这可能不是最明智的做法,但有时这是唯一的选择:一项关于青少年优秀运动员使用止痛药的纵向混合方法研究。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Julie Rønne Pedersen, Louise Kamuk Storm, Anders Christer Larsen, Merete Møller, Bart Koes, Afsaneh Mohammednejad, Jonas Bloch Thorlund
{"title":"这可能不是最明智的做法,但有时这是唯一的选择:一项关于青少年优秀运动员使用止痛药的纵向混合方法研究。","authors":"Julie Rønne Pedersen, Louise Kamuk Storm, Anders Christer Larsen, Merete Møller, Bart Koes, Afsaneh Mohammednejad, Jonas Bloch Thorlund","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2025.13015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To (1) compare analgesic use over 36 weeks between endurance athletes, technical athletes, and team athletes, and (2) explore experiences and sociocultural factors impacting analgesic use. <b>DESIGN:</b> Longitudinal mixed-methods study <b>METHODS:</b> Six hundred eighty-nine youth elite athletes (44% girls/women, 15-20 years) provided weekly reports on number of days with analgesic use, reasons for use, and types of analgesics used for 36 weeks. Prevalence and frequency of analgesic use was compared between athletes from team sports, endurance sports, and technical sports using mixed-effects logistic and Poisson regression models. Reasons and types of analgesics used were compared between groups using Chi-square tests. Nine focus group interviews with 32 participants were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. <b>RESULTS:</b> There were no differences in odds of analgesic use between endurance athletes (reference group), technical athletes (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 1.37), and team athletes (OR, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.25). Similarly, there were no differences in rate of analgesic use between endurance athletes (reference group), technical athletes (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.97; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.07), or team athletes (IRR, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.14). Reasons for use varied between groups, while the types of analgesics used were similar. Sociocultural factors impacting analgesic use included considering the potential consequences of using analgesics for pain and injury, and feeling responsible for team performance. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Analgesics were commonly used among youth elite athletes in Denmark. Analgesic use generally did not vary between team athletes, endurance athletes, and technical athletes. Several norms, values, and structures in sports environments impacted analgesic use. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(5):1-11. Epub 3 April 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13015</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":"55 5","pages":"366-376"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>It May Not Be the Smartest Thing to Do, but Sometimes It's the Only Option:</i> A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study of Analgesic Use in Youth Elite Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Julie Rønne Pedersen, Louise Kamuk Storm, Anders Christer Larsen, Merete Møller, Bart Koes, Afsaneh Mohammednejad, Jonas Bloch Thorlund\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2025.13015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To (1) compare analgesic use over 36 weeks between endurance athletes, technical athletes, and team athletes, and (2) explore experiences and sociocultural factors impacting analgesic use. <b>DESIGN:</b> Longitudinal mixed-methods study <b>METHODS:</b> Six hundred eighty-nine youth elite athletes (44% girls/women, 15-20 years) provided weekly reports on number of days with analgesic use, reasons for use, and types of analgesics used for 36 weeks. Prevalence and frequency of analgesic use was compared between athletes from team sports, endurance sports, and technical sports using mixed-effects logistic and Poisson regression models. Reasons and types of analgesics used were compared between groups using Chi-square tests. Nine focus group interviews with 32 participants were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. <b>RESULTS:</b> There were no differences in odds of analgesic use between endurance athletes (reference group), technical athletes (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 1.37), and team athletes (OR, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.25). Similarly, there were no differences in rate of analgesic use between endurance athletes (reference group), technical athletes (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.97; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.07), or team athletes (IRR, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.14). Reasons for use varied between groups, while the types of analgesics used were similar. Sociocultural factors impacting analgesic use included considering the potential consequences of using analgesics for pain and injury, and feeling responsible for team performance. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Analgesics were commonly used among youth elite athletes in Denmark. Analgesic use generally did not vary between team athletes, endurance athletes, and technical athletes. Several norms, values, and structures in sports environments impacted analgesic use. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(5):1-11. Epub 3 April 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13015</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\"55 5\",\"pages\":\"366-376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13015\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2025.13015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:(1)比较耐力运动员、技术运动员和团队运动员在36周内使用镇痛药的情况;(2)探索影响镇痛药使用的经验和社会文化因素。设计:纵向混合方法研究方法:689名青年优秀运动员(44%为女孩/女性,15-20岁)每周提供36周内使用镇痛药的天数、使用原因和镇痛药类型的报告。使用混合效应logistic和泊松回归模型比较了团队项目、耐力项目和技术项目运动员使用镇痛药的患病率和频率。使用镇痛药的原因和种类采用卡方检验进行组间比较。对32名参与者进行了9次焦点小组访谈,并采用主题分析法进行了分析。结果:耐力运动员(参照组)和技术运动员使用镇痛药的几率无差异(优势比[OR], 0.94;95%可信区间[CI]: 0.65, 1.37)和团体运动员(OR, 0.88;95% ci: 0.62, 1.25)。同样,耐力运动员(参照组)和技术运动员之间镇痛药的使用率也无差异(发生率比[IRR], 0.97;95% CI: 0.87, 1.07)或团体运动员(IRR, 1.03;95% ci: 0.94, 1.14)。不同组间使用的原因不同,但使用的镇痛药类型相似。影响镇痛药使用的社会文化因素包括考虑使用镇痛药治疗疼痛和损伤的潜在后果,以及对团队绩效负责的感觉。结论:丹麦青少年优秀运动员普遍使用镇痛药。在团队运动员、耐力运动员和技术运动员之间,镇痛药的使用通常没有变化。运动环境中的一些规范、价值观和结构影响了镇痛药的使用。[J] .体育学报,2015;55(5):1-11。2025年4月3日。doi: 10.2519 / jospt.2025.13015。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
It May Not Be the Smartest Thing to Do, but Sometimes It's the Only Option: A Longitudinal Mixed-Methods Study of Analgesic Use in Youth Elite Athletes.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) compare analgesic use over 36 weeks between endurance athletes, technical athletes, and team athletes, and (2) explore experiences and sociocultural factors impacting analgesic use. DESIGN: Longitudinal mixed-methods study METHODS: Six hundred eighty-nine youth elite athletes (44% girls/women, 15-20 years) provided weekly reports on number of days with analgesic use, reasons for use, and types of analgesics used for 36 weeks. Prevalence and frequency of analgesic use was compared between athletes from team sports, endurance sports, and technical sports using mixed-effects logistic and Poisson regression models. Reasons and types of analgesics used were compared between groups using Chi-square tests. Nine focus group interviews with 32 participants were conducted and analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: There were no differences in odds of analgesic use between endurance athletes (reference group), technical athletes (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65, 1.37), and team athletes (OR, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.62, 1.25). Similarly, there were no differences in rate of analgesic use between endurance athletes (reference group), technical athletes (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.97; 95% CI: 0.87, 1.07), or team athletes (IRR, 1.03; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.14). Reasons for use varied between groups, while the types of analgesics used were similar. Sociocultural factors impacting analgesic use included considering the potential consequences of using analgesics for pain and injury, and feeling responsible for team performance. CONCLUSION: Analgesics were commonly used among youth elite athletes in Denmark. Analgesic use generally did not vary between team athletes, endurance athletes, and technical athletes. Several norms, values, and structures in sports environments impacted analgesic use. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(5):1-11. Epub 3 April 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13015.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信