potentially overlooking health issues during the initial intake. Additionally, some physiotherapists and dietitians perceive direct access as less convenient than obtaining a referral, for example as it involves fewer regulations from health insurers and therefore saves time. Public profile also played a role in the use of direct access. Dietitians noted limited patient awareness of their services and the availability of direct access, unlike physiotherapists, who benefited from public campaigns and effective management strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the small sample size, this study showed a gap between the perspectives of allied health professionals and the health insurers that need to be further explored. Direct access has inadvertently increased the workload for some allied health professionals, particularly dietitians. This is an unintended outcome of a system intended, ironically, to reduce pressure on care. The use of direct access could be improved by carrying out further investigations and addressing the challenges faced by allied health professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12032724/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02816-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02816-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:全科医生工作量大,病人数量增加。但并非所有患者都需要全科医生护理。我们以前报道过,全科医生观察到,即使患者最初寻求直接获得护理,联合卫生专业人员也经常要求转诊。因此,本研究探讨了联合卫生专业人员和健康保险公司确定的使用直接访问的障碍。方法:对6名营养师、7名物理治疗师和4名健康保险人员进行了17次深度访谈。访谈被记录、转录,并使用专题分析的定性研究原则进行分析。结果:访谈得出的主要关键主题包括:(1)政策,(2)动机,(3)公众形象,并进一步细分为子主题。虽然健康保险公司声称没有对直接访问的使用施加任何具体要求,但专职保健专业人员在直接访问方面面临一些与政策有关的挑战。例如,营养师报告说,与转诊相比,直接就诊减少了治疗时间,并声称入院预约的报销更低——保险公司否认了这一说法。不使用直接通道的其他原因包括更大的不确定性,即在初始摄入期间可能忽视健康问题。此外,一些物理治疗师和营养师认为,直接就诊不如转诊方便,因为它涉及的健康保险公司的规定较少,因此节省了时间。公众形象也在使用直接访问方面发挥了作用。营养师注意到病人对他们的服务的认识有限,也不像物理治疗师那样可以直接获得服务,而物理治疗师则受益于公众活动和有效的管理策略。结论:尽管样本量小,但本研究显示专职卫生专业人员和健康保险公司之间的观点存在差距,需要进一步探讨。直接访问无意中增加了一些专职卫生专业人员,特别是营养师的工作量。具有讽刺意味的是,这是一个旨在减少护理压力的系统的意外结果。通过开展进一步调查和解决专职保健专业人员面临的挑战,可以改善直接就诊的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Barriers to the use of direct access according to allied health professionals; an exploration among Dutch physiotherapists, dietitians, and health insurers.

Introduction: General practices experience high workloads and increasing volume of patients. But not all patients require GP care. We previously reported that GPs observed that allied health professionals frequently request referrals even when patients initially seek direct access to care. This study, therefore, explored the barriers to the use of direct access as identified by allied health professionals and health insurers.

Methods: Seventeen in-depth interviews were conducted comprising six dietitians, seven physiotherapists, and four health insurers. The interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analysed using the qualitative research principles of thematic analysis.

Results: The main key themes that derived from the interviews included: (1) policy, (2) motivation, and (3) public profile, which were further subdivided into sub-themes. While health insurers claimed to not impose any specific requirements for the use of direct access, allied health professionals faced several policy-related challenges with direct access. For instance, dietitians reported reduced treatment time under direct access and claimed lower reimbursement for intake appointments compared to those following referrals-an assertion denied by insurers. Other reasons for not using direct access include greater uncertainty about potentially overlooking health issues during the initial intake. Additionally, some physiotherapists and dietitians perceive direct access as less convenient than obtaining a referral, for example as it involves fewer regulations from health insurers and therefore saves time. Public profile also played a role in the use of direct access. Dietitians noted limited patient awareness of their services and the availability of direct access, unlike physiotherapists, who benefited from public campaigns and effective management strategies.

Conclusions: Despite the small sample size, this study showed a gap between the perspectives of allied health professionals and the health insurers that need to be further explored. Direct access has inadvertently increased the workload for some allied health professionals, particularly dietitians. This is an unintended outcome of a system intended, ironically, to reduce pressure on care. The use of direct access could be improved by carrying out further investigations and addressing the challenges faced by allied health professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信