氯胺酮与电惊厥治疗抑郁症:临床医生指南。

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1176/appi.focus.20240040
Sophie I Elliott, Rachel B Katz, Robert B Ostroff, Mina Ansari, Sophie E Holmes, Gerard Sanacora
{"title":"氯胺酮与电惊厥治疗抑郁症:临床医生指南。","authors":"Sophie I Elliott, Rachel B Katz, Robert B Ostroff, Mina Ansari, Sophie E Holmes, Gerard Sanacora","doi":"10.1176/appi.focus.20240040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effective treatment of major depressive disorder remains one of the biggest public health challenges globally. For moderate to severe cases, pharmacotherapy often falls short, leading to treatment-resistant depression. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has generally been considered the gold standard for severe cases of treatment-resistant depression. However, emerging evidence suggests that ketamine may serve as a promising alternative. Two relatively large noninferiority trials and three meta-analyses support the efficacy of both treatments but report contradictory findings regarding superiority. The authors discuss possible reasons underlying these discrepant findings, including variations in patient selection criteria, study outcome measures, treatment delivery, and site experience. Additionally, the authors examine the unique risk and benefit profiles of each treatment, highlighting patient-specific considerations. By evaluating the most recent evidence for the efficacy of ketamine versus ECT alongside key patient-specific factors, the authors aimed to guide clinicians in recommending the optimal treatment choice for each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":73036,"journal":{"name":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","volume":"23 2","pages":"195-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995899/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ketamine Versus Electroconvulsive Therapy for the Treatment of Depression: A Guide for Clinicians.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie I Elliott, Rachel B Katz, Robert B Ostroff, Mina Ansari, Sophie E Holmes, Gerard Sanacora\",\"doi\":\"10.1176/appi.focus.20240040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effective treatment of major depressive disorder remains one of the biggest public health challenges globally. For moderate to severe cases, pharmacotherapy often falls short, leading to treatment-resistant depression. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has generally been considered the gold standard for severe cases of treatment-resistant depression. However, emerging evidence suggests that ketamine may serve as a promising alternative. Two relatively large noninferiority trials and three meta-analyses support the efficacy of both treatments but report contradictory findings regarding superiority. The authors discuss possible reasons underlying these discrepant findings, including variations in patient selection criteria, study outcome measures, treatment delivery, and site experience. Additionally, the authors examine the unique risk and benefit profiles of each treatment, highlighting patient-specific considerations. By evaluating the most recent evidence for the efficacy of ketamine versus ECT alongside key patient-specific factors, the authors aimed to guide clinicians in recommending the optimal treatment choice for each patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)\",\"volume\":\"23 2\",\"pages\":\"195-205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995899/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20240040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20240040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

严重抑郁症的有效治疗仍然是全球最大的公共卫生挑战之一。对于中度至重度病例,药物治疗往往效果不佳,从而导致难治性抑郁症。电休克疗法(ECT)通常被认为是治疗严重难治性抑郁症的金标准。然而,新出现的证据表明氯胺酮可能是一种有希望的替代品。两个相对较大的非劣效性试验和三个荟萃分析支持两种治疗的疗效,但报告了关于优势的矛盾结果。作者讨论了这些差异发现的可能原因,包括患者选择标准、研究结果测量、治疗交付和现场经验的变化。此外,作者检查了每种治疗的独特风险和益处概况,强调了患者的具体考虑。通过评估氯胺酮与ECT疗效的最新证据以及关键的患者特异性因素,作者旨在指导临床医生为每位患者推荐最佳治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ketamine Versus Electroconvulsive Therapy for the Treatment of Depression: A Guide for Clinicians.

The effective treatment of major depressive disorder remains one of the biggest public health challenges globally. For moderate to severe cases, pharmacotherapy often falls short, leading to treatment-resistant depression. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has generally been considered the gold standard for severe cases of treatment-resistant depression. However, emerging evidence suggests that ketamine may serve as a promising alternative. Two relatively large noninferiority trials and three meta-analyses support the efficacy of both treatments but report contradictory findings regarding superiority. The authors discuss possible reasons underlying these discrepant findings, including variations in patient selection criteria, study outcome measures, treatment delivery, and site experience. Additionally, the authors examine the unique risk and benefit profiles of each treatment, highlighting patient-specific considerations. By evaluating the most recent evidence for the efficacy of ketamine versus ECT alongside key patient-specific factors, the authors aimed to guide clinicians in recommending the optimal treatment choice for each patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信